Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/7rTX6GizdPLixr3uzyou-5Z26gk/
1007963
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Blacka, David
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/q3uB9xOQUb5_I4dSPxDShakTGTw/
1007962
1505649
[dnsext] Ghost domain names[dnsext] Ghost domain names
Edward Lewis
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/0mlKeBJRtlsU-Z_G7SHN0d0ci28/
1007961
1505649
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
Edward Lewis
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/SxcpWDt5ctsz5zBYBsleCyNL5v4/
1007960
1505652
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/CcmHKVSIsSbmNYBJPqAme2r09Mw/
1007959
1505649
[dnsext] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender[dnsext] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Joao Damas
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/iyd7aKbJ63jb29tyqPvB_cKM1m0/
1007958
1505648
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
Florian Weimer
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/ae2VnNbqM3NEYVbXo3lfEguyoik/
1007957
1505652
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-13
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/FuyUQDYR3SyP3PLCKOM2182xNLQ/
1007956
1505652
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Blacka, David
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/soQal3nbLhP0bHl6sut-Ei31QRc/
1007955
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/R5ywgZua-8v5PiGBwt-RsEdQqcY/
1007954
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Evan Hunt
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Y6x6vuO1KVQJRVCaKbZE5R6Ju7Q/
1007953
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Paul Hoffman
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/MYhBKcylO1TIHMO3W_ia2DTTn2U/
1007952
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Nicholas Weaver
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Amt3cdX2igesez-FEIvSbtC0dSk/
1007951
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/FgqpP3OkrXh9-CNk2rboLTgAmPc/
1007950
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Florian Weimer
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/VQLUE75Gy8hBtbsmCYHhmAelNO8/
1007949
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/VWUQ5ns6i1RzuUOk8bTlEV3joTI/
1007948
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
paul vixie
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Z_lr1gDXL5d6LkT5ALs42JJ8OYI/
1007947
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Stephane Bortzmeyer
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/l1NOVeydVgb2SomoW71r3auKsbk/
1007946
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Warren Kumari
2012-02-10
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/HXnU1yeLvsBkTxpk-gzzn713Bfc/
1007945
1505649
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/RFLz9ZiNgjjRdrLITSDZTNJRD7U/
1007944
1505652
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/OgFet0Y5mNB8UFmpGSe2QSHTV_w/
1007943
1505649
Re: [dnsext] algo-sig shepherd was Re: WG state reminderRe: [dnsext] algo-sig shepherd was Re: WG state reminder
Joe Abley
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/b_8JZhY7uFhTJsqUxv3rCP8vG20/
1007942
1505657
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/jkLowh9ezSn4P9f80OeR0T-kFdE/
1007941
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Frederico A C Neves
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/aALeLWkhrVPMsdGxecDuulPwYbc/
1007940
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/MBv9FmfvKFohk63jGANcn_kKyGA/
1007939
1505649
[dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"[dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
paul vixie
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/hE4dQsgyt7UgxciLZfW9pOThaw8/
1007938
1505649
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/I3DQ_ts-MwjcOmMtu1Bfpg_Jrw4/
1007937
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/tQFpZlKbzxAsYPSndJjDMSgjF9k/
1007936
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mark Andrews
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/55acT0ihpNZfTB8N1Jmqm107VAg/
1007935
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Edward Lewis
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/ucaaqbwMsG_-zQEAKzWvG4_0xgc/
1007934
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/-d-lQbBqUxPTBd1ED-lHFF9Djjg/
1007933
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mark Andrews
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/JQlWTyZJpW3smkqCV1mR7kTjQGs/
1007932
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Paul Hoffman
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/1zDwgFm7vXsrGwHd6GkWvbZLGzQ/
1007931
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/NaSufJQOrR-Of1_h9UMhmNqiIsM/
1007930
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/xo4u489GiIXvx8OxHHJbeo8KAVA/
1007929
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Eric Brunner-Williams
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/2uS6AZP_KfwricIbabwU9V6_JEY/
1007928
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
bmanning
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Klj0ckxo7Wzw_Q_i8h8RK5Tdk7Y/
1007927
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/nzH8s6REciCdc-ukL2Q3URfuvIc/
1007926
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mark Andrews
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/glq4cOLesXil2YlZw9xnEihAPU0/
1007925
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/vT8aSjzEY772MzAGmr0xFPEDhsI/
1007924
1505651