Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/nCI4mq1KrMVzonH72uNWpPi9Sv8/
819446
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/AohFHxVCcqr9eVoSQnVZfk94s2Y/
819445
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/8uN2h6O_fhAIf6fOqDCwNzYsf-Y/
819444
1445477
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/dTYzr4LC6NfRXT2PAQ6JOPL0_ws/
819443
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/PnvZYB98SRHU5lo7YlmrQt9OETk/
819442
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Manger, James H
2012-12-20
jose
/arch/msg/jose/uDvlDFLkyDDOzj9A-YVGVFtbhJ4/
819441
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ZNnjnAYTZRJctYkhv9sdpXUEKBI/
819440
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
John Bradley
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/BVsiZPIY9jgYh2iDQSnQXmQDiaM/
819439
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Manger, James H
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/xRvKdhHF53uGFt5mVn7_4Unciko/
819438
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/CZ7kdSzqSK0bJi9ciSmdWrv6frU/
819437
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
John Bradley
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/88CxR_tXqRD99itSevbeB9mEmj8/
819436
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/7gzExjq94srVvEmMzHeerwd5Vwg/
819435
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/bn42uZOofXi2hNH_zZdI-9-8-vc/
819434
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Richard Barnes
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/EDmXkW7awhjeYO_qVc1uiwLMNCw/
819433
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/-PdgnwUGLRT7EIP6LlNCcE8qMfY/
819432
1445476
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/KlhiWNas4rauO1s6iaXuY2xIFpQ/
819431
1445477
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/-wTG0iMyls4fOc45eTegIElU0oA/
819430
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ThnpuNTou11tkYUwlFH0LFjUK8I/
819429
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/a1gtQE2ZUAiZ5SYwnfdzREyJHiw/
819428
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Richard Barnes
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/EMMF_FOl6MlZY-GfvmmxqXmc3ao/
819427
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/NFyJOzJAINKdsW8k6-tac-08b8k/
819426
1445476
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/-vw0H75nAI52tGfPr18IxDLIjkM/
819425
1445477
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/p5cObAjWpN3DRB0j5qeZ7nWhz7k/
819424
1445476
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Manger, James H
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/USBei8GAD9DPt_ZQlsmzvfhkxKU/
819423
1445477
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Anthony Nadalin
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/cmvOtNbQX8-UGTGezk9s3wpNbfU/
819422
1445476
Re: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloadsRe: [jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Dick Hardt
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/vmHXjzSvmMHhuV2icZIWrkURerc/
819421
1445476
[jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads[jose] Reducing the size of JWS payloads
Mike Jones
2012-12-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/1GAn22MHwz-6Jxt5ClYK2SgcxOc/
819420
1445476
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/iDZ50Ucn5tnPRDJex6TJzog4bLY/
819419
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Manger, James H
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/l6EiIyf4cqeuHqy1rxCZqDAddRA/
819418
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Richard Barnes
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/5BwN8IcpSv0ZOdcETblNLH5-Qwc/
819417
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/QmwCy7gDn09etY_RZ42nrQa9iPw/
819416
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/N45BIB2FFS30eQay71aHHh0ib_4/
819415
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Manger, James H
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ZYkd66DGC97rw9_h84iRGGk9gCc/
819414
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Axel.Nennker
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/jCRwhIt57ixGVK-FVxJslTw2knI/
819413
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/5q6PfwWVqgjK5ll3Br8_PFRvjuE/
819412
1445477
Re: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fieldsRe: [jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/dEcgQQrAeiVvCuO6_2y9ylJQONs/
819411
1445477
[jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields[jose] Whether implementations must understand all JOSE header fields
Mike Jones
2012-12-14
jose
/arch/msg/jose/xhXNKvGJcHmSqOLYjLZ4MLR9Jcw/
819410
1445477
Re: [jose] NamespaceRe: [jose] Namespace
Mike Jones
2012-12-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/0ZisgOtWZKbnn8VBNh9m0TWeyhU/
819409
1445479
Re: [jose] Extensibility (was "Criticality")Re: [jose] Extensibility (was "Criticality")
Mike Jones
2012-12-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/7pKeYoQXu3YJ4fIb5HecBWMD6Qs/
819408
1445480
Re: [jose] order of step for encryption. JWE section 5Re: [jose] order of step for encryption. JWE section 5
Mike Jones
2012-12-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/KpTD3vBqUxU3xUQzm5j23WVskr0/
819407
1445559
40 Messages