Subject
From
Date
List
[quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)[quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
Mike Bishop
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/brsRuNR39C6HUsHNS_GBBsV41o8/
2639488
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
ianswett
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/U9WmZoHp5D6U0jwWYRP52cOwV1E/
2639523
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
MikkelFJ
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/H14hFpbBjbykYEAlJVPEltWM6BU/
2639576
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
ianswett
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VJtS7jRc7rie4wuoNJcqPMPjn6s/
2639664
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
MikkelFJ
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gTy5Y1o6daVWt6oK7l1DIldsY04/
2639670
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
Mike Bishop
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uZnqeWuYPdxFhTGH8SRhRVmrh1g/
2639825
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
janaiyengar
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/osuu4PTsFzxeT8670NpY1z76isI/
2639829
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
janaiyengar
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GzCZevYmIZvdfVwhlKyr4K3_PSs/
2639830
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
janaiyengar
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/F3n9bcd4V_uafIoy7KXaNbL0fVw/
2639836
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
ianswett
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tIhdwuMN_DgDOBPPgrh6G0t07IY/
2639837
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
Mike Bishop
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2CqaaeWTs-T2U3zaLpt7Glp4giQ/
2639867
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
Mike Bishop
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/obBZPV07LehAJ1vEDWyOAPlGQxo/
2639873
1807594
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sequence for Connection IDs, RETIRE (#1829)
janaiyengar
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BIh8zaQoKvkgZe4zuDJvYisSTfA/
2639881
1807594
[quicwg/base-drafts] f6382a: Connection ID changes[quicwg/base-drafts] f6382a: Connection ID changes
Mike Bishop
2018-10-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/t7SIMA7NQ2h3kF3ZXJ3QIdEZYAg/
2639460
1807576
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0037fd: transport: add missing 2 new TP on IANA table[quicwg/base-drafts] 0037fd: transport: add missing 2 new TP on IANA table
Alexis La Goutte
2018-10-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DImNSHuiFiy1BdsxoF9flW0y9hE/
2639452
1807573
[quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)[quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Kazuho Oku
2018-10-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CL7lKj6Q5b--ri82Of-CbGKdEzw/
2639450
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
ianswett
2018-10-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VRQlr2apmaZ6smE3nROe5Caleok/
2639469
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Lars Eggert
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2_K6R6uOjw-1Lenf-yctiS_5TxQ/
2639595
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YDTh_8pAUGXJ7zkf-TUH6oCODYs/
2639597
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Kazuho Oku
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gggOXU5nwWHIe1DTpm85Zh_QKOo/
2639608
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Kmej_maTWyse9JsP_aDISBP8D-o/
2639612
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Kazuho Oku
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kln9H6RjH5a2sKA6p8Zr9HH5vlY/
2639666
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IRHIfGknEqvGUKVrl5OPumVFp8U/
2639671
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/y985CQg-2ZL1cv1hd2mzdxl9A6Y/
2639676
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Kazuho Oku
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1i6t2xRfMSXmdfmTJFheaMmbswU/
2639679
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ
2018-10-03
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-41CouXOtwECJveTWO6vZ0lWkbY/
2639683
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Martin Thomson
2018-10-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/q3R1a-jArofLAEfjf3kYMqyVjG0/
2644890
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Brian Trammell
2018-11-07
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XekPoGpkiGm5-Ei6qXeAHTT31r0/
2657075
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Brian Trammell
2018-11-07
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dbzj2mrHkLkcx1vvf6Q7AggNN2E/
2657077
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Kazuho Oku
2018-11-07
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Mo77zFTumiEXkagu6_Ke80jhOgY/
2657161
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Martin Thomson
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wdyyirjmilIL1x2wxMOLDit79H8/
2657296
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
erickinnear
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7vbFQH23FNGJGhytc229JP2_FQw/
2657351
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
ianswett
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/voYib3bN5kF_79HWx9UH1yIa5Oo/
2657439
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Martin Thomson
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fqGWIRXetc8N44o7eIirKwOUHtc/
2657448
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/f6gCb3KwaRYWmixvoof0OVJR7bI/
2657685
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Brian Trammell
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wzVFA9cVv3KUKzQyKJBEW-Zqej0/
2657769
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
MikkelFJ
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hUd90lgXM-sgavUX8xvU4wMGt18/
2657792
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
erickinnear
2018-11-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wOEEQRWvuaM6G9TWBYTOk5Zzj1o/
2657869
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Brian Trammell
2018-11-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fQy4vdbvFz-ZzX93cei9eOqvIXw/
2659105
1807571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin bit should be applied per each 5-tuple rather than per connection (#1828)
Kazuho Oku
2018-11-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sNKI695ntAXVacmEeFYH8caocow/
2659137
1807571