Subject
From
Date
List
[quicwg/base-drafts] make connection migration symmetric (#573)[quicwg/base-drafts] make connection migration symmetric (#573)
Marten Seemann
2017-06-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hmn7l31lP2pO0Thg87qiK4dJ2V4/
2400196
1707667
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] make connection migration symmetric (#573)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] make connection migration symmetric (#573)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9QOa_mevyhvPwUPYBeXwnIkL8Kw/
2400285
1707667
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration symmetry (#573)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration symmetry (#573)
ianswett
2018-03-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/u6ldhthuPSWs-uSd5L6WW6zxIWo/
2556069
1707667
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration symmetry (#573)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration symmetry (#573)
Mike Bishop
2018-03-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Koqm1HaYVBGKr_pz5tsB4lTmBG8/
2556088
1707667
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration symmetry (#573)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration symmetry (#573)
Mark Nottingham
2019-03-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7FucJzqgtrIKou86O7efqpjuiiI/
2701109
1707667
[quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA (#572)[quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA (#572)
Subodh Iyengar
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_4PMw-98yZ8bjbLsCKlkdmmhAEg/
2400006
1707593
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA (#572)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA (#572)
Subodh Iyengar
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Mv6GLGrlt-k7yGuY_0B-LJjudeo/
2400127
1707593
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)
Marten Seemann
2017-06-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IkL4kROut2kHRJ5xYAbVA1-SdlU/
2400197
1707593
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)
janaiyengar
2017-06-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7oBQK0NklZFN1I2o1hmLdfEYBNU/
2403800
1707593
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KfjusHTJS0FXVh5lXmPL-Efhn8g/
2403836
1707593
[quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)[quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)
Subodh Iyengar
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i8r6_WYIZl4EkQonp161IqsRB64/
2400004
1707592
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/W5ZmyqDvZp9pMNoIE0UrSTuuobM/
2400216
1707592
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)
janaiyengar
2017-06-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PowQ9GcchC_iWTHSxWmI0ePC9vk/
2403770
1707592
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)
MikkelFJ
2017-06-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/HCj6qv42gLNzWRGNt8KiKHcz8tU/
2403775
1707592
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transition to half closed local should probably happen on FIN ack (#571)
Martin Thomson
2018-03-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3zvoodK6UCCstLBuZ2MIbtNohns/
2556063
1707592
[quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)[quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wbuUSwvGrfuvoWFACiye19JzxiU/
2399984
1707577
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)
MikkelFJ
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VJcGxLiHm9PT2YpK0OxoKsAkeNo/
2400003
1707577
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)
Ryan Hamilton
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SOQ2lAE8GprpbGytDLaj4qS3u2A/
2400062
1707577
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)
MikkelFJ
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PBdhuAmZuzlcZGoU4uHh-_9n66o/
2400066
1707577
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit what Version Negotiation can be sent for (#570)
janaiyengar
2017-10-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7FbmY3-u1OjHplgyg9ueUOd2UUI/
2471262
1707577
[quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)[quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
Patrick McManus
2017-06-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VsK35JumwRQ8_8_mGgO-imJp9Ls/
2399878
1707532
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
mirjak
2017-06-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bLactCmR7Xl-wCp8sk6X7oJ0ers/
2399888
1707532
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PEMUa-CqFf1hgsQjGufVXe9fOCM/
2400214
1707532
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
ianswett
2018-02-23
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jqEqVBotwx21wdHaa_2OJxvU-R0/
2546505
1707532
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
Martin Thomson
2018-02-23
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tnRyz4vZNuYbD8keNHFNMDusCNg/
2546513
1707532
[quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)[quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)
Patrick McManus
2017-06-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EwYL7ZcKBHEX4Jqu9ZxI1XheZTs/
2399854
1707525
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Y2hnhFeAKnIe9bwTCGYVS5W3PaI/
2399983
1707525
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)
Patrick McManus
2017-06-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ggYB3ssOhYO9s5CD6hoNfpfH_cw/
2400058
1707525
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making cleartext integrity version independent (#568)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nyV5_1WlhyRhLm95sHyC1QvSxgE/
2400217
1707525
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Cleartext integrity as version independent (#568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Cleartext integrity as version independent (#568)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/HTQMsrH1plYZu3e2qmlUDlRCT0Y/
2529663
1707525
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Cleartext integrity as version independent (#568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Cleartext integrity as version independent (#568)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sKp-YhFC2fCy4gcHmmbAs7-qtuI/
2529664
1707525
[quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)[quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)
Patrick McManus
2017-06-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tmq2HksGtcSfitEmT8Ig7MmDz7o/
2399141
1707220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)
Mike Bishop
2017-07-24
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/C2zWdbGJmyl3y1jCgdNeGCoZAjg/
2425135
1707220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)
Mike Bishop
2017-07-24
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/TurfKoUert9NKKnFKcDVtFRGEJk/
2425142
1707220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] remove langauge that says how many bits of the packet number are used (#567)
Martin Thomson
2017-07-25
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/otv5SDbOA2Fk_1KSXQx7NZmPqns/
2425312
1707220
[quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)[quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)
Patrick McManus
2017-06-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Rbj2YUe41N8P7BKYBuvp1i2y4Ew/
2399140
1707219
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)
mirjak
2017-06-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/x8CROOog2qMc0BLc9BQQFcuGURw/
2399228
1707219
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kKGoCLTA5ptA56hmfPpVnfejFb4/
2399236
1707219
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)
Lars Eggert
2017-06-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/HcUVGBCfzsIYEmz_xJSH0Yxav14/
2399400
1707219
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] packet number text limitation on 32 bits of packet number (#566)
Lars Eggert
2017-06-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3Xha0UbfNXwWIcEAMVeVGRqFgCg/
2403875
1707219