Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/HgrKnjlKJBTpDoPKTJ4czXCAsFI/
2835347
1877260
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FjI1WK_E01nEurF10lDPihcd_wY/
2835341
1878224
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)
martinduke
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pgYuDAwfj9LGBiJam8qDUj3ARhQ/
2835336
1874686
[quicwg/base-drafts] e22342: Script updating gh-pages from 40d902ea. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] e22342: Script updating gh-pages from 40d902ea. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/I00pDYIZJWfn9oQ4Xrp9_GlAJ_4/
2835332
1878232
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/62cceNQ7GAXBwpwuPPomEZoEU8E/
2835331
1874686
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mention Ack Delay exponent in recovery (#3355)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mention Ack Delay exponent in recovery (#3355)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qg3q9F2uJpcdJC2WXOV3T0ZztbQ/
2835330
1874653
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tRmKPVa7Ykw4efDAN6dH9vzCeBs/
2835329
1878231
[quicwg/base-drafts] 960c98: Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent[quicwg/base-drafts] 960c98: Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/elg4AfPFL1nuKSOlvKfreADvyJk/
2835328
1878230
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OVhAF0maZ2FtSUwR-hNj8K9Zgl0/
2835320
1878224
[quicwg/base-drafts] e2aa95: Script updating issues at 2020-02-13T00:18:06Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] e2aa95: Script updating issues at 2020-02-13T00:18:06Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kpCGGB8SNc57qMTf4VZ-VQ0vpFs/
2835318
1878225
[quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)[quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wqFxp2HHML-dZtlUrdRn5yIKl7k/
2835317
1878224
[quicwg/base-drafts] eee4cf: Script updating gh-pages from 731f802d. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] eee4cf: Script updating gh-pages from 731f802d. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2GK9kGc3L6awqPhNVAE-yttlrzo/
2835316
1878223
[quicwg/base-drafts] 731f80: ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled[quicwg/base-drafts] 731f80: ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GID61qDVAibLySbzcIEn15c0k-s/
2835315
1878222
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pJS1fl2mWVEAfNB6UdJsUE7PpGE/
2835311
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
notonymous
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9AzXel9kDrieWLloxNrJ0Vy_jLs/
2835255
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9PwO3394bngPz7vEIoGIZqhq-ak/
2835245
1870509
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/21yXX4N2Qvyrx7p42lj4NuRcJHk/
2835244
1878053
[quicwg/base-drafts] 725d3d: Script updating gh-pages from 7d8e0a25. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 725d3d: Script updating gh-pages from 7d8e0a25. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WiO1PDgHNRNPPAtdRxFy2Rak54E/
2835240
1878191
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G9W8CrlAcPrthbeRb2ImsI9X05s/
2835239
1874686
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/017JnUTzzgJnxV7SeCy7KkYYPIU/
2835237
1877067
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CP1bHqftneno5cSt-319O1BgvSg/
2835236
1878190
[quicwg/base-drafts] 93bb69: Point out that the payload size could decrease[quicwg/base-drafts] 93bb69: Point out that the payload size could decrease
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zYWWfXS1DFLaDkRc-WfU1ySEAW0/
2835235
1878189
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3440)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3440)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/btOu0rRBMMosuuvN9N1kEiVxjbE/
2835231
1877339
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tuWftWGRvcoOtpxX0sxG6S055LI/
2835230
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients can send GOAWAY too (#3129)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients can send GOAWAY too (#3129)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YSFTBqd5fmQAtjz5dfq12W8Y_7o/
2835229
1862720
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Idle timeout editorial fixes (#3444)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Idle timeout editorial fixes (#3444)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9JXsNAN9kR6TZwjduQSBhvhDW0Y/
2835228
1877735
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/t1bybhBSX7GDsMhxUxcmHLTIJzo/
2835216
1870509
[quicwg/base-drafts] Terminology changes from HTTP Core (#3452)[quicwg/base-drafts] Terminology changes from HTTP Core (#3452)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IyQiEPZipdwy4dsANIbR0iMmSR0/
2835171
1878167
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0213f1: Script updating issues at 2020-02-12T16:13:24Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] 0213f1: Script updating issues at 2020-02-12T16:13:24Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i7SLjkXSkuqyr-SSOg1AQzMrKNk/
2835167
1878164
[quicwg/base-drafts] 838866: Script updating gh-pages from d7fabb01. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 838866: Script updating gh-pages from d7fabb01. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DDxSZTrK7wpdMl0fURk4EdLCfFU/
2835166
1878163
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2VWP5ET6sOU0hReJnsOYaHcmNXA/
2835163
1877719
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1iZ8wWYGOzOZqg_12NS9wLL0wDs/
2835162
1877719
[quicwg/base-drafts] d7fabb: Jana's suggestion[quicwg/base-drafts] d7fabb: Jana's suggestion
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kI6eIZCjul4-VC_-Kmk3rOfp30Q/
2835161
1878162
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hqoe7z_X9w2JGKQyavayn_VY-gg/
2835145
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
mirjak
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nmb1snY7YQrxTFZfvA0-vjxiyW4/
2835144
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Hu8gR2OWtgrqDZtZ86wamrku01k/
2835135
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on evictable entries. (#3131)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on evictable entries. (#3131)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uah-hJY4iUD1BZf4R8egp9bvoDM/
2835084
1862801
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yqIagh09VscEfyt2QKZEDONOBOM/
2835082
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9T0lIQ7WazzmELr3xbK4FRfmH0s/
2835012
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aTW2iJ02QBKgSjsQYEm4caZ_Ruw/
2835008
1878053
60139 Messages