RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Alexander Nevalennyy
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Rt1DfgQD3tzuTyzAhSmP6e2pOg8/
2322546
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/TsDPPfg_q_U20tFKLPnRvMUtn6E/
2322531
1339031
RE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFCRE: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC
mohamed.boucadair
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/IENk5QqISvq3tTOfHam2nomE0ko/
2322528
1684593
RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Mani, Mehdi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MuYvTUrf2xuMnmCU32f-tfAXeLQ/
2322527
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Naeem Khademi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/t9sGu4Xdi04vyPh0uLhQ_3mfLWE/
2322523
1339031
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Jari Arkko
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yyZNwU4epwCFjn8jp5I_sYbjm_Y/
2322513
1684293
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/momdVOgl42nH4xVA9HFwN0XH8yg/
2322507
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Mani, Mehdi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/874DSjlAu-REu8Ydg9smNPfmSSA/
2322505
1339031
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Mani, Mehdi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/rEHnZdCKEcf8PPFBbOboHwc9pQg/
2322503
1339031
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Naeem Khademi
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Cljhx84WZWabX2Ju85TPuYs25MQ/
2322502
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Jari Arkko
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/VyYU1EC3VqYGv_3X7IBYL5hK8fE/
2322493
1684293
Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current PracticeRe: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice
Xavi Vilajosana Guillen
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MgLcXVK4qp160ljitx-2o_Idcb8/
2322484
1680366
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Matthew Kerwin
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sC_Vk9OqQ0CrH0pO7yNAGpHVVJU/
2322450
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Dan Harkins
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/nFji65-8s9xy1cnRd1_OSwqCDdw/
2322449
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Arturo Servin
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/XOXzvn2v8JLU9zLwoaZkJ3wpbsg/
2322424
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Randy Bush
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Uf6y9rCVYed6M77m6H6V7eL99TQ/
2322423
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Dan Harkins
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ognWXlNeE1c7hbjj6YgyXH5D-IQ/
2322420
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Alejandro Acosta
2017-01-31
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/F-SUYEivFnsLUnlzOnHO7f9bgps/
2322393
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Randy Bush
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/EUnlgKzvb2wcHi8KvE9_vhZOp1s/
2322368
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Brian E Carpenter
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/wS8SKltWyADcXMCu8VixGkRoR5Q/
2322367
1684293
RE: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02RE: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02
Bernie Volz (volz)
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/PVkoyr6RI1Hf9GpVrs4NHwVB-B0/
2322355
1684116
Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02
Ted Lemon
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/uOjXJg-HwRHumnopENwCr649UO8/
2322344
1684116
Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02
jouni.nospam
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/5QMCEPoPaQSdifgtfX2hhkGCpdc/
2322329
1684116
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Emily Shepherd
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/cgFAmojW6i-_x009kfz1SOlCdSQ/
2322316
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/SaTbpt61Itp3HvMcybVB2wn8lts/
2322315
1684293
Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Dan Harkins
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/RVktG5_jpa6fQPC-Zq1MIQjaYTU/
2322277
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Emily Shepherd
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/9uwtgXnCc0lc_EGMYXQRNVhuHL4/
2322271
1684293
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Dan Harkins
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ISBZrg-a8NLNc-oZiBU71vZeb-c/
2322259
1339031
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Jari Arkko
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/tk9gcrLmsVnTY51OApDvDsA9K3E/
2322257
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/_rfaE1Wc3o41KLDdJW5Wuq8GCMs/
2322248
1684293
RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/wF-wtu5FXAOQiML-zoBgCwSwGZY/
2322245
1339031
Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current PracticeRe: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
Jari Arkko
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4PAj8frRmCemJaT4DLJ_PorCKDg/
2322244
1683162
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Jari Arkko
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/U_BvZuBztPBKJIEMvuro7UpDwfg/
2322237
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Rich Kulawiec
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Rf0xuUfbR7i2rrDKGxgoRxFLkV8/
2322231
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Paul Wouters
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2iQzxkLdvglW-Kmn_WAhGYUniYQ/
2322214
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Saifi Khan
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/qTnORMCg8BypRfP7nJ9Me6QGqj4/
2322207
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Christian de Larrinaga
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/m3Vou3J-O_nwtfjpR_hx0yiC0CY/
2322198
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Melinda Shore
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/jyra0WmpImYnYAstapuVA-048L8/
2322196
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
John C Klensin
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/pWxLHQ_QAwJKtUAoYbUwcZhEGj8/
2322192
1684293
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2017-01-30
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/KrrV2Nkm9l3N5NZYyVG_NiJMLV8/
2322187
1684293
40 Messages