Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ES_nJ0RMw_UHxFOguLgNowuCUQ8/
2526629
1708305
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9Xc98URiLUB9Ng3crEtNHmynMe4/
2526630
1708305
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send Version Negotiation (#1038)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send Version Negotiation (#1038)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FgcU7t0La3SkpW59sWo1Yx_i1GY/
2526628
1763211
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requirement of PMTU > 1280 (#1014)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requirement of PMTU > 1280 (#1014)
martinduke
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wXCrPXRsnXYfLYKNKcD0ofI6S3k/
2526627
1760397
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)
martinduke
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ECD8Q20VgIQscrEV_gHDF_S_qXA/
2526625
1761159
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connections SHOULD Respond to Connection Close Frames (#1029)
martinduke
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/z8TkrfWkoDHlMu_eCllffunhk68/
2526618
1761640
[quicwg/base-drafts] When to send Version Negotiation (#1038)[quicwg/base-drafts] When to send Version Negotiation (#1038)
martinduke
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/w44BCe7pptzG_XlDUwUJVyIcWPM/
2526617
1763211
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rmz2BOx-GH0orqtC-E5VPGpYNbY/
2526598
1763065
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/A05HxJjtYdQBlZfZ4IOK93R-ovk/
2526597
1763065
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YZ3_5KVJnPaZXiPC_FJmGHigIoI/
2526596
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i0ctH5EPArQk4Mb_OK48pdM_CWI/
2526595
1762850
[quicwg/base-drafts] 4ed1e9: Text proposal on user land warning about lower lay...[quicwg/base-drafts] 4ed1e9: Text proposal on user land warning about lower lay...
Martin Thomson
2018-01-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zDqhclNiKsLGlGxXF8aL91qU8Ow/
2526594
1763201
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)
martinduke
2018-01-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nDq_4eYlMvbwfkdfnX6m-SOH2zU/
2526463
1708305
[quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (#1037)[quicwg/base-drafts] Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (#1037)
martinduke
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/93a-uJ1GmOJUFd207HEAgpBZJbw/
2526328
1763065
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
martinduke
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Z9KaAlGdAl3M0asxvbX86BQoR68/
2526327
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Magnus Westerlund
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DiQdavNOmLcmrSvofwD8whibYSY/
2526117
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Magnus Westerlund
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MfwaHQ52QKODsIaLqjqay8L-zCs/
2526116
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Magnus Westerlund
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KQjVy6Gl4NkiSbeOBeUyvqjYfIE/
2526115
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YjB7qwo__xnn28WR1FOI7UikaZk/
2526113
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Merge CONNECTION_CLOSE and APPLICATION_CLOSE (#978)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Merge CONNECTION_CLOSE and APPLICATION_CLOSE (#978)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Kpr9ofAIFLwu_fiuY43jbmdQe4Q/
2526082
1758841
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rVYV-G4f01zK25gFAoBbk6e0TRU/
2526078
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Lr4LjeTGsqsg1e_vJ_b-X-cBtVg/
2526074
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BbqbCaexYv_grphO53Sm6UbyVvg/
2526065
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hK7rNAEJzBBAgBDl15j6o5kfbjw/
2526017
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
martinduke
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/W7hrMd8DG_p0Ksmcqhbce03wpvQ/
2526016
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cN-g-RXAgouFykAq8INhudiLGik/
2526012
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/UnP7rXxC5p6EQBGqxMX-D94WQs0/
2525989
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-9vn5BFnGxJyFscK6Mx65V7J_cM/
2525988
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Mike Bishop
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/adU1WGMPy5CF1lPLN8Z3Ql-AAjI/
2525967
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Coalescing in HTTP/QUIC (#940)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Coalescing in HTTP/QUIC (#940)
Mike Bishop
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lG79-38W-NjBz_BKEuoLRsfevw4/
2525874
1757000
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
MikeBishop
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8ieHInHr3BdmXyXK-oFRNkO5PI8/
2525873
1762905
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Expand connection management text (#1024)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Expand connection management text (#1024)
Mike Bishop
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yej4d8ETgSGZ1VQZ8BqJ7K0Yh_I/
2525872
1761278
[quicwg/base-drafts] d09bf5: Expand connection management text (#1024)[quicwg/base-drafts] d09bf5: Expand connection management text (#1024)
Mike Bishop
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1Ji6Xp2NO3R58DPvFxJHlDoQKC4/
2525871
1762904
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)
Magnus Westerlund
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/z7BbLfrMcIw3cFxfl7TYGtYhxwY/
2525758
1708305
[quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)[quicwg/base-drafts] Text proposal on user land warning about lower layer overhead to addr… (#1036)
Magnus Westerlund
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BV5peV3pC2fGjsuxMKlkZozwmmA/
2525746
1762850
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Marten Seemann
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/t1jVQ1RsYQJd06DhJWbi5NOeAJ0/
2525741
1761749
[quicwg/base-drafts] Remove the STK in the Spoofed ACK Attack (#1035)[quicwg/base-drafts] Remove the STK in the Spoofed ACK Attack (#1035)
aditya dogra
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_b_xrKRXVVaEw78duKlhog81ZlY/
2525738
1762849
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Martin's hated comma came back (e323a81)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Martin's hated comma came back (e323a81)
Mike Bishop
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_YY8YcmBqSd0r5Kx9Sj-et0RS-Y/
2525674
1762809
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Martin's hated comma came back (e323a81)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Martin's hated comma came back (e323a81)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dmySzJq3WkxpllmsOaT95wVnjig/
2525670
1762809
[quicwg/base-drafts] e323a8: Martin's hated comma came back[quicwg/base-drafts] e323a8: Martin's hated comma came back
Mike Bishop
2018-01-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5jGcQOIP4H7RT60RWXbJmQ_EAjU/
2525668
1762810
40 Messages