Re: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/A1d-TnZCYbOG1Iuvcl0sUn48uqM/
2766366
1853065
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/6YgeMiY8HKXaQF04Apm-s9Z6dQk/
2766332
1852212
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kkjXLR_16NGaxd5aF9_Obt_HjaA/
2766317
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MkmJDjEbY5CLOmTUXEvcWPAx-kQ/
2766310
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OSxo48mfoxpXzcqC6A7GmXId-64/
2766309
1852619
[dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs[dmarc-ietf] Missing report elements and dmarc.org information based on deprecated drafs
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7QmWbMMEp-TpkjGmDg0wvzhtDuQ/
2766251
1853065
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Je8aG2PpkzFoGSnE80eO12EvdXI/
2765971
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistenciesRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistencies
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/bfc2UAJ7LfWRgdykTlm4E6_87Ew/
2765968
1852189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
John Levine
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3Ok2bQC6Dy_MmELD-unBZaQQZgg/
2765893
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistenciesRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistencies
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8kD52Ie8yWxxaaEsXPOG2as_caQ/
2765817
1852189
[dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?[dmarc-ietf] Should 'undeliverable mail' be included in DMARC rua reports?
Freddie Leeman
2019-08-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ql4WHQ_lbTZ3-ZziXEm_yBBgaKY/
2765711
1852917
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/PcG3AjeBbs20RuY5ugg-tkvteMQ/
2765003
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QUBbzhLI2-b0nOumycBZ54_Neoo/
2765000
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NzUuezzcP54-a_Qq0d0F0khuyqM/
2764999
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/T-69NZcpF1YAdw22YV75MLrlxQc/
2764995
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kCYWj6m7zEJGG54bh8JXFJArHag/
2764994
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Steve Atkins
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/M8EIMhJdDrq2wy-UdRbFMEVNGtY/
2764988
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/oe1VSCjyYEu44Ct_UVsQITVdNS4/
2764985
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Steve Atkins
2019-08-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ALsYBzgJFOF1bFT3EjlK7lpFdj4/
2764984
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do we need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do we need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Scott Kitterman
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/uK4or4Kphi7FYkQl7zExaJbeAVI/
2764903
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kiyBI3bqX7CQtOT5A1Aq_Dg8MZM/
2764902
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Jeremy Harris
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/T7dRjR65wnGRC529SapH8kBe8lg/
2764901
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nli31UHaq6CR3Grk0eAsbaRX7P8/
2764898
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Alessandro Vesely
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/h-6cuc9XlTGH0VpqZ7xd0ClR90Q/
2764897
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Scott Kitterman
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fbW-RkUVjByP8X4YPmCySkP4PqM/
2764857
1852619
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/STzUz1ShmMz8nBXyhkdjkmkmQVc/
2764845
1852619
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
John Levine
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/WDOudVDbrXpscYPjhpf6mTLEyrQ/
2764841
1852619
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GS_LnJrcEQ457ashjjBipLdBokU/
2764833
1852619
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiineRe: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
John Levine
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/rwN8AtY1HISoaqD66j2yoEvq6WI/
2764802
1852619
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd reviewRe: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
Scott Kitterman
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/FO58qOqe7gdRfhegW8ccbC-ZFx8/
2764796
1850799
[dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine[dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vAhbWixaw5XFLZ6ItoggGskgxNM/
2764784
1852619
[dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?[dmarc-ietf] Concerns for not Sending a Failure Report?
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/sWB5eWVJCoMxCP8-RSRbarIeLqY/
2764774
1852613
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SWnOZ0H0jgl2PGoIe-XV_VIJeVo/
2764765
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Rolf E. Sonneveld
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9U6xh5mPKrhmwkE1gwaxhZwXWHU/
2764753
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/rn613OQ0WsoMJIyoidlvwzw70ow/
2764746
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/k9INLeQOGuzr2d9fqrJPf9dqpnI/
2764723
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/UgpfDQ1zF0n0KB4WwvkpTH2tpGI/
2764702
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mCbI9oPe4icdkCGplfEd-4bpl3U/
2764700
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC ValidationRe: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
Дилян Палаузов
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5lCjBiH1CpH-6gU11Mg4cHrhi88/
2764634
1852520
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/VyF12igAuq9AHCO609VrCc3GHIU/
2764599
1843355