Subject
From
Date
List
[quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)[quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)
Mike Bishop
2017-12-24
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_YMA3z_4p4pqlBP8etySo__ASHQ/
2524308
1762093
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)
Mike Bishop
2017-12-24
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bir5J38eakHiD8g_jAYsjkY9Zv4/
2524312
1762093
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)
janaiyengar
2017-12-25
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9z0lZBNfbO898V771JBcJgGlSRY/
2524337
1762093
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)
Mike Bishop
2017-12-26
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iB6SJI2ZnGdltCztz_Sfy2qrIGE/
2524393
1762093
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)
ianswett
2017-12-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/U7PxyWuXLaNsf_JU6zQ_Lk4z-6Q/
2524469
1762093
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make figures comply with 65-character limit (#1031)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qZXdMb7TcMA92YyGOeiUkMdyVAk/
2524907
1762093
[quicwg/base-drafts] 3aad6b: Make figures comply with 65-character limit[quicwg/base-drafts] 3aad6b: Make figures comply with 65-character limit
Mike Bishop
2017-12-24
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7n3lQsctt5onVYPR3cASAWLm_hQ/
2524307
1762092
[quicwg/base-drafts] 401123: Make lint faster[quicwg/base-drafts] 401123: Make lint faster
Mike Bishop
2017-12-23
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3IJRjPu20160bvUnT2932mM2ze4/
2524268
1762064
[quicwg/base-drafts] 3688ac: Minor touchups[quicwg/base-drafts] 3688ac: Minor touchups
Mike Bishop
2017-12-23
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ShJ5eH3C-BOTHa4oZmpDhBE1msA/
2524265
1762063
[quicwg/base-drafts] bf482f: Lucas's feedback[quicwg/base-drafts] bf482f: Lucas's feedback
Mike Bishop
2017-12-23
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Gv9qSI8X3YgjYvOm0lFEKOK4Yq4/
2524260
1762062
[quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)[quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2017-12-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dLGsDH3QRgTgRb9YvbMOLscxbQI/
2523610
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2017-12-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Z-VH3aij_51mXXtc8xr3V8Ytc78/
2523618
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/feBlkDSXjWyOBG8LPlFucjrFYuk/
2524899
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/t1jVQ1RsYQJd06DhJWbi5NOeAJ0/
2525741
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-9vn5BFnGxJyFscK6Mx65V7J_cM/
2525988
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cN-g-RXAgouFykAq8INhudiLGik/
2526012
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BbqbCaexYv_grphO53Sm6UbyVvg/
2526065
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Lr4LjeTGsqsg1e_vJ_b-X-cBtVg/
2526074
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rVYV-G4f01zK25gFAoBbk6e0TRU/
2526078
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YjB7qwo__xnn28WR1FOI7UikaZk/
2526113
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-cJxScuSfOpkr40pr4H57m9NBkg/
2527148
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NZcwanRVzIp5uDScsmsU4vCKCNQ/
2527152
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/P2y-rTZTBn1JZekotebnPafO61A/
2529016
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZkioQz3VMKzgjjpDvhaElAu9pZs/
2529017
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/V1h5N1nOPULScNyNI2FYPmX5x0I/
2529018
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/m27HLh06T07t4TrHsMgbKRHk9I4/
2529019
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Nick Banks
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YbC_yS9aySt4i4ev0va4I9B49kA/
2529020
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/RtxmQiz-e2u-nGqnq6mjmCUy6fc/
2529023
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
ianswett
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4H0dA0Wnw1GpYojYHakt07jFgHk/
2529026
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/krsdVwhshA-T-D1QeuYOugpSMLU/
2529078
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/s1_sJ3mPecKLetipJDQhCgdru1k/
2529082
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
ianswett
2018-03-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-OyMQHZSUHQvMhvA-l6E0BiFS6c/
2556748
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
ianswett
2018-03-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/LO5sSQ7Y1E1thH_2B6OfrUF83gU/
2556749
1761749
[quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)[quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
Nick Banks
2017-12-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/orI1LEWp51vjHqLVxIMMNP3LPvk/
2523353
1761640
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
martinduke
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/z8TkrfWkoDHlMu_eCllffunhk68/
2526618
1761640
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
Nick Banks
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2A2HNZ3c5IgF4BlPwukkZzVm3Ic/
2526771
1761640
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
ianswett
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sW_-IA1b7aA3xmlxBePAZs4SvNA/
2526807
1761640
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
Nick Banks
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ri9a7ET6v_DLCGD5baSyFWsXv4E/
2526832
1761640
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
ianswett
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Kok4SQ8Crh6afVYgXe8NI015_jk/
2526837
1761640
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cAAddb8cFmEdopZlOpFzLvbGvuw/
2527070
1761640