[ietf-smtp] ietf-smtp@ietf.org Description[ietf-smtp] ietf-smtp@ietf.org Description
Дилян Палаузов
2021-05-27
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/rDHUds1aDULK5tvdajpJJLWbsJY/
3038440
1956242
[ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?[ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John R. Levine
2021-05-24
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hUAuZfbFeU-iOl4f3cYXBOTNA5U/
3037225
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/GowOmauL4u2Z5GcS0UZDWFOl5f8/
3037274
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John Levine
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/trL2bGrm_34nhWqLbSZdlqjCNeM/
3037525
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/wLnTubM9c5ZQKLhc--a1f6rOZFU/
3037558
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Jiankang Yao
2021-05-26
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/VkEQs7PKOMdEQpyn1Nc4Lj2YLt8/
3037993
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Viktor Dukhovni
2021-05-26
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/2qdemmArThasDgOg1xByxIJ7MhU/
3038095
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Ned Freed
2021-05-30
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/G-kmYxsWZUkM-5M7zspSBLiGzvE/
3039156
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-05-31
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/y8Xk4cAwAFMg_w_2jQMRh8t6kxs/
3039179
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Ned Freed
2021-06-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/fIfbMpL4HxYGApoI_Cy-TLKYnlc/
3039613
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Alessandro Vesely
2021-06-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ioc3U2dfemcdqUUByTfeCpab1kY/
3039647
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-06-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Y2R3R_VclPBybWy8fpisF_Ct65Q/
3039674
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Dave Crocker
2021-06-04
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/gvjdmGelIpXsLOG0S6jyOEgfTmA/
3040839
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Sam Varshavchik
2021-06-04
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/TLYVDoEBS6a9wT6oN_2yBInt4WQ/
3040922
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Dave Crocker
2021-06-04
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/4DiV4v1LQEKbF6u2gmDYMznoSA0/
3040925
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-06-04
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/tr6qPgp6PO3_uYP8BtOGzimatCc/
3040935
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-06-04
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/wpBv8eOhrzLYm5HLZzadPQ0v3qc/
3040927
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Dave Crocker
2021-06-04
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/7Z0Ccb9fXymYIpDo-THaK5SSaiI/
3040942
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-06-05
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/j7Z8FCTGGBh2xwyiTN_LQie3Klw/
3041002
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Dave Crocker
2021-06-05
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/woPqI_q2RwATAYrnqdPiS7l5EjM/
3041054
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-06-05
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/XhZLmx9sWnRUSgJLC4laAtiQ5Mo/
3041067
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Alessandro Vesely
2021-06-06
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hc9LoLpTiljBPxcCHu6uhRcuraw/
3041167
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Dave Crocker
2021-06-06
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/oLUdU6FVl1_0TLVX-DZfHUBpQ1Y/
3041168
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-06-06
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/DBKGmFZ994krhT9P8GVJmZF3TeY/
3041172
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John Levine
2021-06-06
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/IGSe3L4FCcztKxwPbLZ98ssib8Q/
3041182
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Viktor Dukhovni
2021-06-07
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/b6FfPUB3DaQ5QV0XeuGGwCbMmCU/
3041275
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Valdis Kl ē tnieks
2021-06-06
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/frAD4vOZtso40b27gGI3nvo3OOA/
3041184
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John Levine
2021-06-05
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/PBQbJqAjdV9o6zzQSajb1swirEU/
3041057
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
Viktor Dukhovni
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/lJoj55IVRuNl3LimgEtn5MZRHQk/
3037557
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John C Klensin
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/RJ4viu-toH85_aW_2tSxh2_ENxg/
3037583
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
John Levine
2021-05-26
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ovb9YwArJAZ7ra4k-01yT_1mwuY/
3037720
1955642
Re: [ietf-smtp] Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing listRe: [ietf-smtp] Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing list
Alessandro Vesely
2021-05-24
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/kUhlTQqlY3-cA3FO1i3MhE6zy_E/
3036997
1955523
Re: [ietf-smtp] Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing listRe: [ietf-smtp] Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing list
Kaspar Etter
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/5zvBVnxEaQOx1wTlgOdQgTSTRms/
3037355
1955523
Re: [ietf-smtp] Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing listRe: [ietf-smtp] Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing list
Viktor Dukhovni
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/vC3b1Q6_Elqe2pA5Eq-s6evXP8o/
3037501
1955523
Re: [ietf-smtp] Terminology, was Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing listRe: [ietf-smtp] Terminology, was Followup to your reply on the IETF-SMTP mailing list
John Levine
2021-05-25
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/OqfT4ZHOsadwJiwHvA6IvdqkWLk/
3037528
1955523
[ietf-smtp] RFC 8601, clarification needed[ietf-smtp] RFC 8601, clarification needed
David Bürgin
2021-05-23
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/CaIjba2H81UxNPun_yHnK1oSbPI/
3036857
1955441
Re: [ietf-smtp] RFC 8601, clarification neededRe: [ietf-smtp] RFC 8601, clarification needed
John Levine
2021-05-23
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/MCVw7i3WRSILFJTXpEtfmauRpuA/
3036877
1955441
Re: [ietf-smtp] RFC 8601, clarification neededRe: [ietf-smtp] RFC 8601, clarification needed
Alessandro Vesely
2021-05-24
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/euyjFHrJIfdi5O08O-7TkRtvKZQ/
3037133
1955441
[ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles[ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles
Kaspar Etter
2021-05-14
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/BY2Bxm7RErzeHbhd35yJvNmUZiY/
3034063
1954138
Re: [ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principlesRe: [ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles
Bron Gondwana
2021-05-17
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/rKfK97LSoV7kYQFIX2Lku7oI9aE/
3034552
1954138
83 Messages