[dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30[dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
2024-03-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/p9Ll1zkx-wn2LEZ5zoQDoVyDQoE/
3443794
2127040
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Not Multiple From: mailboxes, was I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-24.txtRe: [dmarc-ietf] Not Multiple From: mailboxes, was I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-24.txt
Dotzero
2022-11-25
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/3Qy9KWbTsSvWJXTOh57o3qlUYag/
3251513
2039202
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing ListsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists
Scott Kitterman
2021-10-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/hnLsEAxXiT7HU8_OYc0EmLxTOEI/
3081493
1973834
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing ListsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC-Compliant Mailing Lists
Dave Crocker
2021-10-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/90pXIcUAoseZDv7BE5SpWsJMxq0/
3081486
1973834
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Question on ABNFRe: [dmarc-ietf] Question on ABNF
Tim Wicinski
2021-05-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/6mb6-UUCSCtCgmCN0UWoFBnGj3c/
3039021
1956407
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From AddressesRe: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses
Charles Gregory
2021-03-24
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/f09iGimMsdDHiHZbsKfidt4XwyE/
3013786
1945532
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From AddressesRe: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses
Hector Santos
2021-03-24
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/K90368eCkiwAvzNkNfmvsb_uWtc/
3013785
1945532
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From AddressesRe: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses
Dave Crocker
2021-03-24
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Sl_oLpRJInQ36Xp-UwFHNm4Rcvo/
3013769
1945532
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #80 - DMARCbis Should Have Clear and Concise Definition of DMARCRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #80 - DMARCbis Should Have Clear and Concise Definition of DMARC
Todd Herr
2021-01-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/vIBmQbrSp9TB9YctPEvuJr5nk4I/
2987075
1931377
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #80 - DMARCbis Should Have Clear and Concise Definition of DMARCRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #80 - DMARCbis Should Have Clear and Concise Definition of DMARC
Todd Herr
2021-01-05
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ua9s09-I9sIHH-ZGgwRFLnogvrc/
2980471
1931377
[dmarc-ietf] Ticket #80 - DMARCbis Should Have Clear and Concise Definition of DMARC[dmarc-ietf] Ticket #80 - DMARCbis Should Have Clear and Concise Definition of DMARC
Todd Herr
2020-12-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/xhUuxDT3KYJfT1CPHuO-L131Vyc/
2979472
1931377
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed Introduction and Abstract (was I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed Introduction and Abstract (was I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt)
Dave Crocker
2020-12-12
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fcYTbe13wTgTfLgmtP4MXFKctTk/
2975112
1925249
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Michael Thomas
2020-12-04
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/nKjlhw_3Pnn28jHBt2WeaXBxTpg/
2971931
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
Seth Blank
2020-12-04
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/oHII64DJ1ivhkama-gTirLHXIeQ/
2971923
1928541
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Organizational domains, threat or menage, was On splitting documents and DBOUNDRe: [dmarc-ietf] Organizational domains, threat or menage, was On splitting documents and DBOUND
Seth Blank
2020-11-11
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/inSqylbeS8HexnX7bKBnG-Qc_9E/
2962285
1925120
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicatorsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Trying to understand DMARC in light of Sender/indicators
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/GK__FRraXS7x5dAZNx9ekqEF5_w/
2937129
1915764
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as overrideRe: [dmarc-ietf] Objections to Sender header as override
Dave Crocker
2020-09-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/KzJ4VVtVUe4r9LnxOBX1CR-wjJ8/
2937116
1908582
[dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft[dmarc-ietf] Weakend Signatures vs Experimental draft
Douglas E. Foster
2020-09-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/3fJ62R-sr566AD_2VJIB7qdUSGE/
2937051
1915800
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Scott Kitterman
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/b-VaBHQvvJ9GpQV_057KB5YzkL0/
2935935
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/VnooQpHJuFe8tGj628MMUcOmHEI/
2935928
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Seth Blank
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/b7qZ-aEIbMTBf_iu3w04n-xKdjY/
2935927
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Douglas E. Foster
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/_kK95vORxAn5PcM5TUwPtnDcCN4/
2935922
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Tim Wicinski
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/BLeN9lQZtwi4A6IkKobIObnNQhE/
2935911
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Scott Kitterman
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/qO3OUv6TghONjWH4Ivoi7Xb9wio/
2935907
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Douglas E. Foster
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/CP95OsPM9rajkuGTf_rK77GvJm0/
2935892
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Dave Crocker
2020-09-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/_4C7uFHBb6ZnqDlrJjuij3qZ1T4/
2935854
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
Scott Kitterman
2020-09-25
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/dSRdMWt2OdJe3molm1p06ZagIR8/
2935822
1908582
[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-sender-00.txt[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-sender-00.txt
internet-drafts
2020-09-25
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/gSHAGQVaj2F95fTcpDPLddwM6Wo/
2935601
1915332
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header FieldRe: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field
David I
2020-08-20
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/5-2sS2YuYruiMCOmrCuxVdyr-QA/
2921969
1908582
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Alessandro Vesely
2020-08-20
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/M7OhJrErG8gnaiqZJm4cYJK5MCg/
2921786
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Douglas E. Foster
2020-08-20
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/NqkBlm7iGJCHP49L8xNioOPZiJs/
2921643
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Joseph Brennan
2020-08-20
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/oi4L6fCJabxs4sRt7yYKCvSkpC8/
2921558
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Kurt Andersen (b)
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/TskRV5y-z9OFWAeA95y62xl_s7M/
2921487
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
John R Levine
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/vJ_0GXB0Guhj1Ijur4NhPnOCaYw/
2921383
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/NeWNm7-mrmHIoegaxDZi6bQeGeQ/
2921370
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Dotzero
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/2-L0D50svFzE9R8UKJIDFdE1j3A/
2921333
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
John R Levine
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/o9WylUZzsCY55Foh53Vnf2IJ_ug/
2921323
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Dotzero
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/9OYGsp7ICrF7N7fIbGM7MsgAFl8/
2921321
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
John R Levine
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Gs2D-OJ1jRqU43OsMP-zXODN17M/
2921270
1909802
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01Re: [dmarc-ietf] Revisiting the Race Condition in draft-crocker-dmarc-sender-01
Dotzero
2020-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/PTVmKKMYRoxueDIZke-59IUbVjM/
2921141
1909802