Re: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charterRe: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charter
Richard Barnes
2013-01-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/0uWoZoyuwEmwnpt5ixRse3n_SO0/
819468
1445470
Re: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charterRe: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charter
Mike Jones
2013-01-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/d4_hxAOIODHTzYmuar6FAmgSBX0/
819467
1445470
Re: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charterRe: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charter
Richard Barnes
2013-01-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/UsqF8H5qk8XJcDRpwDOVhUNRcJk/
819466
1445470
Re: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charterRe: [jose] draft revision to JOSE charter
Mike Jones
2013-01-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/417-6QWpMJD0zXzYdoPuMx-nX8E/
819465
1445470
[jose] draft revision to JOSE charter[jose] draft revision to JOSE charter
Karen O'Donoghue
2013-01-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/g2pMufUomY0ZNeowjeQR3hnaD80/
819464
1445470
Re: [jose] December 27, 2012 JOSE ReleaseRe: [jose] December 27, 2012 JOSE Release
Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS
2013-01-08
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Tsf0vQI89wca6RwwKMpYPaCSM3g/
819463
1445471
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-31
jose
/arch/msg/jose/a5ZFkyIwq4DJ4Xkul3Sd4i3x_xo/
819462
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Jim Schaad
2012-12-31
jose
/arch/msg/jose/jy17NcwzjQDbxWVNCoDy8L9bH1w/
819461
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/T-yVDxGc45dieYxrgrE6x1Cts28/
819460
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Jim Schaad
2012-12-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/sCzKEwhK9B5s9ZZCYgE7VTOF_Zk/
819459
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Jim Schaad
2012-12-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/FSIgn2sV3nQCvluBbQzBzUX4C5k/
819458
1445477
Re: [jose] Extensibility (was "Criticality")Re: [jose] Extensibility (was "Criticality")
Mike Jones
2012-12-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/3v-6tIB0FjIrnEkmWdPQcpmpNp4/
819457
1445480
[jose] December 27, 2012 JOSE Release[jose] December 27, 2012 JOSE Release
Mike Jones
2012-12-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/wUg_P1l5Y9FIJNS4eFhHBp7xptQ/
819456
1445471
[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-08.txt[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-08.txt
internet-drafts
2012-12-28
jose
/arch/msg/jose/9Tz-sY9SDjQwolCm0x-3Jb6_Elc/
819455
1445472
[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-08.txt[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-08.txt
internet-drafts
2012-12-28
jose
/arch/msg/jose/xUTrnJU1g38sEMMgn-uEVWyzfio/
819454
1445473
[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-08.txt[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-08.txt
internet-drafts
2012-12-28
jose
/arch/msg/jose/nnaA5i2fMfH4aB5dyk7sVh77kzc/
819453
1445474
[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08.txt[jose] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08.txt
internet-drafts
2012-12-28
jose
/arch/msg/jose/eCD0LpAf20gpQ2aJaDb4LeCFHk8/
819452
1445475
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-26
jose
/arch/msg/jose/nXmUlP0vKsBpjQHvW4czs4bwCfo/
819451
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Jim Schaad
2012-12-26
jose
/arch/msg/jose/JKrCGrhvBz0MtpjX2rZGGwZPG-c/
819450
1445477
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Anthony Nadalin
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/zsMXiaNDCLQQtnebv5KMG_D0iKA/
819449
1445476
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/QRx2XV2L7CzG4tD4QASIxosFOac/
819448
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/OhpCwJfF-HWYeXGriVJ14kJmzI8/
819447
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/nCI4mq1KrMVzonH72uNWpPi9Sv8/
819446
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/AohFHxVCcqr9eVoSQnVZfk94s2Y/
819445
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/8uN2h6O_fhAIf6fOqDCwNzYsf-Y/
819444
1445477
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/dTYzr4LC6NfRXT2PAQ6JOPL0_ws/
819443
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/PnvZYB98SRHU5lo7YlmrQt9OETk/
819442
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/uDvlDFLkyDDOzj9A-YVGVFtbhJ4/
819441
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ZNnjnAYTZRJctYkhv9sdpXUEKBI/
819440
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
John Bradley
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/BVsiZPIY9jgYh2iDQSnQXmQDiaM/
819439
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Manger, James H
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/xRvKdhHF53uGFt5mVn7_4Unciko/
819438
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/CZ7kdSzqSK0bJi9ciSmdWrv6frU/
819437
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
John Bradley
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/88CxR_tXqRD99itSevbeB9mEmj8/
819436
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/7gzExjq94srVvEmMzHeerwd5Vwg/
819435
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/bn42uZOofXi2hNH_zZdI-9-8-vc/
819434
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Richard Barnes
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/EDmXkW7awhjeYO_qVc1uiwLMNCw/
819433
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/-PdgnwUGLRT7EIP6LlNCcE8qMfY/
819432
1445476
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/KlhiWNas4rauO1s6iaXuY2xIFpQ/
819431
1445477
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/-wTG0iMyls4fOc45eTegIElU0oA/
819430
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ThnpuNTou11tkYUwlFH0LFjUK8I/
819429
1445476
40 Messages