Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Rich Brown
2015-03-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/irK_m1vYGdUuFdbQ4UsjRAkNRgw/
1908845
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Curtis Villamizar
2015-03-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/6wXgL2alhwMPVyuyIAw_CLRs-Iw/
1908732
1074487
Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
Dave Taht
2015-03-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/npWcJT5hQ6HW_za8VbCi4M2XE9M/
1908317
1074486
Re: [aqm] [Bulk] Re: the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] [Bulk] Re: the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
David Collier-Brown
2015-03-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/WnCIQPDV6oRE2ELl83t701m6qpU/
1908280
1074486
[aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01.txt[aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01.txt
internet-drafts
2015-03-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/TsLnammKXnMqQ0qLvWGry5n2BWk/
1908226
1074484
[aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01.txt[aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01.txt
internet-drafts
2015-03-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/ydwniFZVVFjG2X9Hkng0s7cbFoo/
1908224
1074484
Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
Dave Taht
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/vYa1nWOViNstWjTT63Q12OAGBPk/
1907838
1074486
Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
Rong Pan (ropan)
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/FRNcpO4sxQyw76YW67G0-1aoZHM/
1907786
1074486
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/fjV5wH0H2U6AtVRESFIzhnmgTd4/
1907662
1074487
Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
KK
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/e62wipmMUcZ-gYA_vY0JzTBMxwY/
1907660
1074486
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
dpreed
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/my7hkggFQtgnLmZWCCDAoBPp70k/
1907549
1074487
[aqm] A new(ish) study on ECN in the Internet[aqm] A new(ish) study on ECN in the Internet
Brian Trammell
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/a5ylo-mgCM3SZgXwrl8DycTGLS8/
1907322
1074485
Re: [aqm] comments on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-00Re: [aqm] comments on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-00
Nicolas Kuhn
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/cFLzBtX2kO1LHjjxKhrAFcQics0/
1907271
1074513
Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
David Lang
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/yMLzJriQHGP6RnOmlJDZInNAi6A/
1907262
1074486
Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
KK
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/G6hwXE0faQvEhtSwJ6UjgJ2St5M/
1907249
1074486
Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filingRe: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
Vishal Misra
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/7EybH8BhHhwgWSAKSOhhDOV_br8/
1907231
1074486
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/GMLZ1oNS_uHIRqalZRtM_e1OGU4/
1907230
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/oknX7xH1hzMSXBhLnX6fyqBphro/
1907226
1074487
[aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing[aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
Dave Taht
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/3fd2ctiOWs9Jvg5nrNNHY74QV6s/
1907182
1074486
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Taht
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/wnUQ0Civer7ykZG8RiVv7djcXyI/
1907174
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/H0twXhY5Hwkp53N6jv7ao-RwiaM/
1906799
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Wesley Eddy
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/lOGbvcqSJljni0TtdotbvcgkIZ4/
1906766
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/wh9PRRWvuQ_2glJs88poDj4uW0Q/
1906748
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/VzY2IeGLWaKX_qCAU3chYG8Dyt0/
1906519
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Wes Felter
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/O5bdlprkSEUWBeoEOvMsVPKXbUk/
1906402
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/B4K65UsH36jzMylGaE51X_GBzMI/
1906300
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/v5e6s9lA8qy2srlxjSITtGuXCeE/
1906278
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Joe Touch
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/R2XPNsxO6xALIEOOQcuwcM0Gb54/
1906276
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/4sp2nwrVmsSLVMpoRzyb1KVgWgY/
1906272
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Joe Touch
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/EKGoMw8sF8yo2CiM61r4HqO9JlQ/
1906213
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/KxNCx8IdxH1sR4lC0h2p2VaxuL0/
1906159
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Taht
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/smPx4V7RExWRYFas304EnAmYyH4/
1906157
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Dolson
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/ZFGU6wQz9MbcIJUoAK_aTTsIyyU/
1906156
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Wes Felter
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/4HdaqClP7RfKNUaCjcGHdRPFIFw/
1906142
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/CTihm4Vo-FoRXr7HfbGcgOek01M/
1906141
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcomRe: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcom
Scheffenegger, Richard
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/K67QgEEma7J5GkXLJbBpxzl_cB4/
1905895
1074490
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Brian Trammell
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/eDB3r_V_Qw7EAwlx8qYXJhukc9c/
1905870
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcomRe: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcom
Livingood, Jason
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/VBQT-g_x6U6VTlRziA9m0sMX7Qg/
1905882
1074490
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
dpreed
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/6z6tdpLeeJltZZIcEUJKTf_pi6c/
1905797
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanogRe: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog
dpreed
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/rLEH0XsikDvZwvtFKhdNsC2WSOE/
1905789
1074489