RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
James Guichard
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/jv0Vrpkc8M_uhGeuee-ffUp_wDY/
2885512
1895241
Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Tom Herbert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/y06l04FAf_h2-gY4q_4zZKH5rU8/
2885503
1895241
Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Greg Mirsky
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/JT1q8UvsxKI1sefOohszsNkutL4/
2885495
1895241
RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
James Guichard
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/BBS41JNg6q_GexHcCwU5CMmIqcU/
2885490
1895241
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Zafar Ali (zali)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OwFnmHUlqDEyI2lChvvQ93H-WkQ/
2885476
1895241
Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Dirk Steinberg
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/49yGITywNF0VqxE9_Z257JoBuEM/
2885471
1895241
Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method"Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method"
Bob Hinden
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/KgwKQ1wD_Hcs0NdObxb8OFd9c34/
2885468
1895240
Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Bob Hinden
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/JXdqF5n6ZSkctsO7wT0xsJPXCdg/
2885467
1895241
Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
Tom Herbert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/YJzz9B2IfbnuqB5rlOJBZsk81_U/
2885449
1895241
RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/8j9BmlmHRPGAS_hpbn4DDNIap68/
2885444
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Greg Mirsky
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZUEtU5YwB2PCJOY8ZG3yMgUqoC4/
2885443
1897089
Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Francois Clad (fclad)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/qfgNDZwgJfRdr6WNuQgtZlaN7f8/
2885442
1895241
Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Toerless Eckert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/59wfZJsetZNBKIHnKynu2q5H6dM/
2885440
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Greg Mirsky
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/lmMspqe5bzzb93rINdlthwlPbIk/
2885438
1897089
comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)")
神明達哉
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/BOY0ZGViRWtQ5q7RqyV2e0x01dc/
2885434
1895241
Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Rakesh Gandhi
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LR53Jk4ru3Scu5cOjlSpiiIKwQY/
2885423
1895241
RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/rSVIZaWGdgXJkOASk56pu9FZt5M/
2885414
1897089
One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?)
Toerless Eckert
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/UH45mjzBe1eYxcEr8ceCpfCNrBA/
2885399
1897089
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Robert Raszuk
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/C5FgfhYat9RqsMY_VfjIYaKcNHo/
2885396
1896216
RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/72Z3p0-Lt1EVPSThnzDjJGK9FWA/
2885393
1897005
RE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/uHwHwyKx0VWHVpqn_ryMz1pa7p0/
2885391
1896216
RE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRE: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/NH_mjj38oS8QwenCjTd_W7kT-HI/
2885385
1896216
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Tony Przygienda
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/hmCQfh0LDIT1blqi01xfNo8VVB4/
2885381
1896216
RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Ron Bonica
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LZqu2UkfCExFMk8SjQzyx6hhKYI/
2885353
1897089
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Peter Psenak
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ugomSMSAI7J65vOSexgF4DF-3mE/
2885348
1896216
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Jared Mauch
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OqBk9FmR7lMfZa1UGywQ18qLhCA/
2885344
1897089
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
John Scudder
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/9FibnPr7q9NZcSFHpG8rFOd6WQM/
2885332
1896216
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Peter Psenak
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/FLgmJL_ILTlqhSKiR7zl0v0Hn48/
2885323
1896216
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
John Scudder
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/cXunwZYQrFQzlYyo0Ud6MbGDZT4/
2885322
1896216
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Ted Lemon
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/7KZpYGXGqlaC3pcck2By-s5ydJU/
2885319
1897089
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Peter Psenak
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/06a5qFd34OqMxe-y7UsNMV5GQ5o/
2885317
1896216
RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Voyer, Daniel
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZKr63s6-clCAJCqBjTUXNg8AMMo/
2885316
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Fred Baker
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/qwcskAApq4RLyhAvqbvz0laD2yc/
2885314
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Stewart Bryant
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/li-ZWQzugI3Of9wxCrxxZdAgLK0/
2885311
1897089
RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/fxX4hRuAnb79_C5qtrGYxr2SsM8/
2885309
1897089
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
John Scudder
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/qixZkZ2uftMcFtkm4Akuchcefoo/
2885303
1896216
RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Ron Bonica
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/SgsHd4Nno2GmawrnA0CEl2AH4Yc/
2885296
1897089
Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Stewart Bryant
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/7FFO_UlWlFC-B2HW9ouVDMO5kyc/
2885277
1897089
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Sander Steffann
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/jcNYfLmk6Ku3mxFUYMVHUmAB4S4/
2885272
1897005
Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRHRe: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwer…
2020-05-29
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/U9xQaYjqtXXFSj2rDn0r81amsmU/
2885223
1896216