Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do not use undefined term "successful processing" (#1589)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do not use undefined term "successful processing" (#1589)
afrind
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4DiV0uouodQoQWjHyu0vvJwiscw/
2617209
1797202
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)
afrind
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KeMn6DNrrDYgBnGZhjjWXtGPPjY/
2617206
1797929
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Christian Huitema
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G-pZDg2_wLxY0nxEWcCi5jRVtq0/
2617205
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3sUhlTSCJCjBNSHIB03ZXnFAFOc/
2617196
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nbaeYpBth_U2GMyYOkbPH5ozbK4/
2617182
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9BpF75h_qIXZ901j25suyTQ2IEI/
2617176
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jb-0RVtq0Y-1-6w5ZuNskt_Zc8U/
2617163
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss application-limited congestion control in Recovery (#1619)[quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss application-limited congestion control in Recovery (#1619)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bJnkb6MuJhwiSIqBeC6EvYbGNj0/
2617146
1798676
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9Gw-wY1AGCMoTPfShV_sZWAKQGk/
2617108
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
MikkelFJ
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1B7z_2vSnmfys3e-YSp2GCZx2W8/
2617098
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Kazuho Oku
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8y95-YEvRSmP-5_RogHvE4SBCpc/
2617091
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Kazuho Oku
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iO5w3cCsWdKOfBW_tPi3z8Eunqo/
2617089
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
MikkelFJ
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/J4T6I0-WvZJiz21Vm67mPTZGGWg/
2617076
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts] quic-transport: dangling reference to quic-recovery (#1618)[quicwg/base-drafts] quic-transport: dangling reference to quic-recovery (#1618)
Julian Reschke
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/RkB-NU4erCEZ4OFwKynveXi9BrM/
2617065
1798647
[quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls: dangling references to quic-transport (#1617)[quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls: dangling references to quic-transport (#1617)
Julian Reschke
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eVPMcPwLAcBcdtKQsiEG1GlMHH0/
2617064
1798646
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/36_tCFdU-jns9vAEGy2cNwf87IQ/
2617058
1798501
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/n81vuZLqovtqSJ965BFqVUa3Tao/
2617056
1797929
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ki8jBtBwf57RdV_1ySc68j_yNE8/
2617055
1798501
[quicwg/base-drafts] fb6207: acknowledged[quicwg/base-drafts] fb6207: acknowledged
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/erXHtMjtbJGsh_aCE7rwrq1EZro/
2617054
1798643
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial destination CID is unauthenticated (#1486)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial destination CID is unauthenticated (#1486)
MikkelFJ
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eXWRzlssHdintgB7gD2xmaNuUDw/
2617053
1792124
[quicwg/base-drafts] af69bf: Allow Retry in response to 0-RTT packets[quicwg/base-drafts] af69bf: Allow Retry in response to 0-RTT packets
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gqriKvdUwjAuCU15nQyyx3Pr-7w/
2617038
1798637
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4BXDhqpKiIj4wka08lkddWVL6Sc/
2617030
1798629
[quicwg/base-drafts] fe4886: Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN[quicwg/base-drafts] fe4886: Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XCSWfw6ck-k4ijGOL6KAdkbn62c/
2617029
1798628
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BDt61u6et0MQ8K99X5IHae3LG8U/
2617027
1798626
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow Retry in response to 0-RTT packets (#1552)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow Retry in response to 0-RTT packets (#1552)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6mxNAPIaTgkV3EqhJtI2-tejxYs/
2617026
1795414
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retry in response to 0-RTT (#1547)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retry in response to 0-RTT (#1547)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8Bpu7LCMy0tne21ND1R2fvkGiIs/
2617025
1795235
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is 0RTT allowed after HRR? (#1168)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is 0RTT allowed after HRR? (#1168)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_hyqY28HudVETWgFgMqs6ewrKIY/
2617023
1774030
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mNBdKYAjVkPCy9KWFTg7R1lK0vg/
2617024
1798625
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN (#1514)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN (#1514)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iOSu3vdgGgQeQjp78kLqcc5mOjg/
2617022
1793863
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a client send 0-RTT data when receiving Retry? (#1507)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a client send 0-RTT data when receiving Retry? (#1507)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NVZv5ZxoouZ7AlnUlh_bDf71i8o/
2617021
1792798
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long header + token and PNE (#1535)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long header + token and PNE (#1535)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zZQeRxaOueK1DHleIspg5ebQqNE/
2617020
1794787
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework Retry packet (#1498)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework Retry packet (#1498)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4bbz4RtK1M4SzcAgmn2-7r1foXo/
2617019
1792521
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Must Be Decrypted to Read Initial Token Field (#1492)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Must Be Decrypted to Read Initial Token Field (#1492)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2nd5koXzxFIJFUbwrayiobWHelg/
2617018
1792268
[quicwg/base-drafts] b37554: Rework Retry packet[quicwg/base-drafts] b37554: Rework Retry packet
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eyBCk35BCy-FcT6h8QrchDs5uro/
2617017
1798624
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fNp7w9LLG23XqrVD8R6C7iKEV2Y/
2617016
1798501
[quicwg/base-drafts] Don't amplify 0-RTT (#1616)[quicwg/base-drafts] Don't amplify 0-RTT (#1616)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/M9wBZanc149lUsMwk_pemUHItyQ/
2617015
1798623
[quicwg/base-drafts] 551d14: Don't amplify 0-RTT[quicwg/base-drafts] 551d14: Don't amplify 0-RTT
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ngv7Pe_Dxixf8YkUSSIAPEQbqTE/
2617014
1798622
[quicwg/base-drafts] Wonky definition of kInitialWindow (#1615)[quicwg/base-drafts] Wonky definition of kInitialWindow (#1615)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iuMaQJCo5g0HAq_8EjrAXr7agNY/
2617013
1798621
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gIyzPHTg7NX8UNWCPwaBFKxzcIY/
2617012
1781712
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5TFcrqRtTTWAbpn13bHuuYpyrHk/
2617011
1781712