Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does that include retransmissions? (#4030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does that include retransmissions? (#4030)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BxsuB3z2I_iCaLsVJXb87V0NAzM/
2921822
1909939
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Fsc-5nmLHWcE3jo53B-X_l1ZsAs/
2921821
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Doesn’t say the default is in-order delivery (#4017)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Doesn’t say the default is in-order delivery (#4017)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/w3FtEDJ8I86rI2ZpUgDP-dVYSr4/
2921820
1909926
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/e_Ae9Da-Fz50bRbIwJq93dw2hMA/
2921810
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MMA8eVkOUm3Ng1k148eemVaffdU/
2921808
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BHiBXWGDZJteE7rqCU8Urwnq-PI/
2921806
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DlGQvf9XqEkAfsXZPDyV9vN3WAo/
2921805
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MorRP8Lz5I6UHX33ZIdbMIorASo/
2921804
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/usJJKucTp1BKqT3d3ZilGPOrRZk/
2921803
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/T0puIjtmjwDIPyFPkefjrweP5vw/
2921802
1907660
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FO8OhEjoNktQBcjMwQ7zLXHpZlQ/
2921800
1907660
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Revalidation for ECN (#4037)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Revalidation for ECN (#4037)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kxwz5JSOFJvySb51CjkO4dK_eKk/
2921799
1910024
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bXmzeBGWJ08sjzCeDbBx-8BkhtE/
2921784
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/quilRCzX5cv2Gml0qPpfKZkup68/
2921770
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (1) (#4038)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (1) (#4038)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IssB0P8m6l5AIibqFjt1FgXwFzI/
2921769
1910060
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-txZga-1W0XywrMDwv6Fr-ua7bA/
2921765
1909927
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/g1hMbtXawPq6_RUKxzd-d_i2-2I/
2921764
1909925
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BAZoRRRfuI2ON368ztDb7-1MiMo/
2921762
1909927
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xF2JebW0ARH3OmrtoQEl344nWto/
2921761
1909925
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2ovCHHwzvEJSSyMwjLeGrll-KhE/
2921760
1909925
[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (4) (#4041)[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (4) (#4041)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/LpgDJz9aP_9wTHLIOrPVE6m50_8/
2921759
1910063
[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (3) (#4040)[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (3) (#4040)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7LFMiEDrnYn5FTKloVZlqdLgGUY/
2921758
1910062
[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Db0_vUD8UIDtHOKFeiQ7NUithTI/
2921757
1910061
[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (1) (#4038)[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (1) (#4038)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hviGhpongrHDTb-0lVJrfDPCRss/
2921756
1910060
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (#4020)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (#4020)
Marten Seemann
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0Q37Tmz5K9BGrpxjQQ5DRF_t_Dk/
2921755
1909929
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vspGhFegkkRyoOiQrqcdmMYEFSg/
2921754
1909925
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "don't delay" for PATH_RESPONSE (#4036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "don't delay" for PATH_RESPONSE (#4036)
Marten Seemann
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i8BG1bVHmrvrPrdy7WrOFNmUZMg/
2921753
1910008
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suspect this needs to not delay? (#4025)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suspect this needs to not delay? (#4025)
Marten Seemann
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-XI-U60R2PDHzr6j3J-AEM1tGBE/
2921752
1909934
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This statement is dangerous (#4027)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This statement is dangerous (#4027)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3MMra5-yzIYdkplcZTPrO2mJzgc/
2921751
1909936
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/swqooMtSo8KQcuKwPQZO5vJn-jA/
2921750
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suspect this needs to not delay? (#4025)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suspect this needs to not delay? (#4025)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6oCNbJWi1oTzpzQ8es0vPwqxli0/
2921749
1909934
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "don't delay" for PATH_RESPONSE (#4036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "don't delay" for PATH_RESPONSE (#4036)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Vi1qizTKqpJJhQDYTz9Mr4qbibo/
2921748
1910008
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What if parameter definition requires that it is stored? (#4024)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What if parameter definition requires that it is stored? (#4024)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/m8OlfpmWd6VUg9LFHP_JoZa663A/
2921747
1909933
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What if parameter definition requires that it is stored? (#4024)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What if parameter definition requires that it is stored? (#4024)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wZQzkZJBrlMCMnlEvQ0UNUPU1p0/
2921746
1909933
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/f22cjq1oi3fRwqQ5r5ksNnZ1X_A/
2921745
1909927
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nqu_bxq3Iu_dRlNzjfJB-59LNDM/
2921744
1909927
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client that does not PAD does not negotiate? (#4021)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client that does not PAD does not negotiate? (#4021)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3Bk11ZXIUF1DO73RrWx0TL5NYqQ/
2921743
1909930
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JVOzcinYma_jsGpnUdParLkdSNU/
2921738
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework section on persistent congestion (#3961)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework section on persistent congestion (#3961)
Kazuho Oku
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/b6MlGdoLTS4bDbkB8OuBixhhue0/
2921736
1906615
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This statement is dangerous (#4027)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This statement is dangerous (#4027)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/I_Yopem_oktZ43SPX9N2VCeLImQ/
2921735
1909936
40 Messages