Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Alessandro Vesely
2020-10-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/30hKQ0KpdtCM3BeLI_qfbNNkoz4/
2940683
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Tim Wicinski
2020-10-09
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/eBgTWXRUJz_ZM6rQHOVsFgdTSP0/
2940508
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] RESENT fields?Re: [dmarc-ietf] RESENT fields?
Ken O'Driscoll
2020-10-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YL47sYtuhYUdVSiPPtj2p0Ad4GM/
2939318
1916647
[dmarc-ietf] RESENT fields?[dmarc-ietf] RESENT fields?
Douglas E. Foster
2020-10-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/oBFWiOgqj5_AtWJguqznx0hlNJg/
2939237
1916647
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC usage, was Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC usage, was Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
John Levine
2020-10-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MnozbkstukR-JzriABJaS2mE_vw/
2939150
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC usage, was Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC usage, was Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Jesse Thompson
2020-10-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7iGGwoBwFQd7TYMBYT2meWMjx_M/
2939123
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC usage, was Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC usage, was Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
John Levine
2020-10-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hgaLRuveUNqvbBSjGm770eqpx88/
2939049
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Vittorio Bertola
2020-10-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2yENSAqpduL8xXPO8-XIB8EdNrQ/
2938967
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Douglas E. Foster
2020-10-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YQ7_w7PWhd1ZuGaqeRBIzvdZK8w/
2938899
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Jesse Thompson
2020-10-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/HxSh4L3jm2NfI1EL8d4yoKID398/
2938882
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Oct 4 06:00:06 2020Re: [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Oct 4 06:00:06 2020
Alessandro Vesely
2020-10-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/C-sgOAcUH3M9h0KVboy3Mwm9bPc/
2938626
1916350
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Oct 4 06:00:06 2020[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Oct 4 06:00:06 2020
John Levine
2020-10-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/d6AKnw8_qxq0FPCn196BiLOrysM/
2938434
1916350
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/eHY7ZC5f6mkGzapZdI_qS9Ye48Q/
2937625
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Seth Blank
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ne5bEn179HsScSbm-0ZyfYB7cYM/
2937622
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/aRoCzIMW-t6JoOJwXUO0bpsP8pI/
2937615
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/AkbKOjIabuPHLVzr8f63YP1nC2s/
2937583
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draftRe: [dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft
Alessandro Vesely
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kuKAVu9p4z72KVWHoPEpWBQS5xo/
2937491
1915800
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Seth Blank
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8MUBcGD8BV29rky8SyyTSRo8nI0/
2937459
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Hector Santos
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IzNFdikZEdhUFlsdPTlN4_5I3Fs/
2937429
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Seth Blank
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/b6thcSkdp9VEy9q-qu63IvyVoX8/
2937424
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/HiRpWggrEQyj8yljuJVf4tzYCzE/
2937422
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Hector Santos
2020-10-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SeM-IVQ1ZhkP1hT08lNIKiSSQtk/
2937416
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EfbfstXq99XFhP280DbsVmxdn2I/
2937176
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/BXAVi_usR6L2d3Lw8tyDpv0V31U/
2937173
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wc3hc1bw7IlVYbnN50CUfnMyTJg/
2937172
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vlqWrBNNZ-gD8xYFUG7AX9Ix8AY/
2937163
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Kurt Andersen (b)
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/bZ5d1OiyYgenk-ZlqL1-JGf0vUU/
2937159
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicatorsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GK__FRraXS7x5dAZNx9ekqEF5_w/
2937129
1915764
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as overrideRe: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KzJ4VVtVUe4r9LnxOBX1CR-wjJ8/
2937116
1908582
[dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft[dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft
Douglas E. Foster
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3fJ62R-sr566AD_2VJIB7qdUSGE/
2937051
1915800
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as overrideRe: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LaJQ2ZxUOrHlMQgc1kSaPe7G8Uw/
2936964
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicatorsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/jbGuNIdZBaEgaWw5yE5tjlWYv18/
2936920
1915764
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as overrideRe: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/m0kYUum5u6fwkP6Ypo-M9Ltn5yI/
2936919
1908582
[dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators[dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GB_SNr55eNAjLgH5z2fo8i-e88c/
2936915
1915764
[dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override[dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Brandon Long
2020-09-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OTI93bcRXxrIetHkFzmzFcJj13Q/
2936902
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/R3QTedVkORQC4B0n0pgEuad7fRo/
2936870
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Seth Blank
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/RcBn_eKq5I5bvvjXyY1_SA6y0zA/
2936867
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/b4Y75kHtSYRc7kZ8uqRB18M_tkE/
2936866
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reportsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 51: disposition reporting in aggregate reports
Dave Crocker
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JZ3RfuPBet5u5ENAsi7WHBM-A0k/
2936865
1898442
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Hector Santos
2020-09-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZMtXd9Fv_mcWYJ9KHhkBqLOAA34/
2936861
1908582
40 Messages