Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)
Nick Banks
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/R-offQP8Gk9-JSJA5Tkw_g5ga-k/
2714439
1834871
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)
ianswett
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NsKBnHFBHoUQW8IKSj-v7ySTa-o/
2714438
1834871
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] bytes_in_flight might be reduced twice for lost packets (#2571)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] bytes_in_flight might be reduced twice for lost packets (#2571)
ianswett
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Q_fg_Lg0vW5JJlNhOwpCTPvd3ws/
2714436
1834876
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)
Nick Banks
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ro7Tfnq4Ogl3_M44Puy5NJ8oimk/
2714427
1834871
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTT sample should be taken only once for each largest_acked (#2569)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTT sample should be taken only once for each largest_acked (#2569)
Nick Banks
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KU1PvjyjHbYK211OtcsZcVnpMp8/
2714426
1834874
[quicwg/base-drafts] bytes_in_flight might be reduced twice for lost packets (#2571)[quicwg/base-drafts] bytes_in_flight might be reduced twice for lost packets (#2571)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eNUdPxI0CP7D8hKSGr1y_N8bXtI/
2714409
1834876
[quicwg/base-drafts] RTT computation section needs to mention largest_acked (#2570)[quicwg/base-drafts] RTT computation section needs to mention largest_acked (#2570)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/c5GnJ4DHdcKDM95b6sgA0BNExXE/
2714407
1834875
[quicwg/base-drafts] RTT sample should be taken only once for each largest_acked (#2569)[quicwg/base-drafts] RTT sample should be taken only once for each largest_acked (#2569)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Bam-F4azbRY77pFDXU5FNuUNyR0/
2714406
1834874
[quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)[quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/l7LrV7rNwPp5dmMbFT82eNjAvZY/
2714393
1834871
[quicwg/base-drafts] Restructure RTT section (#2567)[quicwg/base-drafts] Restructure RTT section (#2567)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fK4qHcKPR6Yai5gTO9hSJb4zo5o/
2714383
1834865
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify RTT calculations in recovery (#2506)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify RTT calculations in recovery (#2506)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jNB-FDPtFJqwXnP4X_EOOQ1Ir5E/
2714381
1830768
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2548)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2548)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SWmMutxkOQ3oGlgg9lxcdOJxzsY/
2714360
1833380
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2548)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2548)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/QMLzouJPq4XwPgiPM3byaUVEkZo/
2714359
1833380
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2547)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2547)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ISSQJ_DQjOzf6IxpnvoStOMo7lc/
2714358
1833379
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2547)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify that stateless_reset_token is not mandatory (#2547)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GCax1jCgRDfv_zFyNxncc7hKTts/
2714357
1833379
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term in recovery draft (example code in appendixes) (#2566)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term in recovery draft (example code in appendixes) (#2566)
Kazuho Oku
2019-03-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9MfLZa-cXKNz8QEH6gVT5OdBAOA/
2714216
1834784
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term (#2566)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term (#2566)
Andy Grover
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-O9DIuSAc4rG0To_zEzF15QJBjU/
2714180
1834784
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term (#2566)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term (#2566)
Martin Thomson
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fuTlOj8J57HJAOYjE1SQ_K6HmMM/
2714134
1834784
[quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term (#2566)[quicwg/base-drafts] Usage of "epoch" term (#2566)
Andy Grover
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4f7W_BM9RPlsAmw_UK9kvofN0-Q/
2714108
1834784
[quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout should have higher priority than time based loss detection (#2565)[quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout should have higher priority than time based loss detection (#2565)
Yang Chi
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EBId4K0BtiJv9I7bMoIAhR4ILzQ/
2714077
1834778
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Lars Eggert
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0jk0yrKSM4sDynbR568YntdsFYU/
2713997
1834485
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/TfZOOZxGdc0bjzpIT7El8TDBE4Y/
2713917
1834485
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lcMJzNZ6DiudvaUtRDx2Xhs8XE4/
2713886
1834485
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Lars Eggert
2019-03-29
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DJ7y0djZKuprQXvMUM-qeimPUzE/
2713768
1834485
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 2 or 3? (#2556)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 2 or 3? (#2556)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/x9ZebjERn4w1Bh0XCQZTdlfEf9I/
2713554
1834013
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Martin Thomson
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lDQ9zTvNDC6wUNoKrjyEuvwfhrE/
2713539
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Martin Thomson
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fODmxMMGqM1hM3GFqS0psbXAV5k/
2713537
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 2 or 3? (#2556)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 2 or 3? (#2556)
ianswett
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VUuWfEnJgsVfrclkUgAp1LGpzu4/
2713370
1834013
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dj9-MWSiXxVX6G0fl348Tul4bF0/
2713353
1834485
[quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)[quicwg/base-drafts] Updated spinbit text (#2564)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Q1QmL9WSMGZVvRwqbo3FlfBfkuI/
2713240
1834485
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i0OPFLRz2idFZSt21vnE47iQTg4/
2713175
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Lars Eggert
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-TyyOQqrmPyn0cOUSfRKkwI0hAo/
2713172
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0qb5Yd1aOfqhUDBOj50gohcA6B4/
2713128
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gFFPYEIxbCcHLCdOcEfUPV9Zlt0/
2713127
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BfN6TorXHbSE7pw4P13_diFtw6A/
2713125
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Moving text on spinbit into transport (#2364)
Marcus Ihlar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5KloAKpkXXW_msht3rhpLSyXyuI/
2713124
1823975
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nBbU34VvBAmpxJ1VI1YoiO5kYMY/
2713100
1824851
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)
Martin Thomson
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SjFiLimdryVHnPj1DPTMQNJ956M/
2713093
1824851
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Unicode Character 'LEFT-TO-RIGHT OVERRIDE' (U+202D) (#2563)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Unicode Character 'LEFT-TO-RIGHT OVERRIDE' (U+202D) (#2563)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MWxwgI-CKX9B2Rb4mdZ7XiVKc2o/
2713086
1834399
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Unicode Character 'LEFT-TO-RIGHT OVERRIDE' (U+202D) (#2563)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Unicode Character 'LEFT-TO-RIGHT OVERRIDE' (U+202D) (#2563)
Jana Iyengar
2019-03-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sXA4VoWHl0bkuyMkDdIO2plnwoE/
2713084
1834399
40 Messages