Subject
From
Date
List
[Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-04[Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-04
Matt Miller (mamille2)
2013-09-26
json
/arch/msg/json/-0PdQc8aqVv9A80vocSuXSFu39c/
823728
1446018
Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-04Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-04
R S
2013-09-26
json
/arch/msg/json/uSZsA_tThFeGGgjH7AR5yY7Tdgg/
823729
1446018
[Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification[Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-09-26
json
/arch/msg/json/Jsap0fY-NNlWYH7ZEO_kAU2GOZA/
823734
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-09-26
json
/arch/msg/json/_dHS6AGWUwh6vlhhv_06RZbjj44/
823738
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Eliot Lear
2013-09-26
json
/arch/msg/json/iVNSuNpr3nrxoSX5yQUxIXwQYTI/
823741
1446018
[Json] ECMA-262 normative?[Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Carsten Bormann
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/_zY_WMi0dESq1pVp02wh-GMiZT8/
823807
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
John Cowan
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/6w09rNzFZ42sL2CMUaWn6MKRbUY/
823808
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Paul Hoffman
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/NQlOdmqlaUOBwDsTdlahVt-yJRU/
823809
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Tim Bray
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/-E7gObb-3Nwjb-Yb7WLGX6DlCLw/
823810
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Eliot Lear
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/0-GezEVYsn02itCSGtagawtm8Rs/
823811
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
R S
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/7l1Jj70v6HkgVDuqDNf9_oZCsRc/
823813
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/8GFl0EUVzRo1A34sFarlEOQ-BdY/
823818
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/Xh6nQcjgEAnHnB0yLet1LjSJ33M/
823819
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-09-26
json
/arch/msg/json/CkmQFZ2D2pVLepIASMdGt6USuaQ/
823748
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/LNRBHDv719MWXnMgIzajzNMiZ8o/
823752
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/09GvJ0IQXy3WDNTyOYTvIUg6EdI/
823756
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/m0LsjexqHnBKo8_fhMrV2DPXAgA/
823758
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/Gn78h4NdYxNn8ks0vKJACad6Hh0/
823759
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/Bc-BGClobZNm1GwTsRfeSyJTueg/
823775
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/xtGsNOPxwhAs91G_6Amcg-kNdwY/
823776
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Carsten Bormann
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/gnJpUqF1S-y6_nJ7Tso5ITVJPBQ/
823777
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/HLER6s5s3p1NqDI-tUyh--dgQ_I/
823806
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/qymwBXqmvMbYnr2MhHg2p0Mgdf4/
823816
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/vI9VQb0RnzKQ9y5VLzQVq29Q1n4/
823817
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
John Cowan
2013-09-27
json
/arch/msg/json/NH7YE3QWYgC_8WYZsyiZvlK3AwE/
823760
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/FUos4sNi4BgcvzA3fVsH-qY7jE8/
823820
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/4Jet4inSg1MtIRDnT5lW5gSTSEA/
823821
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/tpxXsPaptKXXjMeo-I7XsOGaBYM/
823826
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/GBOvM38W6zgdQz0RzWIqqg65X8Q/
823827
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/SjshzKoMHMqc3m6iUtjVtmSCgVU/
823830
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/BjmRzti9kty-Zf2TFp_nmhOWi80/
823832
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/IrunoP6vUEPDtL1b6ZvsUmufVpU/
823834
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
John Cowan
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/R48MhOlbWCn1_jMtXGYzsDavhb0/
823836
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/gvs6KyFE-loPOZ_nquo2x_3VBbk/
823839
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/XTaHDrWn8boPouotBtPe60LIysg/
823844
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Manger, James H
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/zVcP2Dso1_DXnKBaa8-JuJh0pA4/
823847
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
John Cowan
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/VuC3cUj8ZFQdCsJQbaQBqZ3N8mQ/
823850
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Manger, James H
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/AjIrRWXrbA2kB78eUjbC7hiSlRw/
823851
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Jorge Chamorro
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/PI-srw4jaIgDwRxdw4jWHLa-JhY/
823833
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/yCErrgcj5eRQGA2wrmvSS_VUNjg/
823835
1446018
115 Messages