Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was CuriousRe: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
Paul Smith
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/L-YXjM95yoPNCRdX7KOHztiPm0o/
2907312
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Pete Resnick
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/14916xqJuZpD_x1gZuABSHyIivY/
2907291
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Pete Resnick
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/zD-d6whGawws2IdlwgQYHHfZRHU/
2907285
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was CuriousRe: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
John C Klensin
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/dRLNiUaBNcCIiLjCjuAFu_N0HaE/
2907259
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was CuriousRe: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
Hector Santos
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Yo0c1_9WatcE2FUHrlploiiIh_8/
2907255
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was CuriousRe: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
John R Levine
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/4mW-0wtSetxt0uHqJRmQnJHB7O8/
2907252
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was CuriousRe: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
Brandon Long
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ABLYEehwI-_97LswowPcwqzr-cQ/
2907251
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was CuriousRe: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
John Levine
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/eqgTgIn0yiIpCt0pz9wu6VWHyZU/
2907231
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Hector Santos
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/lWFd-MK-aIXadHBx_cWpzg4KL6Q/
2907129
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John C Klensin
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/rDGArOfD3iDstkOl3nQ0IX3pWlc/
2907118
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Hector Santos
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/z_PPdBK1wY19Vj0jz5tvgffXxnE/
2907117
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Michael Richardson
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/p2IvxHoZ-3i75KbwrJ55h5qM8eI/
2907010
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Dilyan Palauzov
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Ox45UDnTvTHwFfTIpt5BqoWv0EE/
2906930
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John Levine
2020-07-21
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/GMc8_DapUhUsaC5Ssa8UQM5Jl18/
2906858
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Michael Peddemors
2020-07-20
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/sbypLx-RDAQ6PEj6_DeKAV7Xib0/
2906743
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John Levine
2020-07-20
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/0Vi0WVBVwRaXLvnpNeEPhVS1zt0/
2906665
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Alessandro Vesely
2020-07-20
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/rM1zgukVrYehBwDASfqNccAK66U/
2906452
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John C Klensin
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/VN_9giWG7jdQIbW4VevGX1-AOsc/
2906333
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Arnt Gulbrandsen
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/NbmAmA2tA3Cohlu-y3neYI9lOYQ/
2906328
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John C Klensin
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/cIMaldRhE6dfQWfT4KcLGbQWTMs/
2906325
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John Levine
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/XLkquC_Gn9mGJQ4QbOfv7FSZ8Yw/
2906320
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Arnt Gulbrandsen
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/N69nKLVW_JPpbWSbLh3zSVZxSYo/
2906313
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John Levine
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/E7LNSR_SOuVubxJc5s8bVoN732s/
2906304
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Jeremy Harris
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hrQEL_5VaQ1-c8UDXzJNYlGHEMM/
2906289
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John C Klensin
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/tSD9lg4PeQwvALkyF5h_ALNH4R0/
2906263
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John Levine
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/3BFRQV98BbRbHJDB2aiJZfsF3n8/
2906248
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
E Sam
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/DacBr_rPmczzQmLBkpmXMk_LXVE/
2906245
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John C Klensin
2020-07-19
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/rwO8gteYc48GAexD7JSuBDo0zB0/
2906236
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
E Sam
2020-07-18
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/WgznyiIEBMwbEQ3Ho0I_-n80UgM/
2906220
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John C Klensin
2020-07-18
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/9vHwSyd1SMXQsof6YUCvjqcob3M/
2906205
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
E Sam
2020-07-18
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/PvGK3S70okZsWdYl6iRABXgVr_A/
2906203
1905235
Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
John C Klensin
2020-07-17
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/9G40AdY4uRIxhSbw7AmeVk4_Vis/
2906063
1905235
[ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?[ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
Michael Peddemors
2020-07-17
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/myQM9K9-X-ILawhGYtrvHdshhkE/
2906049
1905235
[ietf-smtp] emailcore - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 108[ietf-smtp] emailcore - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 108
"IETF Secretariat"
2020-07-16
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/vqn3NJbSDHDnUyKuKzr4el58q6k/
2905590
1905096
Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?
John C Klensin
2020-07-14
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/8B_Kvodp9plOWx0i_rf-G9WC9gY/
2904073
1903780
Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?
Jiankang Yao
2020-07-13
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/a_NlqqqpBeSGCaVVN1VvkjRULYc/
2902888
1903780
Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?
Jiankang Yao
2020-07-13
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Sz6zq4VUpv05yEgNzGiSMuSLUrM/
2902884
1903780
Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?
John C Klensin
2020-07-12
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/o3FRkbfc_IM4gKuqwYyW4kWTmqU/
2902631
1903780
Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?
John R Levine
2020-07-12
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/opSRoW5JWdc-0JOpeb1BcX1FbnE/
2902626
1903780
Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?Re: [ietf-smtp] Are A-label and U-label addresses supposed to be equivalent ?
John C Klensin
2020-07-12
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/XuKnXMRggErl9BzSYqyJO5CNmtA/
2902619
1903780