Subject
From
Date
List
[quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)[quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Fh-sW2q9IF8St7x7l1P6nW6D4q4/
2832906
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Eric Kinnear
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1PUP7LNN6L8PKoKRchvm0mZj77c/
2832914
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
notonymous
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8784AbMalr_h3Tsiywu9u0mUaM0/
2833193
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qTgkpjZ0sk3THBNosI-3ZetPOKE/
2834053
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
notonymous
2020-02-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IOG6QUI8t_qAWSWtpOb3i33seS0/
2834078
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tuWftWGRvcoOtpxX0sxG6S055LI/
2835230
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
notonymous
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9AzXel9kDrieWLloxNrJ0Vy_jLs/
2835255
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Martin Thomson
2020-04-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/coGDCRNeqM6bgBGgT1EDkjYCsOk/
2872461
1877256
[quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)[quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ljqJMDH1Rv0BsHWe4gFPpf6J4Pc/
2832900
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lkIkxwkgLJa3pP1DT8TO5DJ60nk/
2832907
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OpYEUVnoRuQjG4awqkLe0Zn-ADM/
2832908
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/O0cGpDuhJcUac4SVQSRV0md3-8g/
2832911
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IEYj4PtEWgtMngl3cS_TXL9Ua9k/
2832931
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ekWpDxl85Pe2g3qdWIRAupUb_PM/
2832937
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cvxf_-KUhUO_L7oplypaX8yaot4/
2832948
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/owl-Rc7Slt-LwfzgncQMtoC25dM/
2838180
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Martin Thomson
2020-04-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZlkvGqMGnUSZXzXPJvaiZMtrhjU/
2866234
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Martin Thomson
2020-04-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hRTj_IPvFITLY7M7VhTeMeyrEqw/
2866235
1877255
[quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)[quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/liDAJtrQSer3-qzR1jyqMacyqvQ/
2832898
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KMDLvw-Cq_zkG3KvZ2IrI0ukJhI/
2832930
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
ekr
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/AFbcrHzcDkMTAGjJUg3z1fehAqY/
2832941
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5kVXHEvRDfcbhQp3hdtH4rfjKCo/
2832949
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
ekr
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8ZNMAsQ1gZhXoLjL7rWpaZ5TN8c/
2832954
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tFsIMuJxyasX5KUi_uJdI9tf0d8/
2833073
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/heYwt0Nenb5qKIc98ZiMXT85NpA/
2833119
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bEFVh6AurG0JkmLZXUZRm7tzdwA/
2838667
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Kazuho Oku
2020-03-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/q_cKqgzNaZuGpo1Wmv136T3WrsQ/
2844346
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Jana Iyengar
2020-03-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iHDbZbYSzgQPXK-qfIufOAR5zok/
2855306
1877254
[quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)[quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Gwuj3AINVmIvr_RU0vEUr1w9Tes/
2832894
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
ekr
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8_F0Uo3BvR8_H9phaUxpxddctN0/
2832939
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Nick Harper
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PW0odvnyo2XQXCjk5ruPR77lbgk/
2832988
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/o1a8VuCrhaXJ527QB7024xnWWKM/
2833009
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Nick Harper
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2nwpsXkELNjO1F5eey4frwiVVWw/
2833106
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xSpr44R1GwUVecNaGcC-AmIkdgM/
2833282
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-07
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Moq45QUuN-ayngobaVahh2YUPSs/
2833440
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-07
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/24BB7b-TaNcm_vYFaYXp3jN9iAM/
2833454
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
ianswett
2020-02-07
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9XGuqnAPt55BlKAtdHrouR8sSo4/
2833480
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/HukQOYSI6rixE-UIdvuLr_uZfGs/
2834058
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Lars Eggert
2020-02-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WPDfRH8uA07L24nbe5lv8N8lF94/
2837253
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/n_iSopfdQLGmRgqHJxGApal_aWk/
2838653
1877251
60633 Messages