Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/oknX7xH1hzMSXBhLnX6fyqBphro/
1907226
1074487
[aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing[aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
Dave Taht
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/3fd2ctiOWs9Jvg5nrNNHY74QV6s/
1907182
1074486
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Taht
2015-03-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/wnUQ0Civer7ykZG8RiVv7djcXyI/
1907174
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/H0twXhY5Hwkp53N6jv7ao-RwiaM/
1906799
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Wesley Eddy
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/lOGbvcqSJljni0TtdotbvcgkIZ4/
1906766
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/wh9PRRWvuQ_2glJs88poDj4uW0Q/
1906748
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/VzY2IeGLWaKX_qCAU3chYG8Dyt0/
1906519
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Wes Felter
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/O5bdlprkSEUWBeoEOvMsVPKXbUk/
1906402
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-03
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/B4K65UsH36jzMylGaE51X_GBzMI/
1906300
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/v5e6s9lA8qy2srlxjSITtGuXCeE/
1906278
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Joe Touch
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/R2XPNsxO6xALIEOOQcuwcM0Gb54/
1906276
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/4sp2nwrVmsSLVMpoRzyb1KVgWgY/
1906272
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Joe Touch
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/EKGoMw8sF8yo2CiM61r4HqO9JlQ/
1906213
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/KxNCx8IdxH1sR4lC0h2p2VaxuL0/
1906159
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Taht
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/smPx4V7RExWRYFas304EnAmYyH4/
1906157
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Dolson
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/ZFGU6wQz9MbcIJUoAK_aTTsIyyU/
1906156
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Wes Felter
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/4HdaqClP7RfKNUaCjcGHdRPFIFw/
1906142
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/CTihm4Vo-FoRXr7HfbGcgOek01M/
1906141
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcomRe: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcom
Scheffenegger, Richard
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/K67QgEEma7J5GkXLJbBpxzl_cB4/
1905895
1074490
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Brian Trammell
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/eDB3r_V_Qw7EAwlx8qYXJhukc9c/
1905870
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcomRe: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcom
Livingood, Jason
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/VBQT-g_x6U6VTlRziA9m0sMX7Qg/
1905882
1074490
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
dpreed
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/6z6tdpLeeJltZZIcEUJKTf_pi6c/
1905797
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanogRe: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog
dpreed
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/rLEH0XsikDvZwvtFKhdNsC2WSOE/
1905789
1074489
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Jonathan Morton
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/F2LN3_ahIFH0vRXtR7yrmSL9ick/
1905835
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/tDncqInU_s3le_9XrEqZD1sayuQ/
1905762
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Dolson
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/_YTHGE-uyhWT3YQo0GlVzzNzVJU/
1905761
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/o6HPENA_Xv63-lFXY5w4qRlYLkY/
1905752
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Brian Trammell
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/2vPBBXzwuHmobuOEnBrkVC2TFqk/
1905745
1074487
Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
David Lang
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/pxO4fWvLkBmVpmnWhoWyveSyDT4/
1905708
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/rZvuXQAxlIg8dgjD-F2jcKA7q2I/
1905666
1074487
Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/NwgFwrdO7pAeL2d395lQUEO07lg/
1905663
1074487
[aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"[aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
Dave Taht
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/ueOVRnLBxjdfksMBu0DgWLAOpsk/
1905662
1074487
Re: [aqm] Bufferbloat related censorship at Virgin MediaRe: [aqm] Bufferbloat related censorship at Virgin Media
David Collier-Brown
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/L_mqjcyvuYAtfJNhaSkqyGp0IRc/
1905629
1074488
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanogRe: [aqm] [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog
Jonathan Morton
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/R30IelsCKeVn7krOCkh0wpsyuHI/
1905707
1074489
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanogRe: [aqm] [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog
Jim Gettys
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/ThNHlFhsOCS35-TVcNiRLcqeIh4/
1905623
1074489
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanogRe: [aqm] [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog
Aaron Wood
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/xdklTNzdOoFp0Xv4r34mCkRSNus/
1905709
1074489
Re: [aqm] Bufferbloat related censorship at Virgin MediaRe: [aqm] Bufferbloat related censorship at Virgin Media
Dave Taht
2015-03-02
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/0nrzV5sLP9tIYKono3HGviU-bcc/
1905612
1074488
[aqm] Bufferbloat related censorship at Virgin Media[aqm] Bufferbloat related censorship at Virgin Media
Dave Taht
2015-03-01
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/7Mh6L-hOQhJoCZMVg5CArUGstiU/
1905601
1074488
[aqm] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog[aqm] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog
Dave Taht
2015-03-01
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/jDc1WEqR4tJL9COaWXFniQeewXg/
1905599
1074489
Re: [aqm] Is bufferbloat a real problem?Re: [aqm] Is bufferbloat a real problem?
Curtis Villamizar
2015-03-01
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/6g3gunmwE_yCZKK0BE1ILOAYaNI/
1905420
1074494
40 Messages