Subject
From
Date
List
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Peter Gutmann
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/OZxR5IRuW-AwkNe_NQTqXfqOBMo/
1905228
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Paul Hoffman
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/bW27QVG3qqpe8LFkOK27HMDgNmU/
1905273
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/pquP9HCPPr4FjIt7-b1wGpQeFJ8/
1905275
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Watson Ladd
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/u7xEzMF_wngijEdnsSwiiapWoqQ/
1905290
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/9rTg8UpqiCVozvEpTOcRiQYLQHk/
1905299
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Paul Hoffman
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/KormsWEdjaaYCVIgL3vMENSFcGc/
1905300
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Watson Ladd
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/vRCT42YvFFx8zBlTCdFQB3Ftlzk/
1905391
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Paul Hoffman
2015-03-01
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/HNRk70pn-EodveL1WeK-ju7WHq0/
1905404
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Johannes Merkle
2015-03-02
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/1SCYc5dnq6PcmYq85r4e8rRbxzQ/
1905890
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Watson Ladd
2015-03-02
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/RuxCmyUYUlzjPn6k5Agge_huANo/
1905939
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/n9kLpF4hPKGKN1hHplc9rR16YSE/
1905395
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Dan Harkins
2015-02-28
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/2yTrAXIYdbzEUmbvA3tpKxfywT8/
1905381
1101363
[Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"[Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Paul Lambert
2015-03-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/dtUZzdkrAFXf2Zth6WiWm3GkprM/
1912381
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Tony Arcieri
2015-03-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/XAb6IhCzBEtcorVWhVCEi9vAQ40/
1912411
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Watson Ladd
2015-03-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/WYldH7LPeGUytk1c-gb9Eu4thxY/
1912417
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Paul Lambert
2015-03-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/mxHUTqGLCMN0S75WlseXTTktZ9U/
1912425
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Watson Ladd
2015-03-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/YEoPwR7qsONN00aay5eZF7D1c4E/
1912437
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Paul Lambert
2015-03-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/9DdkKJ-jYyw9onsyd_Td0Md4RPU/
1912493
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/_1Nh2H1Fzoxliqd9G7MekaeK1yo/
1912516
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Paul Lambert
2015-03-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/lyOSmcLnZWnAVuyBqGHXxikwHJw/
1912419
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRGRe: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG
Paul Hoffman
2015-03-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/lU4wkdUqWnMYNTtCsgTY-vinKEg/
1912521
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Eggert, Lars
2015-03-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/oyRkgbRVnna4TRcf2Aqm46BIeoU/
1912616
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Stephen Farrell
2015-03-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/YZKdeDeYhl7vaqWhQ0nDC5A7INQ/
1912639
1101363
Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST"
Michael Hamburg
2015-03-13
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/uJeeCnBq2FrYGMO2Xo5XzouJkHY/
1914314
1101363
[Cfrg] Self-correction on mismatched security ... RE: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)[Cfrg] Self-correction on mismatched security ... RE: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Dan Brown
2015-02-26
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/57aShoessBqD7zuxX9tUUfp6ku4/
1904505
1101364
Re: [Cfrg] Self-correction on mismatched security ... RE: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Self-correction on mismatched security ... RE: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-26
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/_04Shbs_ZZOC9C60HrQZvDufPSk/
1904507
1101364
[Cfrg] Minimum required work force for additional curve[Cfrg] Minimum required work force for additional curve
Kurt Roeckx
2015-02-26
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/nlfud9YyzUwdf73X4tEKOBZyUSg/
1904377
1101365
Re: [Cfrg] Minimum required work force for additional curveRe: [Cfrg] Minimum required work force for additional curve
Michael Hamburg
2015-02-26
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/8qeql0m0al_jjvqHEXbq4vbI0c8/
1904411
1101365
Re: [Cfrg] Minimum required work force for additional curveRe: [Cfrg] Minimum required work force for additional curve
Simon Josefsson
2015-03-02
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/DtRHEuguBFOJqwxGruTUKiYer20/
1905775
1101365
[Cfrg] Client-side signature verification costs (was Re: Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd))[Cfrg] Client-side signature verification costs (was Re: Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd))
Brian Smith
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/qAavKSAr73LNIJ7XGEhdv4R_FZc/
1903749
1101366
[Cfrg] FYI: EdDSA and Ed25519[Cfrg] FYI: EdDSA and Ed25519
Simon Josefsson
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/9jWnSr33Zs9CtrXUmrZEBOo7Qew/
1903501
1101367
Re: [Cfrg] FYI: EdDSA and Ed25519Re: [Cfrg] FYI: EdDSA and Ed25519
Paterson, Kenny
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Q7p-Sw_aOWs3irf67SSFDcIZqAE/
1903504
1101367
[Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)[Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Paul Lambert
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/GtHOw27-5FTRgwV6FKx6utW4dbY/
1903482
1101368
Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Mike Hamburg
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/x7pTNIgJhAkaY5uMAhbhjTJDD4k/
1903570
1101368
Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/o1Sct38xV-pG-bZURG_UkpIEjr4/
1903679
1101368
Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Ilari Liusvaara
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/zj2dffk0Ro02jBYIMPJZxKia76Y/
1903707
1101368
Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Michael Hamburg
2015-02-25
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/BpOmZwcaKHoPqfy9_QReTHzneDg/
1903721
1101368
Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Derek Atkins
2015-02-26
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/yg0wVW9z-yFkLvt-HHGq8f8L57U/
1904202
1101368
Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-02-26
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/4S8k--RtIsQ15blp7FEeQV67dWI/
1904313
1101368
Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)Re: [Cfrg] Not the same thread -> was Re: Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
Watson Ladd
2015-02-27
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/3QMv-midVGoJUSPOrq7iYkt4Z2Y/
1904607
1101368
43 Messages