RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !
scott bradner
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4KaT2Z-yemmRRjXazYQHTUUDkBQ/
600092
1346384
Re: a note about the scenariosRe: a note about the scenarios
John C Klensin
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/hy15Yy-ANHS0rl79RowWkKbq290/
600091
1346382
Re: Poll: Restructuring questionsRe: Poll: Restructuring questions
Henrik Levkowetz
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/97_mxSd6Tyd2t0yp5h7Vqub3XCQ/
600090
1346381
My views on the Scenario O & CMy views on the Scenario O & C
Bob Hinden
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/wqoOJODioS0BACqoyUXAnL_ox3I/
600089
1346379
Re: Poll: Restructuring questionsRe: Poll: Restructuring questions
John C Klensin
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/1_umnA-xdXpPjiULiPK5sKqK1-U/
600088
1346381
Re: future meetingsRe: future meetings
Marcia Beaulieu
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Dl56P0SeymGtSW3Aa9PF28bCLDY/
600087
1346383
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !
Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/8TSJj9EoktHPGZ3tkfnvroGCkOU/
600086
1346384
Re: Poll: Restructuring questionsRe: Poll: Restructuring questions
Ole Jacobsen
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/BG08EMQBrlBxeUE7K1p5nYpNS64/
600085
1346381
Re: Poll: Restructuring questionsRe: Poll: Restructuring questions
avri
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/3XWHdBh0trjcNJWsSCgeqCHvdnA/
600084
1346381
Re: a note about the scenariosRe: a note about the scenarios
Tim Chown
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/q6AF39PfU6btLinx47eFpE2aSaY/
600083
1346382
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?
graham.travers
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/u35g76RiQUwFJPfCRMtYnG3WW3E/
600082
1346380
Poll: Restructuring questionsPoll: Restructuring questions
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/h7OQXBaBQYWGi6LUgcpB8P93ajQ/
600081
1346381
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Jeffrey Hutzelman
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/tZqlB4iYLc7kj8IXNK3Ntt07pIc/
600080
1346385
Re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !Re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !
Spencer Dawkins
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/p_cDQoTxtU6IbTH7r3nYf6FwAk4/
600079
1346384
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !
Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/0gizqn7dn-uJKnyUClll33eynNc/
600078
1346384
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?
Tony Hain
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/jNN4dTOl6kKgXIuCuZBf-BAcd9c/
600077
1346380
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Tony Hain
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/mbluM02hhvx3LKU-5vRmTg7Sp-E/
600076
1346385
a note about the scenariosa note about the scenarios
John Loughney
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/p4b-VaPKGSB_3aFaDWEcbhWJ-ZE/
600075
1346382
future meetingsfuture meetings
Michael Richardson
2004-09-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/kYsgn-X946rpAD9f-o2VTqlRx78/
600074
1346383
Scenario C (was: Scenario O)Scenario C (was: Scenario O)
Kai Henningsen
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/F0TzuoBaa7nPgECbjJX-FwPfa1c/
600073
1346396
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRe: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Kai Henningsen
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/63sZYWSux-7iJW7zEDgpIy-Iqy0/
600072
1346396
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !
Joel M. Halpern
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/lYAwLotMjEZrE9MHaX7acfzsjBY/
600071
1346384
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !
scott bradner
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/xTcgK1UD7c50q8UeeUMPMtH2iDk/
600070
1346384
Scenario C or Scenario O ?Scenario C or Scenario O ?
Sally Floyd
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/5K9vTnhlqAJAc0aHedgxyx4XWqg/
600069
1346380
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !
Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/vBvItCzIvAT_0A0X654Pe6qN5K4/
600068
1346384
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)
Michael Richardson
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yquTZ3CK5GvnoX0yH3_InAF2NrA/
600067
1346397
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)
Vernon Schryver
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4ixV2sv5sM2ZcPO3QJQpPuWphkk/
600066
1346397
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)
Pekka Savola
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/XK2LRarm9eZOx58zE_oQrADiN-M/
600065
1346397
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)
Michael Richardson
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/8JkdcuqkHWT7R84M18CrQDSQxDA/
600064
1346397
Re: Layer Violation (on the reorganization process)Re: Layer Violation (on the reorganization process)
John C Klensin
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MVGDT6pZhDuXu_4xNU84IdR3Hgc/
600063
1346386
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/hpPffA2qprkBGaxBnmIfXgRSnZM/
600062
1346385
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
scott bradner
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/rHWCSGypYIpSoHuFP5n3Kb_VjLg/
600061
1346385
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
John C Klensin
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/-BHZjf4vjCo5XGEocr6CJSU13AU/
600060
1346385
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
John C Klensin
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/6tXLofEH6Oq5_61_EP7WOHSZQjs/
600059
1346385
Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRe: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/qISLdc7lisHZCnMRB3Z6lGC4Yj0/
600058
1346396
Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRe: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Margaret Wasserman
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/RcrZdVhvzHVnYDqrroqqa58iCUM/
600057
1346396
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/QnhqjqZBhcQ7xsuRKqdWvU7suhY/
600056
1346385
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Joel M. Halpern
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sMPJBFckEYnekkATT6H0QY5Cy68/
600055
1346385
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/bUDwVV2FWO8a3iO715N2Zot3dXo/
600054
1346385
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from hereRE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here
Margaret Wasserman
2004-09-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/fe_3mzHuJG181zuhstr7V59TBrU/
600053
1346385