Re: [dnsext] algo-sig shepherd was Re: WG state reminderRe: [dnsext] algo-sig shepherd was Re: WG state reminder
Joe Abley
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/b_8JZhY7uFhTJsqUxv3rCP8vG20/
1007942
1505657
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/jkLowh9ezSn4P9f80OeR0T-kFdE/
1007941
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Frederico A C Neves
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/aALeLWkhrVPMsdGxecDuulPwYbc/
1007940
1505649
Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/MBv9FmfvKFohk63jGANcn_kKyGA/
1007939
1505649
[dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"[dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
paul vixie
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/hE4dQsgyt7UgxciLZfW9pOThaw8/
1007938
1505649
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/I3DQ_ts-MwjcOmMtu1Bfpg_Jrw4/
1007937
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/tQFpZlKbzxAsYPSndJjDMSgjF9k/
1007936
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mark Andrews
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/55acT0ihpNZfTB8N1Jmqm107VAg/
1007935
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Edward Lewis
2012-02-09
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/ucaaqbwMsG_-zQEAKzWvG4_0xgc/
1007934
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/-d-lQbBqUxPTBd1ED-lHFF9Djjg/
1007933
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mark Andrews
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/JQlWTyZJpW3smkqCV1mR7kTjQGs/
1007932
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Paul Hoffman
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/1zDwgFm7vXsrGwHd6GkWvbZLGzQ/
1007931
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/NaSufJQOrR-Of1_h9UMhmNqiIsM/
1007930
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/xo4u489GiIXvx8OxHHJbeo8KAVA/
1007929
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Eric Brunner-Williams
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/2uS6AZP_KfwricIbabwU9V6_JEY/
1007928
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
bmanning
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Klj0ckxo7Wzw_Q_i8h8RK5Tdk7Y/
1007927
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/nzH8s6REciCdc-ukL2Q3URfuvIc/
1007926
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mark Andrews
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/glq4cOLesXil2YlZw9xnEihAPU0/
1007925
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/vT8aSjzEY772MzAGmr0xFPEDhsI/
1007924
1505651
[dnsext] some words[dnsext] some words
Mark Andrews
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Ko0v6Cy_HQjc4PV9EAZdGJnfRLQ/
1007923
1505650
Re: [dnsext] What is indeterminateRe: [dnsext] What is indeterminate
Paul Hoffman
2012-02-08
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/01LH7TlbPkV1n1mVeo5DPir7yOE/
1007922
1505651
Re: [dnsext] What is indeterminateRe: [dnsext] What is indeterminate
Mark Andrews
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/7zhMdLPlZnRb91EqPaqdCksnsMk/
1007921
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mark Andrews
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/v9_QC8ptzF-UtYrUWwar9QW2Cb4/
1007920
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/bt7RCyOVoPv1J5lciz1VBGECj3M/
1007919
1505651
[dnsext] What is indeterminate[dnsext] What is indeterminate
Paul Hoffman
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/o33bd9rs9DHl_iK_riRWdOxj6Y8/
1007918
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Edward Lewis
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/cMvA10Rv-HolR9syU9Obk0wuIyU/
1007917
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/F-Jffp-0hbOcqyZyFHY5lEh2IDQ/
1007916
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/k5fM_Rpmh2GlAgl_6gMincvQbuc/
1007915
1505651
Re: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updatesRe: [dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/qHKm6MVW-9vx-EHswJYSH-kNjLw/
1007914
1505651
[dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates[dnsext] Issues in WGLC of dnssec-bis-updates
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Meyg589yHj_9_xpNUZhyZP8XuaA/
1007913
1505651
[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
internet-drafts
2012-02-07
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/uKARePgG0DIV9Q8Yb2sjGPkkfd8/
1007912
1505652
Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific wordingRe: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific wording
Mohan Parthasarathy
2012-02-03
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/ngOnkoPDat0O1dhsdzPHngJy8E8/
1007911
1505692
Re: [dnsext] WG state reminderRe: [dnsext] WG state reminder
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-02
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/BVupxCbV1TJCS0k0AMBbfbg66yw/
1007910
1505657
Re: [dnsext] CNAME check Re: [WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16]Re: [dnsext] CNAME check Re: [WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16]
Yao Jiankang
2012-02-02
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/4F1LtnG0w6RtjCxKahlB8sHZQ8Q/
1007909
1505653
Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16
Paul Hoffman
2012-02-01
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/MMyb5lFVdkAnFFSV5OIaQrhIkx4/
1007908
1505664
Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16
Matthijs Mekking
2012-02-01
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/wOPbuICnNVoLijou23LWEuMbs-o/
1007907
1505664
Re: [dnsext] CNAME check Re: [WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16]Re: [dnsext] CNAME check Re: [WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16]
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-01
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/P8Ry3dP5Ba9xqiSth-7FkTRU3tY/
1007906
1505653
Re: [dnsext] CNAME check Re: [WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16]Re: [dnsext] CNAME check Re: [WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16]
Andrew Sullivan
2012-02-01
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/5MX4sJMtKg9LCVKRNrRMDc-z1fo/
1007905
1505653
Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16
Samuel Weiler
2012-02-01
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/7yeonVQU-BqKWJGjvMKduMz47iI/
1007904
1505664
Re: [dnsext] draft-srose-dnssec-algo-imp-status-00 (was: Re: Follow up on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes)Re: [dnsext] draft-srose-dnssec-algo-imp-status-00 (was: Re: Follow up on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes)
Samuel Weiler
2012-02-01
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/_rUz2bIETRFbpSVxgFNCYCaMSRc/
1007903
1505675