Subject
From
Date
List
[quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)[quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
David Schinazi
2019-04-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jYWgBAjQbs9lzChGtLnYa6fVxRA/
2715112
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Lucas Pardue
2019-04-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/u0UqooNeKh4XW4KUReaJyKFg1DQ/
2715113
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
MikkelFJ
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zodwnkqOybzEerL15GNjeOUCfUE/
2715162
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Kazuho Oku
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ihHPFSV0ndMcPgpHmP-ytSdHjag/
2715165
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Kazuho Oku
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FmaKq0sjeRggwZpADt13c2lMXW4/
2715166
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Martin Thomson
2019-05-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/v-VfGT0TlLP8aRmo8wPKfaS68sM/
2731244
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
David Schinazi
2019-05-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SWnScQgZbu_lmlFVUJZLh-H8pU8/
2731599
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-05-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WlLKTXj6My0MUK5HJ3dv0hgtGeY/
2731634
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
ekr
2019-05-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_afSO1KpykrZa_mQ6uFnVZvOzUI/
2731749
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
David Schinazi
2019-05-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lKlNDDqDmj2xYsQK9mvBVAR5DnA/
2731792
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Jana Iyengar
2019-05-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IF74WAqTCwynI9Z4p_y1m7H32p0/
2731816
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
MikkelFJ
2019-05-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NG4-Z3iv2R3Io5hKjvrZLti0AkA/
2731920
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
David Schinazi
2019-05-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JpJ6PSOH4-2A9S3LO4gf98C5CRs/
2732668
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
ianswett
2019-05-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2lyEDnFhJvbW0_4IenOjQtBlqMk/
2732964
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
MikkelFJ
2019-05-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ez-8qo5l2y9lH3cUo-YNU0zpOlk/
2732973
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
David Schinazi
2019-05-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/B8yf9TOEuWNKpMCcaCmT0V9gCr8/
2732979
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
MikkelFJ
2019-05-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/N0EuCqP9nxApdbhJbrEkkJYpBeg/
2732984
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
ekr
2019-05-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5lrLRmnxQS64r4p0tF-1-Ni7Ies/
2732987
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
David Schinazi
2019-05-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/05-O8IxAeRUi4x0kUKAIR29JK98/
2735972
1835140
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Martin Thomson
2019-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7o3S5RpQ1ZoBL23Jw1fiksg7TXs/
2738434
1835140
[quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)[quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Igor Lubashev
2019-04-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/AL4uLNH7GE93_Q4R7mGNcgyzS8M/
2714878
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Lars Eggert
2019-04-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qJWjTUn_K3p1I-iCIT4r9UtnKb4/
2721189
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
ianswett
2019-04-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rzwJSGQsWt0DlmdkgM0FvdK3JpM/
2721320
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Jana Iyengar
2019-04-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EpxJpy5Fjoy6SkUIPAObjTHzhmY/
2721864
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
MikkelFJ
2019-04-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rNGAL10gWX4U0srPxnOI5BsZoOY/
2721885
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
erickinnear
2019-04-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lSMvGOpbwX0aVovdTc-HfXSCtbA/
2721924
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Lars Eggert
2019-04-18
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/D-cgUcusghOaaybAe6FhKgeMQgM/
2722059
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Igor Lubashev
2019-04-18
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9e9wCgKYxgwV9UEGbNU-7htkGt4/
2722066
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Lars Eggert
2019-04-23
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3jKhWvKaiN7DIbV512VC6apUSIs/
2723411
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Igor Lubashev
2019-05-22
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/M7AU2cRAlyLBigP703DTZbdqpm0/
2734313
1835063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Jana Iyengar
2019-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6abXGYeQ2kFNnZLxWGDtmB277jQ/
2738059
1835063
[quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)[quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
Igor Lubashev
2019-04-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/E67-BMyGlLX1ozjnjkrSkFEU1xo/
2714869
1835062
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IS9DFif-oOdCahGu9MyujyfdERw/
2715124
1835062
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
David Schinazi
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9hI075jsYZeOjRm1V1cjcyw7Jgw/
2715127
1835062
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
Igor Lubashev
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/x8Hmt978ovDUIU8e1JLshurz8UY/
2715129
1835062
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
erickinnear
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jCOFP2f9_SS0bdWNOUtgigiFOxE/
2715131
1835062
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
David Schinazi
2019-04-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Y5h9wA8z0TAc8h99G5Z9U8l-YlY/
2715136
1835062
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
Jana Iyengar
2019-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/QIq2h7NgmR9gOVc84QdQ76-hHyE/
2738056
1835062
[quicwg/base-drafts] 811f93: Script updating gh-pages from 3e970d06. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 811f93: Script updating gh-pages from 3e970d06. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2019-04-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uwoLB36HJqYyrcch-qNIuFW3WCQ/
2714818
1835051
[quicwg/base-drafts] No state transition if RESET_STREAM is suppressed (#2578)[quicwg/base-drafts] No state transition if RESET_STREAM is suppressed (#2578)
Martin Thomson
2019-04-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/n0KOHNchinRZnGz2y3ANDi9rPOI/
2714817
1835050