Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants: Unclarity in short headers (#2335)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants: Unclarity in short headers (#2335)
Magnus Westerlund
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XLuwaOcbIxMTB6aNGsskeVNrzQE/
2682587
1822940
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
MikkelFJ
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fYa7LNzqSbVKmRh1wvrm0TTGHDI/
2682564
1821882
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add note about frequent RTT estimates (#2340)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add note about frequent RTT estimates (#2340)
erickinnear
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PHaz84i2TUJHB4lL2F2TKGvQgnY/
2682517
1823215
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add note about frequent RTT estimates (#2340)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add note about frequent RTT estimates (#2340)
erickinnear
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6ZRZSMn6X9jaidHv46AGZat4NnY/
2682516
1823215
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0IIHsbr8nSi46EJxcHa3Ry42CGU/
2682514
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/02M_ukuPYzf6VbopQ2ahH_27e5I/
2682513
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dm4VPVCZRj3ihS4hSg7BwktpTsA/
2682510
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jEoBAFHx6GddrSLYh286V3ISB8o/
2682509
1821170
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dOH9qWl-83n7m-UWLKWRN23EgkQ/
2682508
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)
Marten Seemann
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SXMMSD7cnhMArWwpm4eeC5Xetb8/
2682507
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a server before address validation (#2341)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/j6LEQYE-ZzIh-zDgF6--Bei3jpE/
2682505
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a client before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a client before address validation (#2341)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/QEnqCqwTZtt0f0TLmbWt2b_dvb8/
2682503
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a client before address validation (#2341)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a client before address validation (#2341)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ie_YR3p1osh35Vg9OiWSdwTW3ao/
2682499
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yLRodii3WNI555kn5232L4xK_qI/
2682496
1819264
[quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a client before address validation (#2341)[quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that INITCWND caps amount of data sent to a client before address validation (#2341)
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/H1g-7WkUy8wYQg8ZodiWGHSqNk4/
2682492
1823220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Samples for RTT estimation (#2067)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Samples for RTT estimation (#2067)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rDly2b8yh_qRUPBaYMuQMFElO2c/
2682480
1817343
[quicwg/base-drafts] Add note about frequent RTT estimates (#2340)[quicwg/base-drafts] Add note about frequent RTT estimates (#2340)
janaiyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ONQ1Ei_cayCPiW-eiah4afXc5EI/
2682478
1823215
[quicwg/base-drafts] 3c1388: Add note about frequent RTT estimates[quicwg/base-drafts] 3c1388: Add note about frequent RTT estimates
Jana Iyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-VTtfb-C52R1rQXoD9YLCHMcRDk/
2682477
1823214
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/u2sJ5z6C9QsWJS2VVh4IfFSBLzQ/
2682476
1821882
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
ianswett
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xd_LJcV9YkkJEFh1ogJhn7c-FUE/
2682472
1821882
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
Marten Seemann
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EafT84Dsc2G8fmf_zL-9-QTiol8/
2682471
1821882
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider dynamic hybrid between time-based and packet-based loss detection (#1986)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider dynamic hybrid between time-based and packet-based loss detection (#1986)
janaiyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gbd8po_q8F5yl-LK9eym7PVMzlM/
2682470
1815039
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)
janaiyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5vhlrgf_o1_dfEb8USM31X4B9xM/
2682469
1813996
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)
janaiyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/s6zxPjp3TDS14mGl5IA4tbbMwVA/
2682468
1813996
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jKqyDExQeZQEk1Zrgi-Pzr7pIkM/
2682394
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] b5386c: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] b5386c: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
Martin Thomson
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/x1PhFzgPUs31asxJgg2n8CYI5WE/
2682393
1823175
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FNE2D3faN6E-ptXRjb5A_TWIhrE/
2682389
1821798
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0myenKghmV8GTxsY8KjWqq77RDE/
2682386
1822391
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: Push stream description diagram is ambiguous (#2338)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: Push stream description diagram is ambiguous (#2338)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2U3LXYWGb9_QJyCsWcNs08uMioI/
2682347
1823144
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_Z8ZpKzjIqL_s2wMizfuACS_s8E/
2682346
1823122
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)
David Schinazi
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2svUf3Vgq_lvyRwmOPTqB6FMXSU/
2682325
1821798
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)
afrind
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dtD6_j6mCFd0LTsWUY7EoZ3vqsE/
2682308
1823145
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
Lars Eggert
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hVMihK2rXbCsUPZ8OJbDJY63fmg/
2682295
1821882
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
MikkelFJ
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bWPUY8-e5q2w85Y0tGC_u9ebPH4/
2682294
1819264
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_9vNAxRkgxVtLKd7ejeiI0TaRa8/
2682293
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0d231b: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] 0d231b: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aXCcGBnydyVGpUNr5lB4-iLHpmY/
2682292
1823154
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tURW_E8UiafzSJGVMU-0ESXmi1s/
2682290
1799675
[quicwg/base-drafts] 3fb5df: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] 3fb5df: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0IRIE1l93HXJNN8EuCA7ec_5hjc/
2682289
1823153
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZtbxoSVCLvnDdm8aWLFYmP6SrYE/
2682288
1799675
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Q8y9EA4Jb4qwRaqQJaTIvu-xBi8/
2682285
1822391
40 Messages