Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Dotzero
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/iICS6gtnO9BJ_q2dzvFOd-wm1pQ/
2972206
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Dave Crocker
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_XKc6jDPuCSLZqN43Dpk2M8hVgc/
2972205
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5UlGAy3hvN2LvsZ7LXv1HLsg-ak/
2972203
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Alessandro Vesely
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/lzjPj0N0-SMci1Zdq64mdXNaHpg/
2972202
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Alessandro Vesely
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DgF2oksHHbmQp3OpANgcOYS7UYU/
2972201
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Alessandro Vesely
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MOWWsgYF-v0hajFc-vlPGmPU_Zc/
2972199
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Michael Thomas
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/zkDOIO3LuNX7fkAG_MGonG5bfnM/
2972190
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Alessandro Vesely
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8pm9xrKCg_-sjyD7MmwxUbwRgdU/
2972189
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion: Removal of validation for external destinations (Ticket #76)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion: Removal of validation for external destinations (Ticket #76)
Alessandro Vesely
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/FJKR29C_ptU8yUlc9pbHUrUhkeQ/
2972186
1928596
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Alessandro Vesely
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SgBUrWaFVveLZ7-uRLQnZxKkVMM/
2972185
1928001
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Dec 6 06:00:05 2020[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Dec 6 06:00:05 2020
John Levine
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/uq3BCGIK02hlDUVJWp4ZZpWZoLI/
2972183
1928649
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/uLv_g8-7QuTooKmO31b2t3wf9JI/
2972160
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
John R Levine
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/S5vdecZWgu_369k9f4Mhse80y8M/
2972159
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Jim Fenton
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/sknJ55aV-2ucvSme8rvPI-6s8_o/
2972158
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Hector Santos
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1obBgos-7USpZZLLTLeJfD94uAE/
2972157
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Jim Fenton
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/BOtmUyJDycxBFUGtzYy3ZwhsuvU/
2972156
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/65Y_KkS1o42BHwI3nFUmHzolIeg/
2972155
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/p0fCRyQpGZN97HLLlB3RDg0QHIA/
2972154
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
John R Levine
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1yvwigue1xL_z8efiakehJ33tf4/
2972153
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Jim Fenton
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/S67q3i5YFNd1J5KibseUwnXjqCA/
2972151
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TKgdPjGcs4EgsJvFx1Or3m22pKU/
2972150
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
John Levine
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DuSGyDUnKR_GaWuzxaRBXfoYD9g/
2972149
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/4iy_DZu-S9rYO9b-WK5-Bb2u-zE/
2972144
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Douglas Foster
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/s5D4zJzzBSWpdvSF09NPYtDNZe0/
2972143
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2b6j7FAg_PiM9HekARMUDEjf6PY/
2972141
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Dave Crocker
2020-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7EEYA_QAM98YDMXM942VRwWjneE/
2972136
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/RGHKaVO2x1nTsz-p6LrcJHgEqEs/
2972134
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Tim Wicinski
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/69tAMDF1RXEtEyeC80omLKxrH8E/
2972133
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/16D_3EUhyanmFID-sn0m9DJ88ZE/
2972131
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Dave Crocker
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/xny4NIsfOqh3VrDriUtALF05G6k/
2972129
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/iFrCePut0W4cxq0sHdL1crlgHDs/
2972127
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
John Levine
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/F3rkUB8FXkChr9e9wUpSdb6Mslo/
2972126
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/p0yC0SWIjC4tSywYKmwg-M4ShME/
2972113
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
John Levine
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/u6hbqb9slkqjYrdpm5XFVkE2MSE/
2972112
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/qzr6ehhkM2vv_pUYzH5z1PwIFOY/
2972107
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John Levine
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Cg8143cmPcq1GBJ8PgSwu9_-IIY/
2972104
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questionsRe: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions
Michael Thomas
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YDe3vfdxLnkfBYuKv9bqC2kFA7Q/
2972103
1927370
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
John Levine
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NcM3_NzaZxKAIE6I0sQTsDvV6Xs/
2972102
1928606
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questionsRe: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions
John Levine
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/FwTzFUOoly4YtsccMExWFqxKrNg/
2972101
1927370
[dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject[dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
Michael Thomas
2020-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ue6rXtShAxl9B-wFGhe7f1U2Ciw/
2972097
1928606
40 Messages