Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]
Stefan Drees
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/LE_0Exe95jj0I_3D4tSp2VzDPDE/
823855
1446016
Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]
Peter Patel-Schneider
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/nC4d7Knbzc9vvucvi89YAZ_88PE/
823854
1446016
Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]Re: [Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]
Tim Bray
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/QUObxzH65zOmiWTW_YLYrpVWNb8/
823853
1446016
[Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED][Json] What is a JSON-text? [REVISITED]
Matt Miller (mamille2)
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/eylrxTBzKhBQkrqQUm7heNXAaJE/
823852
1446016
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Manger, James H
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/AjIrRWXrbA2kB78eUjbC7hiSlRw/
823851
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
John Cowan
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/VuC3cUj8ZFQdCsJQbaQBqZ3N8mQ/
823850
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Martin J. Dürst
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/299eRwoApSb7JMHNF3LLno_gNWo/
823849
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/isr_mHwXUHG6n1BSsr2Ztc7JRP8/
823848
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Manger, James H
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/zVcP2Dso1_DXnKBaa8-JuJh0pA4/
823847
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Martin J. Dürst
2013-10-03
json
/arch/msg/json/b_ahHX54B6zxZJth6_AwjKYJE48/
823846
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/DphptJ8b_tGkN51upO7XsYYGNFQ/
823845
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/XTaHDrWn8boPouotBtPe60LIysg/
823844
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Jorge Chamorro
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/5DEdDqprLk2TvceNw5KiKnBilec/
823843
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Jorge Chamorro
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/Wscg9Fr1kHj7aN2vxX6tikTmJ2c/
823842
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
John Cowan
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/Ii9eslK3u6yhV3TJvt_XT-2el0c/
823841
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/1r9_i9rn3HXocMGUvAoeugDQcM8/
823840
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/gvs6KyFE-loPOZ_nquo2x_3VBbk/
823839
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/ZFeXPhPz4U9RWv-99UmnpD1zryo/
823838
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
John Cowan
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/62UZXzwOurxIU7uh6q1jzvHCAUE/
823837
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
John Cowan
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/R48MhOlbWCn1_jMtXGYzsDavhb0/
823836
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/yCErrgcj5eRQGA2wrmvSS_VUNjg/
823835
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/IrunoP6vUEPDtL1b6ZvsUmufVpU/
823834
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Jorge Chamorro
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/PI-srw4jaIgDwRxdw4jWHLa-JhY/
823833
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/BjmRzti9kty-Zf2TFp_nmhOWi80/
823832
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/nR6cIdyEM4qdDGQ-QejKMfym4Cg/
823831
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/SjshzKoMHMqc3m6iUtjVtmSCgVU/
823830
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/E7J5EAbgQ_uqaEO2Dt-yNCjmuc8/
823829
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/3qz9NY2w0kxzWTZAiG4oD1u2hv8/
823828
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/GBOvM38W6zgdQz0RzWIqqg65X8Q/
823827
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/tpxXsPaptKXXjMeo-I7XsOGaBYM/
823826
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/t2ypvp7zLii6DhBQ-xff1cf6Wvg/
823825
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/_X1FMAq95DXjebcTgQfHBjsjTNY/
823824
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/XuEL6wIH3M8otj-t9ye9415ZALs/
823823
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Bjoern Hoehrmann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/Pc079utkCY2N8ovEn777LO52sCI/
823822
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/4Jet4inSg1MtIRDnT5lW5gSTSEA/
823821
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/FUos4sNi4BgcvzA3fVsH-qY7jE8/
823820
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/Xh6nQcjgEAnHnB0yLet1LjSJ33M/
823819
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/8GFl0EUVzRo1A34sFarlEOQ-BdY/
823818
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/vI9VQb0RnzKQ9y5VLzQVq29Q1n4/
823817
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/qymwBXqmvMbYnr2MhHg2p0Mgdf4/
823816
1446018