Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
Fred Baker
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/8Js5H8gngHM7rlAPENv2sqkI-k4
2511320
1755869
Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
Fred Baker
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/vM8dVpiziha5dC2BhXMGrcI_vi0
2511315
1755869
Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
Jen Linkova
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/hUqPEz9v-_fLfMtTpy-3TaREI00
2511313
1755869
Re: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txtRe: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt
Bob Hinden
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aOVPQLaCrMdOJSDfsRFIzNmPqQ8
2511308
1757103
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txtRe: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt
Brian E Carpenter
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/nZq20G_60c-7DD2pFovC6_48F80
2511306
1757103
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txtRe: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt
Fernando Gont
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/CBdCnOu_Y6ZF59MhhFRgi2ZE5Q0
2511289
1757103
Re: Upleveling discussion (was Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host))Re: Upleveling discussion (was Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host))
Fernando Gont
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/zk2CjIbNH7hXAA9aqzdpsUQS_I4
2511284
1754968
Re: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txtRe: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZE_RMnVDZPuir0MvDopxK1d30XA
2511267
1757103
RE: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?RE: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
mohamed.boucadair
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/B7HZ7MYcl5hret10R4nJa8OWHGQ
2511242
1755869
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txtFwd: New Version Notification for draft-hinden-ipv4flag-00.txt
Bob Hinden
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aTIYDqLPmE_sHx_ycFOsSOLXmXQ
2511240
1757103
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Brian E Carpenter
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/MVpqkykQZYb-uvlA0wIoCe4AQF8
2511197
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Brian E Carpenter
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ad1o5hbgCQbTEl7Dg5x2aTV3SZc
2511191
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
joel jaeggli
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aNtzfgAIUOwSGyz5WsdNGNkAkws
2511190
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-11-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/jT7CwR0OOq0wv1Joex63Mw9AivA
2511175
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Mark Andrews
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/3AWBoP6Ar_f1VtmQPm2RUFqy5_s
2510897
1756504
Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
Mark Andrews
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/v3d6D40etWZfxDjlW1h8yPvD_q4
2510889
1755869
Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
james woodyatt
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/T5zZ2EAAA2Hrs1mSm_sCssGOl_M
2510880
1755869
Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
Michael Richardson
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Q962GHSVt7rbaZhF3nCUyH_m-9c
2510866
1755869
Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
Michael Richardson
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/F_IUb4pBZmRvbJorAg5RULFPVvY
2510865
1755869
Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
james woodyatt
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LnAGtXu9Txt4J_ox5AbU3ph9OsA
2510857
1755869
Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
Ca By
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/zGd23vFsbh12scciIdYJ8iK91k4
2510845
1755869
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Philip Homburg
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/5hWf0wxSTFJnkPAZsCxH6gXi0wc
2510805
1756504
Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
Tim Chown
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/mtZubWAxIlwcwxUcV5JVdFawdDQ
2510801
1755869
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Tim Chown
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/C2zDOBJ4wqxbaDgL1fBySk82VKg
2510794
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/8hAkcJmXsnJqe1ohUDo8DDRsGz8
2510760
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/7VYPS8YKzup-FLIM9hkQXAEBrCU
2510757
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
David Farmer
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/RkZSybVt_zqbc9h4BylPRMRl_As
2510742
1756504
Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)Re: PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
Ca By
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/XQlURK7RI7vCNvMs3uu4Wyr6zmo
2510717
1755869
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Erik Kline
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/lFih0pYUlYVfkA1y3JE1sX7e9VI
2510635
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Markku Savela
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Uvc3KFW3L1ChLZ88E525Nu_gJ7U
2510634
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Markku Savela
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/99Wr-lP6HC3N4bfykeg8cNggYyY
2510633
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ijYbbbhefj2yIJmoUKOO2ujItPc
2510628
1756504
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Brian E Carpenter
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Ck2cpIzKZxVdY-D15sPGPZpFcMc
2510604
1756504
PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)PCP, and 6434bis (was Re: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?)
Tim Chown
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/YHoi4cAYno7JYseJNneuAw0-lFE
2510603
1755869
Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"Re: IPv4 traffic on "ietf-v6ONLY"
Tim Chown
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/DC2Bu1LqGGG1zIH9z34D5NeaQJY
2510584
1756504
Confirm consensus to adopt <draft-troan-6man-ndpioiana>Confirm consensus to adopt <draft-troan-6man-ndpioiana>
Bob Hinden
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_X8mhQSVobPxaG3ipoMVszeWpic
2510493
1756886
RE: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?RE: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
mohamed.boucadair
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/gkXKjRWYr02tnUOrWrJ4Qd_3GUk
2510458
1755869
RE: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?RE: IPv6 only host NAT64 requirements?
mohamed.boucadair
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/nZStMAzkG4JehWqYzqwJddQzRDU
2510457
1755869
Re: report on jabber use on ESSID "ietf-v6ONLY" and "ietf-nat64"Re: report on jabber use on ESSID "ietf-v6ONLY" and "ietf-nat64"
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/l_M0F7E-AwSLD-B4vgYCZ1X_-DU
2510291
1756804
Re: report on jabber use on ESSID "ietf-v6ONLY" and "ietf-nat64"Re: report on jabber use on ESSID "ietf-v6ONLY" and "ietf-nat64"
Brian E Carpenter
2017-11-16
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ouF6Hbp2cB-iolgzSw9VHtz5mWk
2510277
1756804
34725 Messages