Subject
From
Date
List
[quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)[quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Marten Seemann
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/I9ZzN9Q8RJ_HdHIDkjny8RLguek/
2340643
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
ianswett
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/D61rEx89IG_bX-RKUDAIJjliDp8/
2340669
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mNovXi6GWgPToiCWolR67bdRur8/
2340687
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cDvu0JFnEi100n2hm_ZdNxbDnoA/
2340703
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Igor Lubashev
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8S-3yLFBxEpSBl9em5u9eJwUN3Q/
2340767
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Marten Seemann
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9gXvdchyPmQOuBWeIvU29KKyvFg/
2340897
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Aron-Schats
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EYKlzVIWevlTZeRrcfRHagiNZVk/
2341019
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
ianswett
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jeN2p1jnzzN8QV6C7hC5uMTxLh8/
2341033
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Aron-Schats
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hNN4nQXZbYRYufmAjujs6GIN_1A/
2341052
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
ianswett
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Al7McnXvjWAQq3pevGfzxpjC-nA/
2341108
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Aron-Schats
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1sCDYVsYy7uAAtMYwgrtr7fhVJ0/
2341336
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
janaiyengar
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uSVsoucxkWjoj3SHjzLkr9mLCjI/
2341387
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1lTZefHg1ii5iebQmC7TU7F-tMU/
2341902
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Igor Lubashev
2017-03-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qnFgzdiIwnzHU1p6XA2j2wgGSQY/
2341983
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
ianswett
2017-03-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eVKugbspCTydnKZthxMVUaPdeLk/
2342196
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Martin Thomson
2017-04-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eN8XLxY1Ip-n6uJSpo6sM6uW0Ug/
2381516
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Mark Nottingham
2017-06-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ATEeArDTeIkIXPS8L4fxjWH5tV4/
2400814
1690579
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/POYXCSFXfh5ftpUhWEHS28XPwWY/
2402479
1690579
[quicwg/base-drafts] b84dc8: The client Finished message can't be protected wit...[quicwg/base-drafts] b84dc8: The client Finished message can't be protected wit...
Mike Bishop
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/AqO-1AuJMvWDWJ6HVHXBuoVerfQ/
2340642
1690578
[quicwg/base-drafts] b84dc8: The client Finished message can't be protected wit...[quicwg/base-drafts] b84dc8: The client Finished message can't be protected wit...
Mike Bishop
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VN4GEcyYLr7cSUfseD0mpRT0xFA/
2340641
1690577
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK means all frames processed; closed means all frames ACK'd (#381)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK means all frames processed; closed means all frames ACK'd (#381)
Mike Bishop
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KLsYLq7MDBKxnT3xIb1NF5hy-6w/
2340640
1690576
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK means all frames processed; closed means all frames ACK'd (#381)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK means all frames processed; closed means all frames ACK'd (#381)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/RrCXhy2GHWu3SxojaJRRTJXsKPY/
2340697
1690576
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK means all frames processed; closed means all frames ACK'd (#381)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK means all frames processed; closed means all frames ACK'd (#381)
Mike Bishop
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xHVHDe059YDlq8Gmi7rtUeGFigo/
2340712
1690576
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rmdIFXKKFtqYFHffvKHwoagv1t4/
2340628
1690569
[quicwg/base-drafts] fb12f1: Remove tls doc from the ignore.[quicwg/base-drafts] fb12f1: Remove tls doc from the ignore.
Martin Thomson
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Jx3K5IH2E_p5VzQzJZ-0AqcpO7I/
2340626
1690568
[quicwg/base-drafts] 605264: Why didn't my local build catch that?[quicwg/base-drafts] 605264: Why didn't my local build catch that?
Mike Bishop
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0nha1nQ4uBO-iLMhE3BoCstyuvc/
2340618
1690562
[quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)[quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)
Mike Bishop
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/q8DI3Kb-p-cKi_C80X1leooOUPQ/
2340616
1690561
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)
Mike Bishop
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xOy-J8xC2OW5_uTKlodkK1tEImw/
2340617
1690561
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wj1ooPynZRnEgmcGDf5-BCfQXG8/
2340677
1690561
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)
Mike Bishop
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JA0EwjM68cQ7E8PK9536HuN4K5c/
2340787
1690561
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mostly-minor header touchups (#380)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DmV4-EDmeNLte0KRSIV0yi1h0Kc/
2340857
1690561
[quicwg/base-drafts] f99e4f: Some formatting and wording fixes to the new heade...[quicwg/base-drafts] f99e4f: Some formatting and wording fixes to the new heade...
Mike Bishop
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7XDkliORKn5DXJfBPLajENSKoZ4/
2340613
1690558
[quicwg/base-drafts] Don't ignore TLS draft...? (#379)[quicwg/base-drafts] Don't ignore TLS draft...? (#379)
Mike Bishop
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tRI7nTFYCh4qgfR9sEa47kSW4PA/
2340584
1690548
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't ignore TLS draft...? (#379)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't ignore TLS draft...? (#379)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Lz7Y-rr7GmqhsFFHsIHEbOM1brw/
2340627
1690548
[quicwg/base-drafts] 3b6cf4: Don't ignore TLS draft...?[quicwg/base-drafts] 3b6cf4: Don't ignore TLS draft...?
Mike Bishop
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aYubkBfmuQYXHGBFl1bh_H0cJTA/
2340582
1690547
[quicwg/base-drafts] 8e1011: Partial commit of new header format[quicwg/base-drafts] 8e1011: Partial commit of new header format
janaiyengar
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Vu6V47JnmaR_ICYbyeDbrliOlOg/
2340534
1690533
[quicwg/base-drafts] 8e1011: Partial commit of new header format[quicwg/base-drafts] 8e1011: Partial commit of new header format
Jana Iyengar
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eeu0lHjIbItYNAEjHJFBHSHrAic/
2340177
1690431
[quicwg/base-drafts] e105bb: addresses mikebishop's and mt's comments[quicwg/base-drafts] e105bb: addresses mikebishop's and mt's comments
Jana Iyengar
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JwpZqni79tBPUUiv1WGMepYy_pw/
2340165
1690429
[quicwg/base-drafts] Flow control accounting uses the maximum data offset on each stream (#378)[quicwg/base-drafts] Flow control accounting uses the maximum data offset on each stream (#378)
Martin Thomson
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sQeX9ws3JXamiL0WhqUaL_8ieug/
2340158
1690428
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Flow control accounting uses the maximum data offset on each stream (#378)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Flow control accounting uses the maximum data offset on each stream (#378)
Marten Seemann
2017-03-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SZYUTUZa4ltqzOOilqyiYpNmjIg/
2340170
1690428