Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvaluesRe: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/lUf636uEs00i80BRcKY8H9dBfyU/
480455
1164491
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/NySHReB2ZZIe8M38huauXq9xFUc/
480454
1164484
Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvaluesRe: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
Amos Jeffries
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/qITG5eCIs8it3CYmYFcdW4fAcpA/
480453
1164491
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
William Chan (陈智昌)
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/sLWSx3uX34N7YUmBAfAy6I-uzWo/
480452
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/GIUjG2uwQBEhhZY8b7uIBTYpxrg/
480451
1164484
Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
Willy Tarreau
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/GOMqcL7Ms7Q4xfC336gxdITTMm8/
480450
1164499
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
William Chan (陈智昌)
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/U_L6U_WVg79jzMZ8jZ5BXi88f1c/
480449
1164484
Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/n2Als6a7J5dvPRO9tcvnDNo15g8/
480448
1164499
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
William Chan (陈智昌)
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/fyLFcfxU3qdRlQxbmjT4AQ42cAQ/
480447
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Adrien W. de Croy
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/XiibxSqTHL4oqnRdupyVTu45pII/
480446
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/42dSuHfmEH6ChfNhP91aa5oTi_8/
480445
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Nico Williams
2013-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Q88a-JqSTLksmnatG_Vra2o8640/
480444
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
William Chan (陈智昌)
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/9RSM40hGUnoezeUYS2njhzWd6nM/
480443
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
William Chan (陈智昌)
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/gdHBLI8XfDoLSwT1FZ3wKKl4Qk4/
480442
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/tOykbP0qJbieaHSII1gzb4Pudpc/
480441
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Roberto Peon
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/bA_Uiv9WFoOeOykSCsd6_fEE06Y/
480440
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/jYYKG-ydMEV-8F7tmCoQeJ5ZPYk/
480439
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Amos Jeffries
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/FfGxf7KC_7eHzxKtkS72Cl2wM4Y/
480438
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Adrien W. de Croy
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/C6Whgw3XG8Jf4t0mEoipXqI9lEQ/
480437
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
James M Snell
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/9sGTy6YThwFfkLkztnltglh68Ng/
480436
1164484
Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvaluesRe: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
Adrien W. de Croy
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/4psKGcdO8MuGX9LQVuPsA7tgudc/
480435
1164491
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Tim Bray
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/1FT1K7kaDnpSctRDKa44-zUFggU/
480434
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
William Chan (陈智昌)
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Z3W-LIcZ3gQeZsRL-3c8JQYSfJs/
480433
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
David Morris
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Cy4qxxIfecyXPbP96LMnk1qGtwE/
480432
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Amos Jeffries
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Hpf6fUfxtNkc97pAmFvP9jRV-oE/
480431
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Nq1FgV8VAuUExI1JO2Rh8nGyTjo/
480430
1164484
Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvaluesRe: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/FhCtA819AqWMitOH-zpmwvJ28NU/
480429
1164491
Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvaluesRe: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
James M Snell
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/8eeD6YJjBgptV8o71Mp051viHVk/
480428
1164491
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
William Chan (陈智昌)
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/TUHYkuFsOLqCIEpX5xMUOYU4cEc/
480427
1164484
Re: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodRe: The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Willy Tarreau
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/L9tRaj2wX8tKxxI3bn91WgYKxpc/
480426
1164484
The use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not goodThe use of binary data in any part of HTTP 2.0 is not good
Pablo
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/QPZxeg4eGP0ydvXwkx4mkFgi2KU/
480425
1164484
Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvaluesRe: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/aIXwbJg3PB5IrBXXHgLGofu4D3Q/
480424
1164491
Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvaluesRe: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
Roy T. Fielding
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/tAVSMZe8N1ylc5qipaPqwh7g_nI/
480423
1164491
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
Willy Tarreau
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/9bZ-Dgrt3o9Hvxa9v74aB9iWhdc/
480422
1164506
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/WkUuNWMFIbgp0uE7plFdOG9EQxk/
480421
1164506
Re: Lingering CloseRe: Lingering Close
Willy Tarreau
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/FVXLt_dn895s-UYg-5Vvq8j95Ig/
480420
1164518
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?
Willy Tarreau
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/fPQAQJiq88khOHnxO1kP1AXHHcI/
480419
1164506
Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?Re: #429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
Willy Tarreau
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/tNI7DDlQnZ9bf9bEW0U43ggEx3M/
480418
1164499
Re: Lingering CloseRe: Lingering Close
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/1OJ4co_KG5-eUXbjsRXwn1dLH6g/
480417
1164518
#429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?#429: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?
Mark Nottingham
2013-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/noEy5vMxbs7ic0m9RUgImtQURWk/
480416
1164499
40 Messages