Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fmed2ZLRRm-xWHVPqRFvF4hC4Mg/
2989262
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
John R Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/z7OpRvypsRXy305ZR2MELWCMaSQ/
2989250
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2U76Bm63aKioLBp4cd0KQXkBN0w/
2989248
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OxIjH2X67sG8J6oiOOVx7jEAYeg/
2989247
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/iSgpRqc8xqVmP0cebnUa494Qk2I/
2989246
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/e88KGdDc66quKJm-XnsE-BYTh18/
2989245
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/cl4OK6dGdtYseH4uL2cBcryCSIY/
2989242
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/yTLz-TGBMi-II56HgUoi3UOHrz4/
2989238
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Qh3-OMO6_Buubw09Eoqup9JfkW8/
2989229
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kwsIW3cxASQs-3Adv4c5jsk5YQs/
2989225
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/BZBfG3BrgSMDlLYetln0fKXYlNE/
2989221
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/bhPte_l9HQeg5tbdR7Vs0vgIDUw/
2989219
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
Kurt Andersen (b)
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/4StLLY72VvZDA7n2Wd2M0VnLG2E/
2989217
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/xfEE3gpLY4Lglrm9A90S17-YZwI/
2989211
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Todd Herr
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/L2_kOryRcAiePBJTKom2C7zbEqs/
2989208
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Brotman, Alex
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-Vi4W29ZDgROEIVrN8BeLN4DFmA/
2989207
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/71iYtEhZslfyPpmPOLZZKbGOrLI/
2989205
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/jVhyFtDUrfE_LMhKAQ3j4Vs4mjE/
2989204
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QCbFI-GRMkKGw0xXicrkAlIrKQc/
2989202
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Brotman, Alex
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/6jpMee-_gz0yKrsVd_2ATqtrAfU/
2989201
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/czgVZGvBw4UEzT0CzVIBuab7zh4/
2989194
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Wxqc-T4CgQ0qbIcMH4uy8Jum4nM/
2989191
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YPyzL49wbl4aeSuCwUobkNn1mYk/
2989188
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/yj2iYyDNAek9tn6JS3TaV8_iCVY/
2989180
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/VLZ7MdJQXA41xbqf-5nNaVwNVVY/
2989174
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7AzcMm4GnQs1OFigeIGNV9M4gsY/
2989173
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dpgc7eBR5g1RV7CFPPz-KnQk5vk/
2989169
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kb1pil97QlQXHA1m4IO2Ry27T0Q/
2989165
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fAmw7gy6AnXkts-f7N9H5I2wbOM/
2989162
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/s5Sb19YqvFplNDDlZ6UThZak5og/
2989160
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/b8_r_IKkOfX72o41sf6j7aV_iBU/
2989155
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/it3v99syJQXN2C74Q6p3Rp3w2sE/
2989154
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/rJRK0AdEMI2CV0-1hoziUIEMEmM/
2989147
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Vn-MKb1QRtkwu2rfijULJOssLbU/
2989140
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Todd Herr
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZAgtD4MgiJvNhrOxftuGcsVezNI/
2989135
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/H13Gxh7PTIt_YqR1WGOeBOsWkjs/
2989101
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Todd Herr
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Se1FV2yA5CA-H9-7Z0t3vu16NIk/
2989060
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/X8AdQzplRGy1H5uJtSG9GrhYUwg/
2989049
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/qkif2M5vguYVBCrDosu_Wr0R3OY/
2989042
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hjFiAJXY9rQW6Gn7dGPoe9cZlzs/
2989029
1935189
8436 Messages