Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Keith Moore
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/tdJ3enN9AoFMgXuyikr4vTFeZ_Q/
3022855
1948585
Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Masataka Ohta
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/V1mQKkjlhUkaB34LQuzSfB0_P-A/
3022846
1948585
Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Masataka Ohta
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/TLF228Zec3Vi8jeOnLl76csY6zg/
3022841
1948585
RE: New Approach For Discussing IPngRE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
Khaled Omar
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/b5dA_2L5BOkeisyA3c39xIvHlNY/
3022839
1949211
Re: New Approach For Discussing IPngRe: New Approach For Discussing IPng
Stephane Bortzmeyer
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/U8HbqvShSl8EjNfHk0q6aKPCdGc/
3022818
1949211
Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
Stephane Bortzmeyer
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/D-ehPW_M1HhKdyvZMgMT3NfvDXM/
3022816
1949211
RE: New Approach For Discussing IPngRE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
Vasilenko Eduard
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ZSX7IC9GoJ7SXE_totWjcLr2xjU/
3022812
1949211
New Approach For Discussing IPngNew Approach For Discussing IPng
Brian E Carpenter
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/keo-Y6a_OhR_hu6k1OhkGAdkcNg/
3022791
1949211
Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/IsiUPs22zEFNqWZfIKyRmY1M0S4/
3022783
1949211
Re: San Francisco?Re: San Francisco?
John C Klensin
2021-04-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/u0hGVN3dQZ2mxFK_yLYcI7mqu7g/
3022762
1949305
Re: San Francisco?Re: San Francisco?
Michael Tuexen
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/q9Cw3Aorp9PYv7KEeDooJw7jY_k/
3022742
1949305
Re: New-comersRe: New-comers
scott
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Wyaj27p7mENUwTW4ny5XJxPeF-k/
3022728
1949212
RE: San Francisco?RE: San Francisco?
Andrew Campling
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ivY8zFzy2TKw2k1Pwg69svycrLA/
3022727
1949305
Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Ofer Inbar
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ketEEjtrTvXI6rkK6lAnXTOqCc4/
3022711
1948585
Re: San Francisco?Re: San Francisco?
Jared Mauch
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/E_i7-9eDZLnNZmXkwOes1by41sE/
3022703
1949305
Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
Keith Moore
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/gDyoblI02zzXMsp57qgVDz5_0qw/
3022693
1948585
Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/UAakKReQbHt1fiJpZaBxYkbdprs/
3022692
1948585
RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
Khaled Omar
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/wF_AfTGZ6IAS9UwXEapPqHIg7aY/
3022690
1949211
Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 18 06:00:02 2021Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 18 06:00:02 2021
John Levine
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/bg9aDdaFuJmycVw7SNshRrVCJTw/
3022687
1949357
Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Bron Gondwana
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/iQg9Q999si9CSYFKNPCYWMZXQJ0/
3022660
1948585
Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Bron Gondwana
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/e2TDT-8-YBIxbr02ZmytpaUqbJ8/
3022659
1948585
Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
Joe Touch
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/F327uvPMLNiVNPITB8bbU6nt8DQ/
3022657
1949211
Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/BxJpCdqVcIYXUcfxUTe3BvZEN7E/
3022656
1949211
What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
Keith Moore
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/S4SxmcirVtxYl-dqIWkg7Ds-ASc/
3022650
1948585
Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Lloyd W
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4OYVPHIE0UnGAzLU7N49lcRM70I/
3022649
1946886
Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
John C Klensin
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MOUTm_IKjjdQWNgp5POoFK7uVWQ/
3022644
1946886
Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
Michael Thomas
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/vx0Zk0QTfWyPECfL2xeU8SpzlkQ/
3022634
1948585
Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
Michael Richardson
2021-04-18
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/h-f5blBD4naGC9n_vxWIBItY_3o/
3022625
1948585
Re: New-comersRe: New-comers
Jim Fenton
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/XSe6pZapxlmvj3JtOkUZj9XcBz8/
3022617
1949212
Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
Michael Thomas
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Yri6OS4Ioxe3fBtjAPcjfS4KbR0/
3022613
1948585
Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
John C Klensin
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/M_KffgGdbKOsPqgF7swOmY9Y4Ew/
3022606
1946886
RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
Larry Masinter
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/lSMSx16bNGAGnCM2wyfsuveOCnQ/
3022605
1948585
San Francisco?San Francisco?
Marc Petit-Huguenin
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/s76OLSHGc5d6JgTOfuzthiRqwJQ/
3022594
1949305
Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
John C Klensin
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/vwXiBWHTHfwWYfzxJ5l206RA17Q/
3022589
1948585
RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
Larry Masinter
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/_ApuyQupMsLpIWdNkjWIgRMDIIs/
3022584
1948585
Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
Michael Thomas
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ddwu1n0FETpDSiJyAGKFrK8FoZY/
3022581
1948585
RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
Khaled Omar
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/xtvXqEvY2hBaaePgw6u86XUlP1U/
3022573
1949211
Re: New-comersRe: New-comers
tom petch
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/B98E6VgyoMXtbx_yQmIBhLGvrwQ/
3022566
1949212
Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
S Moonesamy
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/QwBXRx68pSXu8DloA7Iwj53dRRU/
3022564
1948585
Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
John C Klensin
2021-04-17
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/RKmu57LgvkgXir9tZEVu_NQzzwM/
3022538
1948585
40 Messages