RE: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/WIBD1JLmQY3tWFGYdkaB2-jcGmk/
2885650
1897005
RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
James Guichard
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/qOlsMTslCcvO_rFhAx5p7ObH6oE/
2885640
1895241
Re: Interested in wireless ?Re: Interested in wireless ?
Loganaden Velvindron
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/UYuNEFxQDl-taYJIKltOOjbBZX4/
2885638
1897345
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/yRrTPvLammcsLkNCEkF_PDKYXQk/
2885636
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Mark Smith
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/sRjoHE1xxTVf70hWTtw_mzsYFpc/
2885635
1897089
Interested in wireless ?Interested in wireless ?
Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/6nV1s6li2wElKJwMU55iQuDW-rs/
2885626
1897345
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/DZR7qtNLuKdmNgkGP97MkyOdgho/
2885612
1897089
I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-00.txtI-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-00.txt
internet-drafts
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/TPvJ5vUhnUDoIUGlnkZ0wXUeML0/
2885609
1897333
Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/t6mwqNTafwA6QPnoa9TRqTO-Foo/
2885607
1895241
RE: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method"RE: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method"
Giuseppe Fioccola
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Nb4Mx0drIg-dbpBkCuNWWtL34Gc/
2885599
1895240
Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
刘毅松
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/zMCDG38LGRoyCvCGJqxUPbz0wh0/
2885574
1897005
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Mark Smith
2020-05-30
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/XIem9gUIqHBs2B3pzzaly1MMZG4/
2885572
1897089
Re: slaac-renum: New rev of draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum-08.txt)Re: slaac-renum: New rev of draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum-08.txt)
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/vexvRK3i2sMnRwy_BgyBXUnjtyw/
2885525
1895706
Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Tom Herbert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/epvQFvj9S7pAKVnuiejKWzybSyQ/
2885520
1895241
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Kris Michielsen
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/knoaXgtjpA0_EQNGCBh6NAGX9_A/
2885518
1895241
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Richard Vallee (rvallee)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/PT0yG_QswgxXFLEYpDBqbPrRww0/
2885515
1895241
RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
James Guichard
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/jv0Vrpkc8M_uhGeuee-ffUp_wDY/
2885512
1895241
Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Tom Herbert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/y06l04FAf_h2-gY4q_4zZKH5rU8/
2885503
1895241
Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Greg Mirsky
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/JT1q8UvsxKI1sefOohszsNkutL4/
2885495
1895241
RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
James Guichard
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/BBS41JNg6q_GexHcCwU5CMmIqcU/
2885490
1895241
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Zafar Ali (zali)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OwFnmHUlqDEyI2lChvvQ93H-WkQ/
2885476
1895241
Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Dirk Steinberg
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/49yGITywNF0VqxE9_Z257JoBuEM/
2885471
1895241
Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method"Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method"
Bob Hinden
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/KgwKQ1wD_Hcs0NdObxb8OFd9c34/
2885468
1895240
Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Bob Hinden
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/JXdqF5n6ZSkctsO7wT0xsJPXCdg/
2885467
1895241
Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Tom Herbert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/YJzz9B2IfbnuqB5rlOJBZsk81_U/
2885449
1895241
RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/8j9BmlmHRPGAS_hpbn4DDNIap68/
2885444
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Greg Mirsky
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZUEtU5YwB2PCJOY8ZG3yMgUqoC4/
2885443
1897089
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Francois Clad (fclad)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/qfgNDZwgJfRdr6WNuQgtZlaN7f8/
2885442
1895241
Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Toerless Eckert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/59wfZJsetZNBKIHnKynu2q5H6dM/
2885440
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Greg Mirsky
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/lmMspqe5bzzb93rINdlthwlPbIk/
2885438
1897089
comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
神明達哉
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/BOY0ZGViRWtQ5q7RqyV2e0x01dc/
2885434
1895241
Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Rakesh Gandhi
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LR53Jk4ru3Scu5cOjlSpiiIKwQY/
2885423
1895241
RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/rSVIZaWGdgXJkOASk56pu9FZt5M/
2885414
1897089
One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Toerless Eckert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/UH45mjzBe1eYxcEr8ceCpfCNrBA/
2885399
1897089
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/C5FgfhYat9RqsMY_VfjIYaKcNHo/
2885396
1896216
RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/72Z3p0-Lt1EVPSThnzDjJGK9FWA/
2885393
1897005
RE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/uHwHwyKx0VWHVpqn_ryMz1pa7p0/
2885391
1896216
RE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/NH_mjj38oS8QwenCjTd_W7kT-HI/
2885385
1896216
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Tony Przygienda
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/hmCQfh0LDIT1blqi01xfNo8VVB4/
2885381
1896216
RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Ron Bonica
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LZqu2UkfCExFMk8SjQzyx6hhKYI/
2885353
1897089