Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2VWP5ET6sOU0hReJnsOYaHcmNXA/
2835163
1877719
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1iZ8wWYGOzOZqg_12NS9wLL0wDs/
2835162
1877719
[quicwg/base-drafts] d7fabb: Jana's suggestion[quicwg/base-drafts] d7fabb: Jana's suggestion
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kI6eIZCjul4-VC_-Kmk3rOfp30Q/
2835161
1878162
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hqoe7z_X9w2JGKQyavayn_VY-gg/
2835145
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
mirjak
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nmb1snY7YQrxTFZfvA0-vjxiyW4/
2835144
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Hu8gR2OWtgrqDZtZ86wamrku01k/
2835135
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on evictable entries. (#3131)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on evictable entries. (#3131)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uah-hJY4iUD1BZf4R8egp9bvoDM/
2835084
1862801
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yqIagh09VscEfyt2QKZEDONOBOM/
2835082
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9T0lIQ7WazzmELr3xbK4FRfmH0s/
2835012
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aTW2iJ02QBKgSjsQYEm4caZ_Ruw/
2835008
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jexozQNBCdEbfQ-PQW8bsgC41xY/
2834999
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Sp3SsRtHnoZCBLomZVA3ydYMzl0/
2834993
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FeEmJ-LUoPsF4ZMLsIHH6Ss7fig/
2834986
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/47wlV-C86a-wBpGHFR3ETjyXuXU/
2834985
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rewrite section on ack range limiting (#3315)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rewrite section on ack range limiting (#3315)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qTVJeeLcHecrQHjgSv6vU2nscuQ/
2834968
1872638
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PhZakG2ErPcF7DFM6nK52VY-vQk/
2834967
1873349
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yHuTghIA2h0FKt1IdA5q4twk3aw/
2834959
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xIWOtMwu4Vf5uqq2rCADDbgEouI/
2834958
1873349
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/RiNhnmGaJ4HfujYF3zKzeHCzAJY/
2834952
1873349
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Import most H2 references (#3407)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Import most H2 references (#3407)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wvjtPPuDozAzHI-53zC_W9DVs00/
2834944
1876830
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] #3348 Clarify that you can use any issued CID at any time, even during the handshake (#3438)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] #3348 Clarify that you can use any issued CID at any time, even during the handshake (#3438)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1MDLittITFMaIpdIWE8Dq_DoEV4/
2834943
1877285
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "External observers" is undefined (#3448)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "External observers" is undefined (#3448)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Gw3slHEBsoVMVPtBrZEhbrH557o/
2834942
1877877
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "External observers" is undefined (#3448)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "External observers" is undefined (#3448)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lVoyESGkgq8H-_VfMcZ8cSZynik/
2834941
1877877
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document what needs to be checked for address validation (#2125)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document what needs to be checked for address validation (#2125)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4V-Wt38B28N1E-yJ0pNx-U7Z5EE/
2834937
1819177
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VMCC8ivVhSJjRYnBgvZf_eqVupY/
2834935
1873349
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0adc58: Script updating gh-pages from 3fc2b782. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 0adc58: Script updating gh-pages from 3fc2b782. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YzL0BVTHrAcs5bN_8szFLqULwsk/
2834934
1878081
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sFMerWqMLOq7vPZcVQ3Q7M6U3PQ/
2834933
1873349
[quicwg/base-drafts] 4c848c: what needs to be checked for address validation[quicwg/base-drafts] 4c848c: what needs to be checked for address validation
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KT-1NxULr78sUUFl8f5FUv8_xLc/
2834932
1878080
[quicwg/base-drafts] e6722a: Script updating gh-pages from 42a4c290. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] e6722a: Script updating gh-pages from 42a4c290. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xJFI2rD6-IbYcC8z2zKrrpJHFmM/
2834929
1878078
[quicwg/base-drafts] ae4ea4: Script updating gh-pages from f45e58d6. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] ae4ea4: Script updating gh-pages from f45e58d6. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zDi-r3EGx4Dm9958rtS09_Tr1wo/
2834928
1878077
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow use of token after client address changes (#3307)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow use of token after client address changes (#3307)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gIpjOK6N919LUvS4Oia6qWPZJMs/
2834927
1871618
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow use of token after client address change (#3308)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow use of token after client address change (#3308)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EKxSWQp1YxAwQbN6f5Ayk-aix5Q/
2834926
1871620
[quicwg/base-drafts] 957a75: Allow use of token after client address change[quicwg/base-drafts] 957a75: Allow use of token after client address change
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/LrlzsoF63ysoI78rEleMOc5JD90/
2834925
1878076
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0YINGDEl6EmEiv6tA2Vzw1XIATk/
2834924
1878075
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define stateless CONNECTION_CLOSE (#3292)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define stateless CONNECTION_CLOSE (#3292)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/B9e1UfBIH0b_e6eoIxe739B_pzg/
2834922
1870365
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE for unpadded Initial (#3269)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE for unpadded Initial (#3269)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OFAOfxTPfjq2KHxG7JqVTyp7M6M/
2834921
1868058
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Immediate close without state (#3297)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Immediate close without state (#3297)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8_9EDfJ10FnILLoMfUFGnoh1qQE/
2834920
1870716
[quicwg/base-drafts] 6f9f8d: Curtail CONNECTION_CLOSE for small Initial[quicwg/base-drafts] 6f9f8d: Curtail CONNECTION_CLOSE for small Initial
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0HSpIH4uUMr2zkRNSVHPq-YNdw0/
2834919
1878074
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EHaTRUeMkiJ0ijOgfhlj0WTOmyk/
2834918
1878073
[quicwg/base-drafts] b3c9a8: Script updating gh-pages from 5020e34e. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] b3c9a8: Script updating gh-pages from 5020e34e. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ueZaKApKMgh2CLdv5i23Z9MZ9YI/
2834914
1878071
60633 Messages