Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/dQQos8wM20p3r7pdXb_DdFeLr9M/
3357089
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/fAuQ1dGbFFtNfaktVboDF_wlfXY/
3357076
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Michael Richardson
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/GUIT4lVTBvdPWfgpbwp0dbQahh4/
3356961
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Trøan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/RXglWrak4GD6A-q_-dmH0vcxwow/
3356861
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZWrDeeUevfnhfdoNyLjSPIvg31s/
3356858
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
David Farmer
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ifAaNxZlWAvrmaWqvlnRwk_j8qo/
3356837
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/tO23XWlSeXgbDO713yUo6U5uPws/
3356829
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Troan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/THFiEQh2Jg8bQWr7uyg9bHeTkL4/
3356826
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/PYay52viJqyjAm6qh-XKT-x-bvY/
3356823
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Troan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/xyj7h_Of_BBuB-Nyo7uraHG8MRw/
3356817
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Ku78x---42wUrODPjLpxF09bSYY/
3356816
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/6cf7FO4giF__zjmvHBLC9IgoLGA/
3356811
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/t_saPaQhFrkuI-SiV0ZuTkTvJUA/
3356754
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Troan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OdgtInpu2PRJaNoqWz-0WhZY2uk/
3356750
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/W0Nv9pMuKZZgEbxF14_jCkfS_pw/
3356746
2079409
[IPv6] 464 CLAT in libc[IPv6] 464 CLAT in libc
Soni "They/Them" L.
2023-09-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/V2rK0DsVP1nor2x1Hfxf_TpdbLI/
3356670
2085049
Re: [IPv6] (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])Re: [IPv6] (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])
Olivier Bonaventure
2023-09-15
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/UlnwSvEbLremNai6ebHZkWBflUQ/
3356224
2084815
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Michael Richardson
2023-09-15
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/gllx6ViUyQtWpYBySC6sIjmdu-M/
3356134
2079409
Re: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-05.txtRe: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-05.txt
Dongjie (Jimmy)
2023-09-15
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/T3OkEKTxopBXOWoW97ji0ZzIplY/
3356036
2072365
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Christian Huitema
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/qMp2fNWHsqVMpwI058RL2jf6Npw/
3355915
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Brian E Carpenter
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/9xJl6kmlmqIaePaVAAmdINvVRSU/
3355903
2079409
Re: [IPv6] [EXTERNAL] Re: IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] [EXTERNAL] Re: IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Manfredi (US), Albert E
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/FCyupKSU2ISs4hALVYJAjEE-dI0/
3355895
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Brian E Carpenter
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/k-7CeYGtUA7eE98wgU_Zuu6p8y0/
3355889
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Fred Baker
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Lu_7PEnRXwFG3DKTWCj24qAbM0Q/
3355806
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Nick Buraglio
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/UFXTh11a7cfaZ16L-Kp1vPVGZSQ/
3355794
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
David Farmer
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/1PDxwNB4OosFmuOcaL0BCZncF5A/
3355754
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LB1h4cd8CE0opD4GK-_f1atlNj4/
3355538
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Trøan
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/xoqiVbgXt9XfOuKcFfBw1ORyXEY/
3355467
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/1egY--gHHAYPbrKmtl8jZiHgWeQ/
3355466
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Brian E Carpenter
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/C2qh1Vo3yl0OdQc59zmsxzP5U_s/
3355456
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/9kKDggN0_u8P60APFF0iYLrhsu0/
3355449
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Lorenzo Colitti
2023-09-14
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/SFQRLkv8fQwj2KnM1PDE7YYVT2c/
3355440
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Brian E Carpenter
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Oe0Yqmgg03RH-ZUMZst5bdYWwAk/
3355305
2079409
Re: [IPv6] MPTCP and MPQUIC for ISP redundancy using PA only, no NAT66 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])Re: [IPv6] MPTCP and MPQUIC for ISP redundancy using PA only, no NAT66 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])
Brian E Carpenter
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/xa1bxETqlrOpfjXPCJpTcJzNEv4/
3355302
2079409
Re: [IPv6] MPTCP and MPQUIC for ISP redundancy using PA only, no NAT66 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])Re: [IPv6] MPTCP and MPQUIC for ISP redundancy using PA only, no NAT66 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])
Brian E Carpenter
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/QQim83Z81Db7CSJwVQN5S-zSuEk/
3355299
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ackermann, Michael
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/EPh9SXibeSDaE4LK2uI9SOskoHM/
3355158
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Xipengxiao
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/KdFmsSLeM8NLwyorHv54Ru6gd10/
3355146
2079409
Re: [IPv6] MPTCP and MPQUIC for ISP redundancy using PA only, no NAT66 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])Re: [IPv6] MPTCP and MPQUIC for ISP redundancy using PA only, no NAT66 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]])
Ole Troan
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/nhO4uxXG-TBJHKPPH3JkZxgVimA/
3355087
2079409
Re: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-05.txtRe: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-05.txt
mohamed.boucadair
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/FDpR7OWs7-YM6GbUP-AxkUF2frw/
3355053
2072365
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Nick Buraglio
2023-09-13
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Q3MswcCYn_poc_l5LlarhXf0Oj0/
3355009
2079409