Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Zafar Ali (zali)
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/gyqvpfSkCt9fEZLdXnbrNjNOWg4/
2884726
1897005
RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
zhaofeng@caict.ac.cn
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/1ACujSD44ewBD8vZSEWChxDbMKA/
2884724
1895240
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Tom Herbert
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/hm687EkpTEPvoasvVva4VhU9lY8/
2884685
1895241
RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Michael McBride
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/GWYWH5SREgTmqM2lx8ovZHtEh_k/
2884678
1895241
Re: [spring] Limited domains ...Re: [spring] Limited domains ...
徐小虎(义先)
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/DO7vjFk2XVTsL-wQux6S2JS5jBo/
2884648
1897005
RE: Limited domains ...RE: Limited domains ...
Ron Bonica
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_9C7PkpmzTLUOzMLdS192jeqAlw/
2884639
1897005
RE: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SIDRE: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SID
Ron Bonica
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/FXSxBb74MyMXu7-o2FfnJ9FaHSE/
2884638
1896836
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Kalyani Rajaraman
2020-05-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OLAOHyjkLF5GmIHGlQWurerOzsk/
2884626
1895241
Re: [spring] Limited domains ...Re: [spring] Limited domains ...
Mark Smith
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/RKyoJT_3XO5Ge1GybltISQOCu0Y/
2884600
1897005
Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Xing Li
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/7BEokFKe4GM-tojNjA7q-YVAuBI/
2884597
1897005
Re: Limited domains ...Re: Limited domains ...
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/8T3OFdRCaC84klSn4HB-GcgGJc4/
2884595
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Fernando Gont
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/441aKWc2jMm9RQ1ga00mapnSeEU/
2884593
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Fernando Gont
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/HuSAlsmwl7L5ApPBWOdAt2z6_oA/
2884592
1897005
Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Mark Smith
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/-TCvEPKDnx1JaifC4MPM3uGPn-o/
2884589
1897005
RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Ron Bonica
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/lJ9uZaywS9uqFj0DFAm9jZNAeEQ/
2884587
1897005
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Tetsuya Murakami
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/3d4NuHyENUypDkDm5Cshl_FbkaA/
2884586
1895241
Limited domains ...Limited domains ...
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/eukWufHfApFJBqiDQPoCB5FrBmc/
2884585
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Zafar Ali (zali)
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/SPOrWtJKwFgotEAG-PSUvdaRk3A/
2884580
1897005
RE: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SIDRE: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SID
Adrian Farrel
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LuQVWAWnhwJFXc4oisc170Ewhxs/
2884578
1896836
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Andrew Alston
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/7RQed4N2ilr6KTK_AeNVJkN9Shg/
2884577
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Zafar Ali (zali)
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZLbweTsMwlFJrtvWbJa-b_HEG6c/
2884572
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/h-A_329gzppep_KDJlMLTy-47pg/
2884570
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/WlGKGi2YrdT_MQ1X5WSMXrDzavg/
2884565
1897005
RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Ron Bonica
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/NdYWu7xeX4fmA5A5upb8TSyAdnU/
2884558
1897005
RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/vyx5z-VXQ4i1XUqWGA3R28q1POY/
2884552
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_Vh6KKgtgFIeJon3bUdeOJZF9Qs/
2884549
1897005
Re: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SIDRe: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SID
Mark Smith
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/IqVImH0UUIO4WxMhr8HLBBdlXP8/
2884548
1896836
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Erik Kline
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/NAhZ2aNqnqWLGSBNHAfhPiLIuZw/
2884542
1897005
Re: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SIDRe: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SID
John Scudder
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/bB-jxCrcLKDwB6eHqZMlt9kq6FM/
2884537
1896836
RE: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Manfredi (US), Albert E
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/f-19Sdvj3ajka60W0Rnp_Nwo38g/
2884536
1897005
Re: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SIDRe: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SID
Mark Smith
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/X06Tj-j03AXYfQ0UffGDKw2OlEE/
2884534
1896836
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Zafar Ali (zali)
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/n9j8-hx37Xn_I1RelaLl-nxLXd8/
2884531
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/2gjgoqBtkpEd791xt1ZJMVFMgJU/
2884527
1897005
Re: CRH Draft Update - Security Considerations SectionRe: CRH Draft Update - Security Considerations Section
John Scudder
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/9Ispdd-Kma4ZpwU8SfIS4OIL5dw/
2884523
1896845
Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Sander Steffann
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ciACMVO4xtUPsdCqToLQ4VNy1oQ/
2884519
1897005
RE: CRH Draft Update - Security Considerations SectionRE: CRH Draft Update - Security Considerations Section
Ron Bonica
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/0xWf6j2Q7A7Lxj_nh0KF7WG7_5s/
2884511
1896845
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Greg Mirsky
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/-RvDmujw4KVPuW4F1mIWxA42TgY/
2884504
1895241
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Martin Horneffer
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/nQmgurwGy5DMErIzQ7Xdt54UpWs/
2884503
1895241
RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/DrGU97I9Rkdq-UZmh-ZUabogKpc/
2884501
1897005
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Andrew Alston
2020-05-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/86ymiFoplWK1ZJdxpvmbCMSVSoU/
2884495
1897005
40 Messages