[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
ianswett
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-jHJsdMb6flNS7m5jeFxBrjPOh8/
2834883
1878061
[quicwg/base-drafts] 881369: Redefine recovery period[quicwg/base-drafts] 881369: Redefine recovery period
ianswett
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G3S18qjNS4ya3uj-XndWaZJx9vY/
2834882
1878060
[quicwg/base-drafts] 884a94: Script updating issues at 2020-02-11T23:42:52Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] 884a94: Script updating issues at 2020-02-11T23:42:52Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ORvz-H2Gvj3vArQ-BPoFlppHwRc/
2834881
1878059
[quicwg/base-drafts] 54b330: Script updating gh-pages from 99baf78d. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 54b330: Script updating gh-pages from 99baf78d. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OLmfLWqHWoU8VECzMoWZ5NfOH70/
2834878
1878058
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EHI4tgglVujVtY-lwfX685Z6RsA/
2834875
1878057
[quicwg/base-drafts] ce9a03: Extension dragons[quicwg/base-drafts] ce9a03: Extension dragons
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uYSEvIQLZa6YiHVWtHqnwY8ZvFk/
2834874
1878056
[quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)[quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mby0VkrnVXqVCjmSxE5fJ3wasp4/
2834867
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yHuTghIA2h0FKt1IdA5q4twk3aw/
2834959
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/47wlV-C86a-wBpGHFR3ETjyXuXU/
2834985
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FeEmJ-LUoPsF4ZMLsIHH6Ss7fig/
2834986
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Sp3SsRtHnoZCBLomZVA3ydYMzl0/
2834993
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jexozQNBCdEbfQ-PQW8bsgC41xY/
2834999
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aTW2iJ02QBKgSjsQYEm4caZ_Ruw/
2835008
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9T0lIQ7WazzmELr3xbK4FRfmH0s/
2835012
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yqIagh09VscEfyt2QKZEDONOBOM/
2835082
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Hu8gR2OWtgrqDZtZ86wamrku01k/
2835135
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
mirjak
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nmb1snY7YQrxTFZfvA0-vjxiyW4/
2835144
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hqoe7z_X9w2JGKQyavayn_VY-gg/
2835145
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/21yXX4N2Qvyrx7p42lj4NuRcJHk/
2835244
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pJS1fl2mWVEAfNB6UdJsUE7PpGE/
2835311
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JoTHtjSUI05DnXKZmgVDBsWUa3c/
2835349
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Igor Lubashev
2020-02-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/v0Ixg0MENGZMUOeMIfsDK61KwxA/
2836313
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
MikkelFJ
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/TsuXctB99gUHRayxdHK6-tgJ2J0/
2838439
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wLB8oBNW0LY4-uPk9ek4FNEfc0M/
2838464
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Igor Lubashev
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/emfQ0exsrTi4vZJ3FNU4lEvQtRo/
2838614
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-24
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0qJ7Y4h70LMptRn60ErQgRoVqQU/
2839251
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Igor Lubashev
2020-03-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FHH_spnqCj6KLuMptIaYDfotaWw/
2842885
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-03-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rrS27GeulYpqGKv2lPyLQyo0fvs/
2842905
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-03-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7Avxa5Qk23oOlnzgcaYHJhwEshM/
2845211
1878053
[quicwg/base-drafts] 5cfa36: Script updating gh-pages from ab8059ef. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 5cfa36: Script updating gh-pages from ab8059ef. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Wnr4uENOz0mYAAawkHRWRpM9VQM/
2834866
1878052
[quicwg/base-drafts] ab8059: Tweak traffic analysis text (#3411)[quicwg/base-drafts] ab8059: Tweak traffic analysis text (#3411)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/B5GhGYmHQF854H0pXgRAEvKG4H4/
2834862
1878051
[quicwg/base-drafts] 8950c9: Script updating gh-pages from c1a16dd5. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 8950c9: Script updating gh-pages from c1a16dd5. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/btgj-K4Yw9-QlzLW_IC8Dv2R9HM/
2834860
1878050
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0e97c8: Import most H2 references[quicwg/base-drafts] 0e97c8: Import most H2 references
Mike Bishop
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WHi9mhh3mGTEHzdlY-sSWLwY_r8/
2834858
1878049
[quicwg/base-drafts] 6e377c: Script updating gh-pages from 367f668e. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 6e377c: Script updating gh-pages from 367f668e. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Zeo_D9DaU4ywjU8woAYc18ZcH9Q/
2834769
1878020
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Mike Bishop
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0Oj5ZuQTaADbcNfuqtiqaiPAJrI/
2834766
1878019
[quicwg/base-drafts] 8c9611: Script updating gh-pages from 7a7304be. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 8c9611: Script updating gh-pages from 7a7304be. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6MskfhGC-G1h_FYoeiCWpyR3Gb8/
2834764
1878017
[quicwg/base-drafts] 7a7304: Reconcile with #3309[quicwg/base-drafts] 7a7304: Reconcile with #3309
Mike Bishop
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ckeFUieK0uMPvY3ioQDUXwVQTLg/
2834762
1878016
[quicwg/base-drafts] 49ae2d: Script updating gh-pages from 5d0f2bed. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 49ae2d: Script updating gh-pages from 5d0f2bed. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zIjPSb4i4wSMQHfedM6GUFjADxk/
2834761
1878015
[quicwg/base-drafts] a9e527: Import more RFC7540 header text[quicwg/base-drafts] a9e527: Import more RFC7540 header text
Mike Bishop
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iP6t9mCpUtTopTC-b68fjejBrIc/
2834759
1878014
[quicwg/base-drafts] 681519: Script updating gh-pages from 55dd0c28. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 681519: Script updating gh-pages from 55dd0c28. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MLSR3-lfl6RnCmLslhi17CvFD9o/
2834754
1878013
40 Messages