Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/T12XVO3FQ9gOwYZdkjW_-XcHfIE/
2989530
1928001
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Reports helping spammers? (#81)[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Reports helping spammers? (#81)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-26
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Z6B52tVuOiEBJ2dK35_Ze361tB0/
2989446
1935189
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/61hgaF9KO676PZuDjFz7i5fPf3I/
2989359
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1m4BMqFKk-exDeH9rdhOCgKSDcY/
2989356
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
Scott Kitterman
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/gMcXDbQr1dxEKnrfNOwApI-X0pg/
2989346
1928000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Steven M Jones
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/RsoKpJZFDjiIfu8xe0FJgBh96_E/
2989344
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Todd Herr
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/noUQtbwuDdKGwRrk-N32mMASd0Y/
2989343
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/keug59CMIiQzQQPCEjtvYxmjW0o/
2989341
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] reporting security requirementsRe: [dmarc-ietf] reporting security requirements
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/bNHImrPlmyN_t-f2RgKqRrs3DhM/
2989332
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
Todd Herr
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KEgXmhBimyn4sb_WYbDJtiR8hwY/
2989331
1928000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2
John R Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/0s9yKSkEG1YQ0kYgVbDn_gQOr4A/
2989305
1935674
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
John R Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mOcYW39Z_RXh3xmUTAtctBOGQaw/
2989304
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] reporting security requirementsRe: [dmarc-ietf] reporting security requirements
Seth Blank
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/0dIL68EWtHstv76HaUvQelkc2gk/
2989303
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/qI_JWzcVtTKONahG7dpvIqsJQxo/
2989301
1935674
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/U1OjMDB5fB24OO7k65MzQoJIO2o/
2989300
1928001
[dmarc-ietf] reporting security requirements[dmarc-ietf] reporting security requirements
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Xz2FeBfU8ALzoOVGe01D0yuwbK0/
2989299
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GaoToSC0gcbKtjYn2piKk4GOVag/
2989298
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2
Murray S. Kucherawy
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3lWtRBFDyheL1fGPxO_n8dwt70g/
2989297
1935674
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nQq_zBukE93oyYTkLgEBF5DTpdg/
2989287
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Rlx0K-6vDOoFKk39ssnwlOA4AA8/
2989285
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/WWOoBm6nK3g_Gidg-lEOUq3jylg/
2989280
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1k9063PsZgsSg9KHkVH34ARmhy4/
2989278
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Todd Herr
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/idDtxf_80VdRV9wUhsLb6oMdM8I/
2989277
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/iXyhYxgcVj7Imux1JW5fI0pnJfo/
2989276
1928001
[dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2[dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2
John R Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nBX1tmc95gdDyOJHVB1xSGu9-pM/
2989275
1935674
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/L5cdWIbZLow-47Yw8Fc8bcFxsdw/
2989271
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/r4jKrFkxIds-XkAK4nFhH4xhvzw/
2989269
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)
Brotman, Alex
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QjPXfjKX1eO7MEcpxzjnaUHXDAw/
2989268
1928198
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/WNAhvY94kg7VQueMzgUsM-ZwvnI/
2989267
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionalityRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DtkAAcZe1GDmPsUTFnOw3culSVA/
2989266
1928001
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fmed2ZLRRm-xWHVPqRFvF4hC4Mg/
2989262
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
John R Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/z7OpRvypsRXy305ZR2MELWCMaSQ/
2989250
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closingRe: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55, closing
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2U76Bm63aKioLBp4cd0KQXkBN0w/
2989248
1935511
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OxIjH2X67sG8J6oiOOVx7jEAYeg/
2989247
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/iSgpRqc8xqVmP0cebnUa494Qk2I/
2989246
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Douglas Foster
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/e88KGdDc66quKJm-XnsE-BYTh18/
2989245
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
John Levine
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/cl4OK6dGdtYseH4uL2cBcryCSIY/
2989242
1935546
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/yTLz-TGBMi-II56HgUoi3UOHrz4/
2989238
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Which DKIM(s) should be reported? (Ticket #38)
Alessandro Vesely
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Qh3-OMO6_Buubw09Eoqup9JfkW8/
2989229
1935537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not helpRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tickets 98 and 99 -- fake reports are not a problem and if they were authentication would not help
Michael Thomas
2021-01-25
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kwsIW3cxASQs-3Adv4c5jsk5YQs/
2989225
1935546
382 Messages