Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mQZ-ZvkxGg6X2fyds8Z56Tbjvck/
2811925
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Dave Crocker
2019-11-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1LRfgblj_lhbouY53tQEGftnUjk/
2811534
1869328
[dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision[dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/shRbxWIRsicAVRusLKFgRf2TAss/
2811520
1869328
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Дилян Палаузов
2019-11-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tEpuzwbRt__HHlVUXo41fHq5XoU/
2806887
1840110
[dmarc-ietf] Purpose of aggregate reports / Re:Two new fields in aggregate reports[dmarc-ietf] Purpose of aggregate reports / Re:Two new fields in aggregate reports
Дилян Палаузов
2019-11-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/uPWe67-hN6oW4t98J6TXkLOqmYM/
2806885
1863160
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Ian Levy
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SoJM8gNulOXGc0uZ_Aw1gZIiBBY/
2804298
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/sQ80VwDRO2LPMODwFhaPr1XNt6k/
2804226
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Ian Levy
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1gi1TNCtkn5c_n6utvJZJuVXqDk/
2804201
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CUZNKqa6sWULxaF73lqlJCcSsL8/
2804036
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-hxSR_ARN587TMo56CQ27EK9p8E/
2804034
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wJmyLe-W0yuLyvLc_xr_QtdB4hw/
2804028
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Dave Crocker
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/86idA5YAJcKKwhTU4vKRk9aAzw0/
2804026
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Dave Crocker
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MJq9eO3Jh-VQIEt7I0bZ5eGF1GY/
2804023
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-jF0f8GFZipgJFoPDKSG7ppiIz0/
2804009
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_Q4pEZR18Vz5wTVT7t8JO6FuP1Y/
2804004
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/B61OxDSzyYHorZvq6FDrAxlfin0/
2803976
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Scott Kitterman
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dFBS2_BVkBLQrN_9OGmAArBSlM0/
2803966
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/I7v9_hOCVWkS1Njj7Lej6p3XSWs/
2803923
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CoIkpgi4aTv0TyJS4RlLcMy5URc/
2803908
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Fd0LLYhdsDfbIoOkm4_Bj50eyLs/
2803862
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_ZlytAeE2V6vt-cUMxl9MRpZwjk/
2803860
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NPNVK2pGPa9w-wAyepzrHJp6v64/
2803859
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZILbCCGS4TZPh0pCMrXhvAuIZT4/
2803851
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/0mUyRwUMryf6UEdmBN68Df-Rk8o/
2803761
1853845
[dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?[dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/H0ZERkvNR704eNolqSQ2ip9pWXo/
2803751
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Jeremy Harris
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_Wx2o3GO3XywL7raHyC-g9aKIgE/
2803750
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Scott Kitterman
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2fJmET72cLF1G8YXNLYGXOG4eH4/
2803741
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dKJ2WdnjjgxPUmYjIMmbAuekrQQ/
2803739
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YCf_twL0ezY5a46LEmtCnCV6Ce8/
2803736
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/PK8dhCu6cHuoCP_y2owS10P6UsY/
2803734
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/eLG56JCHj7az-2rd6frCzdZguu0/
2803727
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Dave Crocker
2019-11-08
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/WJ-D85peWGtoChGMgcGyGSET6tE/
2803066
1866198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Brandon Long
2019-11-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/xmx2yJFCRuUExfQgQdpjC5CGHVI/
2803049
1866198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Brandon Long
2019-11-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QYrjx-XaDXeD0Ik8BU2d5tG7eos/
2803041
1866198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Dave Crocker
2019-11-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/C2-H8V_8f2tfGS75I_arF1yGLrQ/
2802886
1866198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wPtf0cQRg6rTxI98JlcbWaMXX34/
2802881
1866198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Weist, Bill
2019-11-07
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/lt9UJyvyHMcxPuG33deXssTe6gs/
2802930
1866198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Brandon Long
2019-11-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JsjQRq4yQzf28gSXnfWK6Cqksks/
2802392
1866198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/lJNADepgNYW3Ci587L0JQ0vbRkM/
2802311
1866198
[dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617[dmarc-ietf] Question regarding RFC 8617
Weist, Bill
2019-11-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/w5PIid3HMCKP6xfzCrjWr-JdK4Q/
2802306
1866198
6238 Messages