[quicwg/base-drafts] 6f9f8d: Curtail CONNECTION_CLOSE for small Initial[quicwg/base-drafts] 6f9f8d: Curtail CONNECTION_CLOSE for small Initial
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0HSpIH4uUMr2zkRNSVHPq-YNdw0/
2834919
1878074
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EHaTRUeMkiJ0ijOgfhlj0WTOmyk/
2834918
1878073
[quicwg/base-drafts] b3c9a8: Script updating gh-pages from 5020e34e. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] b3c9a8: Script updating gh-pages from 5020e34e. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ueZaKApKMgh2CLdv5i23Z9MZ9YI/
2834914
1878071
[quicwg/base-drafts] d2eae3: MinRTT for the congestion control context[quicwg/base-drafts] d2eae3: MinRTT for the congestion control context
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YMGTLKvfHuqGe5WSxnTEfwXQAD8/
2834912
1878070
[quicwg/base-drafts] 01b998: Script updating gh-pages from 922bd62a. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 01b998: Script updating gh-pages from 922bd62a. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zUloQChgRbFwIGEHh_0MpzucpWk/
2834911
1878069
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gfaHuoqYib3r2W6xfNJe4YbRkoE/
2834909
1878068
[quicwg/base-drafts] 947548: add note on pacing and editorialze[quicwg/base-drafts] 947548: add note on pacing and editorialze
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DTMaqA8T9Uv0ctidz8SWWV-Ee1k/
2834908
1878067
[quicwg/base-drafts] 8637d6: Script updating gh-pages from d1059088. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 8637d6: Script updating gh-pages from d1059088. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tlSuqKRIWx61WHd_k5Bs7M9Q9Vs/
2834898
1878066
[quicwg/base-drafts] c28516: Script updating gh-pages from 9f7a4a6d. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] c28516: Script updating gh-pages from 9f7a4a6d. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Oa83t3BGgMjfPs9Ip42IKmlCkG8/
2834894
1878065
[quicwg/base-drafts] 059773: Clarify that you can use any issued CID at any tim...[quicwg/base-drafts] 059773: Clarify that you can use any issued CID at any tim...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EgoIWnC1mFM6vSuv42BwKIgIg7s/
2834892
1878064
[quicwg/base-drafts] d0d15f: Fix #3405: Specify that active_connection_id_limit...[quicwg/base-drafts] d0d15f: Fix #3405: Specify that active_connection_id_limit...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/w_G23jbznEjPJ1slQq_roslwASs/
2834889
1878063
[quicwg/base-drafts] 3cc22a: Script updating gh-pages from 27db33c2. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 3cc22a: Script updating gh-pages from 27db33c2. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zK_z-EMjp5J2rUqIeYt4LEy-vLw/
2834887
1878062
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
ianswett
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-jHJsdMb6flNS7m5jeFxBrjPOh8/
2834883
1878061
[quicwg/base-drafts] 881369: Redefine recovery period[quicwg/base-drafts] 881369: Redefine recovery period
ianswett
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G3S18qjNS4ya3uj-XndWaZJx9vY/
2834882
1878060
[quicwg/base-drafts] 884a94: Script updating issues at 2020-02-11T23:42:52Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] 884a94: Script updating issues at 2020-02-11T23:42:52Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ORvz-H2Gvj3vArQ-BPoFlppHwRc/
2834881
1878059
[quicwg/base-drafts] 54b330: Script updating gh-pages from 99baf78d. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 54b330: Script updating gh-pages from 99baf78d. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OLmfLWqHWoU8VECzMoWZ5NfOH70/
2834878
1878058
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EHI4tgglVujVtY-lwfX685Z6RsA/
2834875
1878057
[quicwg/base-drafts] ce9a03: Extension dragons[quicwg/base-drafts] ce9a03: Extension dragons
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uYSEvIQLZa6YiHVWtHqnwY8ZvFk/
2834874
1878056
[quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)[quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mby0VkrnVXqVCjmSxE5fJ3wasp4/
2834867
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yHuTghIA2h0FKt1IdA5q4twk3aw/
2834959
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/47wlV-C86a-wBpGHFR3ETjyXuXU/
2834985
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FeEmJ-LUoPsF4ZMLsIHH6Ss7fig/
2834986
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Sp3SsRtHnoZCBLomZVA3ydYMzl0/
2834993
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jexozQNBCdEbfQ-PQW8bsgC41xY/
2834999
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aTW2iJ02QBKgSjsQYEm4caZ_Ruw/
2835008
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9T0lIQ7WazzmELr3xbK4FRfmH0s/
2835012
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yqIagh09VscEfyt2QKZEDONOBOM/
2835082
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Hu8gR2OWtgrqDZtZ86wamrku01k/
2835135
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
mirjak
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nmb1snY7YQrxTFZfvA0-vjxiyW4/
2835144
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hqoe7z_X9w2JGKQyavayn_VY-gg/
2835145
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/21yXX4N2Qvyrx7p42lj4NuRcJHk/
2835244
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pJS1fl2mWVEAfNB6UdJsUE7PpGE/
2835311
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JoTHtjSUI05DnXKZmgVDBsWUa3c/
2835349
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Igor Lubashev
2020-02-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/v0Ixg0MENGZMUOeMIfsDK61KwxA/
2836313
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
MikkelFJ
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/TsuXctB99gUHRayxdHK6-tgJ2J0/
2838439
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wLB8oBNW0LY4-uPk9ek4FNEfc0M/
2838464
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Igor Lubashev
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/emfQ0exsrTi4vZJ3FNU4lEvQtRo/
2838614
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-24
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0qJ7Y4h70LMptRn60ErQgRoVqQU/
2839251
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Igor Lubashev
2020-03-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FHH_spnqCj6KLuMptIaYDfotaWw/
2842885
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-03-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rrS27GeulYpqGKv2lPyLQyo0fvs/
2842905
1878053
41 Messages