Subject
From
Date
List
[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
Richard Clayton
2011-10-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/o1pBmJYSgkAX37eY7Kcn6cGFp7A/
370542
1127635
Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
Måns Nilsson
2011-10-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/4GSoochyjLkJGfnkQ3aBC9TNqg0/
370543
1127635
Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
John Levine
2011-10-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Z__-KCggdsbMnuHQiL2mMHwjUqM/
370544
1127635
[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
Richard Clayton
2012-01-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/BFcM_pMvLIaXLDcVBUelMsRjBx0/
370831
1127635
[dnsext] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-01.txt[dnsext] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-01.txt
Edward Lewis
2011-10-14
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/MLfQ4j6Jadz3kgLUBpC0SRuMNL0/
370537
1127636
[dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reports[dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reports
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ByHY__mRF_G3hjohF8JctKDysN4/
370532
1127637
Re: [dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reportsRe: [dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reports
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/7dSLPcLujfx8G4so8-dk3eAVxQI/
370533
1127637
[dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit[dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-06
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/6lPvcBme3Bi7HVEAXMgxGliOuFE/
370509
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/j_y9pRph7z9h4M01hm1fSj_VwxU/
370510
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/FAj1khA8LQWCKmTxUD67huY2VMU/
370511
1127638
[dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit[dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/pbEerLU-FMo2aglT7TA94fwtgGc/
370513
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/1Lb8nkvtrnKUcBNb4bPjm75XlcA/
370514
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/1zMTyyLKZruatJH2-wKG1WOlhrk/
370515
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
David Conrad
2011-10-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/cgsiX1lCegzFFWklon77DfGKtbc/
370517
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/xxNaoCc4Yy1NAHFcX3Zc6-c3ASg/
370518
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/4rAs6DfVkRqYjOvBokcN-hEpd0Q/
370520
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/aYtT_0m16awPObImY_AgBfck8Wk/
370521
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/hHC8sbsQOVOW6w4YampJzosNAIc/
370522
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/sPB007DqI5vJ90FctatBMSWWIZw/
370523
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/_IomIBZNqDHcF2aLJKpKljrlyjY/
370524
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/nATZbXIa1MW0auwUHTwPGFhYOEk/
370525
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/k6rGj2vYHzEmz0MZqdo4l82DZCo/
370527
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/5UEFWB70nsnTbGWX9OcMr73YUfw/
370529
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/7kzM5C3gQdStWndbyt1xCmluZfo/
370530
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/i8Vc1a_Gn_RHfCdE8sIh846u9Yg/
370531
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2011-10-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/FUeQhyT0p7bB987EnpHmaHXHF_M/
370538
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/VulSkkONROvpbmQ_DuzskFzni7g/
370539
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/EHMESvO3Gh_cS1FpFv55QgHX7vI/
370540
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/von6X1Fia--XEz6Nu35Wbuw1m-U/
370546
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/BzqYn_CpqOqAzssjUTKARgAFRRc/
370547
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/dJRhv_KAFedQSWFvVjoz520I8U0/
370548
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/IlHLHw47Dv-UAmh1avySbUgjUKM/
370549
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/05OZ9ePSGkg-nLLC3EBXzMbpv6I/
370550
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/CIItV27i_BSna94sfv_Vezc-FoE/
370551
1127638
[dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)[dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/OiycAWeYIUw0GcAFJmDwHBshoNI/
370553
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Brian Dickson
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Lg-T0Af6nDm0ob39AVj1AFDEu8s/
370554
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Edward Lewis
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/J7C13Jan3CPo1htvzabXjbfgMls/
370560
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Michael StJohns
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Gz1Js_KECrOocEJEEZ2eflPaO2U/
370563
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Nicholas Weaver
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/pY0rzX0e4uvDRYZpnEm2bJr8R6M/
370564
1127638
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Michael StJohns
2011-10-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/1S8HqwbRDrUEg58OjZn_q7MKpmQ/
370565
1127638