Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/epBXa4ZdOrcjFQWjKvwgV-HgcjY
2812488
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Seth Blank
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EN64puirNxCpcEU2uEQa1axdGfA
2812486
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hIJq5-EOwNh1V__7FXL-xWiFCv4
2812485
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9ZtpT1pmS_Ey0flpBm26zL26EQs
2812483
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YMcqyrYt6fXJr4jIlvjBOh0aXFM
2812480
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/26vkfPNS7H7WZJtj50PBL-z6H_o
2812479
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EkAN-gAfy5fvBxyRyayhyc9_M7A
2812478
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wQmlt1x9ksyiQfYNLK7MCevj05g
2812467
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Dave Crocker
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Afyaz0YiJ9tzsINpehFzPjBbBCc
2811984
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
John C Klensin
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GjjXiWXW_9up_88sVV9GuCLAceg
2811979
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/0zSX4eWn5xotC9ZrGVLKi3RRT6E
2811965
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
John C Klensin
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/33uQUlEcfbVv3vFNZNK7ffOAPS4
2811961
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Dave Crocker
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-KDgf1dxxxqcfP6iMAmOcpK8PkE
2811945
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mQZ-ZvkxGg6X2fyds8Z56Tbjvck
2811925
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Dave Crocker
2019-11-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1LRfgblj_lhbouY53tQEGftnUjk
2811534
1869328
[dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision[dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/shRbxWIRsicAVRusLKFgRf2TAss
2811520
1869328
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Дилян Палаузов
2019-11-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tEpuzwbRt__HHlVUXo41fHq5XoU
2806887
1840110
[dmarc-ietf] Purpose of aggregate reports / Re:Two new fields in aggregate reports[dmarc-ietf] Purpose of aggregate reports / Re:Two new fields in aggregate reports
Дилян Палаузов
2019-11-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/uPWe67-hN6oW4t98J6TXkLOqmYM
2806885
1863160
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Ian Levy
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SoJM8gNulOXGc0uZ_Aw1gZIiBBY
2804298
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/sQ80VwDRO2LPMODwFhaPr1XNt6k
2804226
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Ian Levy
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1gi1TNCtkn5c_n6utvJZJuVXqDk
2804201
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CUZNKqa6sWULxaF73lqlJCcSsL8
2804036
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-hxSR_ARN587TMo56CQ27EK9p8E
2804034
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wJmyLe-W0yuLyvLc_xr_QtdB4hw
2804028
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Dave Crocker
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/86idA5YAJcKKwhTU4vKRk9aAzw0
2804026
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Dave Crocker
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MJq9eO3Jh-VQIEt7I0bZ5eGF1GY
2804023
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-jF0f8GFZipgJFoPDKSG7ppiIz0
2804009
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_Q4pEZR18Vz5wTVT7t8JO6FuP1Y
2804004
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/B61OxDSzyYHorZvq6FDrAxlfin0
2803976
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Scott Kitterman
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dFBS2_BVkBLQrN_9OGmAArBSlM0
2803966
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/I7v9_hOCVWkS1Njj7Lej6p3XSWs
2803923
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CoIkpgi4aTv0TyJS4RlLcMy5URc
2803908
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Fd0LLYhdsDfbIoOkm4_Bj50eyLs
2803862
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_ZlytAeE2V6vt-cUMxl9MRpZwjk
2803860
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NPNVK2pGPa9w-wAyepzrHJp6v64
2803859
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZILbCCGS4TZPh0pCMrXhvAuIZT4
2803851
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/0mUyRwUMryf6UEdmBN68Df-Rk8o
2803761
1853845
[dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?[dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/H0ZERkvNR704eNolqSQ2ip9pWXo
2803751
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Jeremy Harris
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_Wx2o3GO3XywL7raHyC-g9aKIgE
2803750
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Scott Kitterman
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2fJmET72cLF1G8YXNLYGXOG4eH4
2803741
1853845
5672 Messages