Subject
From
Date
List
IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported"IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported"
Carl Kugler
1998-06-08
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/hmwJZPcT_aNxzkegPHhWtxKt56s/
1956256
1561959
Re: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported"Re: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported"
Robert Herriot
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/xTA9gt_miZE8y0lqpgc6ZCjacik/
1956263
1561959
Re: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported"Re: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported"
Carl Kugler
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/3szxjg2lj3n7rnGAW_GSAzDKOqE/
1956271
1561959
Re: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported" [MOD needs clarification]Re: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported" [MOD needs clarification]
Tom Hastings
1998-06-10
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/m7cvyjf-BOl3nq41EdhNdXN2l8o/
1956302
1561959
Re: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported" [MOD neRe: IPP> MOD> "document-format-supported" [MOD ne
Carl Kugler
1998-06-10
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/8yC__UQUlRMTP20VXIJMIWU3_ZE/
1956305
1561959
Re: IPP> MOD> Printer attributes specialized by "document-format"Re: IPP> MOD> Printer attributes specialized by "document-format"
Carl Kugler
1998-07-17
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/yBWrI7fq5BhMeioeBqOcATeSEJo/
1956595
1561959
IPP> ADM - Keith Moore will join telecon, Wed, 6/10, 10-12 PDT (1-3 EDT)IPP> ADM - Keith Moore will join telecon, Wed, 6/10, 10-12 PDT (1-3 EDT)
Tom Hastings
1998-06-08
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/6xzHTXy818Abn5pHxcC_N8H_wcY/
1956251
1561960
IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcIPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Roger K Debry
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/rn-dZLDb2VXZLm5npgVwJuVOFlo/
1956229
1561961
Re: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRe: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
James Walker
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/bR7B0NozLhYBQydkNVkSKLuJ8Ys/
1956231
1561961
RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Josh Cohen
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/le0ZWliSHGfgsBWlnvW7_WgJqQk/
1956233
1561961
Re: RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRe: RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Carl Kugler
1998-06-06
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/YzdhdoWURsTqUGlQHNDRub_No-I/
1956236
1561961
RE: RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRE: RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Josh Cohen
1998-06-06
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/6AOFpJPz_CoC7QFNZ14cz1J4QNc/
1956238
1561961
RE: RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRE: RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Larry Masinter
1998-06-06
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/pHXVzXQTsRjLCRSloGAbKx3-VIY/
1956242
1561961
Re: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRe: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Roger K Debry
1998-06-08
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/ktBhJ14SAZIXV_Zg_Eulum27-cE/
1956244
1561961
RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Roger K Debry
1998-06-08
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/SoDjKhG6uW-eb-FCamo98n_FHRs/
1956243
1561961
RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Zehler, Peter
1998-06-08
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/sX1q_SD209MkLwD19GmJ9Z3sYmA/
1956245
1561961
RE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etcRE: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc
Josh Cohen
1998-06-08
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/v6-CECo7DgUGI_zRmWi9YbdlvLw/
1956252
1561961
PMP> Can an RFC 1759 implementation use the alert(18) type 1 code?PMP> Can an RFC 1759 implementation use the alert(18) type 1 code?
Tom Hastings
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/prZEiAjD6aJuaYqES_sQ2qPhids/
1956220
1561962
Re: PMP> Can an RFC 1759 implementation use the alert(18) type 1 code?Re: PMP> Can an RFC 1759 implementation use the alert(18) type 1 code?
Ron Bergman
1998-06-08
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/oGyrrQbyeY4UCMJUgtjw4J44TW0/
1956246
1561962
IPP> MOD - A couple of POSITIVE things about an "ipp" schemeIPP> MOD - A couple of POSITIVE things about an "ipp" scheme
Carl-Uno Manros
1998-06-04
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/ekVyuhLofxfCDQKuh76DW5mH99w/
1956207
1561963
RE: IPP> MOD - A couple of POSITIVE things about an "ipp" schemeRE: IPP> MOD - A couple of POSITIVE things about an "ipp" scheme
Josh Cohen
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/2m-w969PDc6K-8cZNsLKgPVZQaI/
1956219
1561963
IPP> ADM - Now we know what is holding up TLSIPP> ADM - Now we know what is holding up TLS
Carl-Uno Manros
1998-06-04
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/d7dX0YUYWcW8Y0fMEBT57s6p0xA/
1956202
1561964
IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Jay Martin
1998-06-04
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/AGlLxF-Tsjj_fIAiKLnGqVf1LOQ/
1956200
1561965
RE: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?RE: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Paul Moore
1998-06-04
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/9GWgQtkxkyRQ0r_pUI3XUAqTd5Y/
1956201
1561965
Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Harry Lewis
1998-06-04
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/TXx2TgUUn9R3sQeL4UGd7DEXi5Q/
1956206
1561965
Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Carl-Uno Manros
1998-06-04
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/Chkx8OJ-1vkpeh4UjwzWLy5nhBQ/
1956211
1561965
Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Jay Martin
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/7y_P3nIw-SbiAgJNPJvD1gY_tqQ/
1956215
1561965
Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Carl-Uno Manros
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/T9Ij_q8GV_DPHYEcBze_PhhzkF8/
1956217
1561965
RE: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?RE: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Josh Cohen
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/v7gLwRpgJmk030PVkHCzQABPcYI/
1956221
1561965
Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?
Jay Martin
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/bpxoafwGvOzmq5Xk-PNPIQOyTxM/
1956225
1561965
RE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Harry Lewis
1998-06-04
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/E1kbA4QQzOIkbnR44sOwniP-5aQ/
1956196
1561956
Re: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRe: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Keith Moore
1998-06-05
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/O6lcXPtNCtwVjvlxLj8L2V2ezTk/
1956227
1561956
Re: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRe: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Carl-Uno Manros
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/4cC6p4beUkkzMGgtDIV_qydVT94/
1956259
1561956
Re: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRe: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Keith Moore
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/QbvbzK9QHRgGsUytvrQbgh5KhVg/
1956262
1561956
RE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Josh Cohen
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/-OL6HYKVwM-Al4hcnMbyMDPtW8A/
1956264
1561956
Re: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRe: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Keith Moore
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/zIXeLQlqTaWlHFti26WoegeD8mU/
1956265
1561956
Re: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRe: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Carl-Uno Manros
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/xLIkyfZNEwKb-BHigkFQ8PuBcZ0/
1956267
1561956
Re: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRe: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Keith Moore
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/WZFfMwXwUgu9kiRotccPcGIXcZk/
1956269
1561956
RE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Josh Cohen
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/KOSJA4w0_fCfhQA8McHOkErMRTs/
1956266
1561956
Re: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and portRe: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port
Keith Moore
1998-06-09
pwg
/arch/msg/pwg/sPQJFxl45uBMKqaORbhz-YP64T8/
1956268
1561956