Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/qkif2M5vguYVBCrDosu_Wr0R3OY/
2989042
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hjFiAJXY9rQW6Gn7dGPoe9cZlzs/
2989029
1935189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Дилян Палаузов
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5wikO78tFQio9yoa8ViLntj8BMQ/
2988975
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/h8VClwjxikLE0Y3qhVC4Qxuke3Y/
2988963
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hvxmn_PYMbsDvSQOpZsb9n9JDrs/
2988960
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/WKSlVs9jSbUljaouxx2W4nMVPDQ/
2988958
1935546
[dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help[dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
John R. Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vW3NSwAqfg218Nho3JGqxOdW58A/
2988957
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Brotman, Alex
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8aduXESBhWEk1oAAE10ji-b7e1I/
2988942
1935189
[dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)[dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Brotman, Alex
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/oN8jMt0kuLZVSu7yy2BCaFHoQuA/
2988940
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Michael Thomas
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/oXJkKsDj7lLCTTVvG8P4NENawss/
2988918
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John Levine
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/qOLByxB0YjTWYfsLER08zAUXjeg/
2988915
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Michael Thomas
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/zKPa24R2pE4w9T3nVgEP7MRh5iA/
2988899
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John Levine
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DPniKp2QBtTKmDnzEpamiWT7Srg/
2988898
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Michael Thomas
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wWiUnSweo5RXd8TMfr3cgvvTYAY/
2988897
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
John Levine
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mFk0qiTCy8tzghRvcxus01W_Blw/
2988896
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John Levine
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/cqU3RQOVCNeK1EAIc2vUon0A3Os/
2988895
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/i0SqrZepOLmDh4FJ9wHE2o530KU/
2988894
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
John Levine
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/q2tfUzyirswrAPQS-MktWsilSZo/
2988887
1935511
[dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing[dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/pZOvBQMkSmertwebUseq1eIdJxI/
2988852
1935511
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jan 24 06:00:05 2021[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jan 24 06:00:05 2021
John Levine
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LafozPYI-rFyICDdYlHvZp_ZkP4/
2988848
1935508
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-24
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/eetPRaK6WX7Xe30ThvirXMBLluw/
2988803
1888629
[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt
internet-drafts
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/L4h1u9he5l3medu24q8EXEATS-c/
2988796
1935484
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Kru-hg0e1-1ffJkYVxV3sl7c53M/
2988748
1935189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/aFhoZs29C4jlGn8XBW3paAFLkao/
2988738
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/P7ON8LTfnDEVTNo9D3GXeWxioDs/
2988737
1935189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/V5Pe8HjZfOK0DkpB4yna60LIGik/
2988711
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Tim Wicinski
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZuMXQx51BBJsYOfPiein3YHSVJU/
2988708
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_ZpIkVke3SIO3FUzIPS6QEfhdw8/
2988688
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Tim Wicinski
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-gkTsxvXajoTnTtf_sMtjejNqcw/
2988683
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Kurt Andersen (b)
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9uAd-uUgdbE7u70VX2D5qqLZP94/
2988682
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5MwvzsFTrTybyXx_LP-7L4-6RW4/
2988681
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Kurt Andersen (b)
2021-01-23
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Te87X4zE8GnoT9e9qYrVWM08YsE/
2988680
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Tim Wicinski
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3NI0hCP5SKB0qmFmDBuO3zUmClc/
2988647
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/71Cj0x5WFh7GMYEBSbL9hMoZ5ZM/
2988646
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Tim Wicinski
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Af3ZDDndKmUns1qLk-N3S6MTOlE/
2988641
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
John Levine
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DIVSZhJzHc3lXrJt-OXPYafQEK8/
2988627
1935189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Tim Wicinski
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wKkjDRVo2PYy9e6uL3LumtciTEo/
2988626
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
Tim Wicinski
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kuQINDJiySP5vjRPIL45gjn_8KQ/
2988549
1888629
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MZ4N_JcM-3m_CP-WvNNcrfDe2Ak/
2988430
1935189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Seth Blank
2021-01-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Yq9jnn4mZZA9W6gajiNQRkcCT08/
2988428
1935189
8572 Messages