Subject
From
Date
List
[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
Richard Clayton
2011-10-17
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/svpjb-coe4HCrsZE03ywcAS4JAU/
1007535
1505698
Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
Måns Nilsson
2011-10-17
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/pk-W93N4jHTy8H7iJyRJ0wOXg_s/
1007536
1505698
Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012Re: [dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
John Levine
2011-10-17
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/gtonLab6bLum1fPXrMednT08Loo/
1007537
1505698
[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2012
Richard Clayton
2012-01-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/wovS3FOSEw3Fu0xHc5TnZKJSKzg/
1007824
1505698
[dnsext] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-01.txt[dnsext] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-01.txt
Edward Lewis
2011-10-14
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Ow59UtAwUNYQ93GkQ7gdjSJjikM/
1007530
1505699
[dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reports[dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reports
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-11
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/I-lMqhFXHgEz0Lat4hsXxfUCrW4/
1007525
1505700
Re: [dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reportsRe: [dnsext] ICANN Variant Issues Project case study reports
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-11
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/rX6oSciZPKoafEbZ4Q_f5nIzCqM/
1007526
1505700
[dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit[dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-06
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/CDu_1vRX0h18Cz9Gnl89eFbdst8/
1007502
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/VXmD_XdZ1KKVf38DF-FH8JT9lCY/
1007503
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/qE_lVeLb5RRhEl0_7hxGPFf5riY/
1007504
1505701
[dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit[dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/R18kiZMF5cBdSDQ7UTwz-keMaus/
1007506
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/jEBEPELRhDbVdGaGkLwKoMeBVMo/
1007507
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/LxUmw51yF08W02KmpAQRfhqHAyA/
1007508
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
David Conrad
2011-10-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/KsTL4KAfcCukgeVWxbM2mRNVOXM/
1007510
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/1TcjOESYnon-Eb-SxUG17Cdse9c/
1007511
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/SrGo0f1AUyTPqsh_gOCztYuMtyI/
1007513
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/kXpQMjOgzyjSsO4Y-mkFAGRjSgI/
1007514
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/mAFVyn-iDQWWu6w9sG0KEBvpngg/
1007515
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/w4lUmveY19OslYhQ41HcehP50VU/
1007516
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/HfDWH8CKlR9CnsQF8mRZ_KvNCHg/
1007517
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/7xNvUyjDiePuULFvIESagbP3DCw/
1007518
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/DvGxYsD9cDCf0Tm6dmVs52mVaTE/
1007520
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/M15UhUuEBL9tb2yTqsM8ogoAC5I/
1007522
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-11
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/MonEMGi1zOTIs2HRh8WRJzvwAzw/
1007523
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-11
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/-wQMLsVeOXVjF2VvdZK570dYNxI/
1007524
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2011-10-17
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/AcRVFCOQYL5SwUFnFb5vZjmXB3o/
1007531
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-17
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/2mZuD9ZcWcity03KVUrxzz-Xu48/
1007532
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-17
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/gG32NeSrJuDQaP7jFy9sZZvbn-s/
1007533
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/YsGVLyeRfHRvRaEAD2ZWqXWrl9I/
1007539
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/FcxXjIHOUeRrEeduM1FfjIhXkJc/
1007540
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/UqCQhyDezhetxx8U5R1NVKNXZCw/
1007541
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/jM4pd5CBo_J8qvSfAySSymPgkak/
1007542
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mark Andrews
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/hAlH0slw8WANBMSdrddB-S9nQms/
1007543
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD BitRe: [dnsext] Why are we re-opening this topic? Was: Suggested update to RFC 4035 section 4.9.2 Handling of the CD Bit
Mohan Parthasarathy
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/xPXHMI6j6f_vmqGx4aNbw1gicwE/
1007544
1505701
[dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)[dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Andrew Sullivan
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/i0jbSCvKt7AwrK5KuZ1d5Boa94M/
1007546
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Brian Dickson
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/2dU-iNH1l_jICh6Y4NINwEQ_RYU/
1007547
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Edward Lewis
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Hc29BKdGDTRFBkO8UqMNFsXP7DA/
1007553
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Michael StJohns
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/TkMEKgzGkPf5k4PbzOzfIZY9rNc/
1007556
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Nicholas Weaver
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/XWmbTbX20QWBbxn80N1Pjprdg9E/
1007557
1505701
Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)Re: [dnsext] Other views request from chair (was : Why are we re-opening. . .)
Michael StJohns
2011-10-18
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/1A1JY-M8666PmA-T5VNOfDPHHx4/
1007558
1505701