[quicwg/base-drafts] 60d233: Restore "Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets"[quicwg/base-drafts] 60d233: Restore "Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets"
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cAS8kNbIrzGIxpX8QDIYYYQFM_k/
2835678
1878356
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Revert "Remove "Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets"" (#3457)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Revert "Remove "Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets"" (#3457)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6KnOFoRaX2Mhnf3SkRS-NUICP98/
2835677
1878355
[quicwg/base-drafts] Revert "Remove "Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets"" (#3457)[quicwg/base-drafts] Revert "Remove "Ignoring Loss of Undecryptable Packets"" (#3457)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kfS0_ynutuAsmaO4dviUwepKALc/
2835676
1878355
[quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify when it is ok to ignore packet loss (#3456)[quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify when it is ok to ignore packet loss (#3456)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/452MBO2XMT1K7WVFngfcgk3Sjik/
2835675
1878354
[quicwg/base-drafts] Add handling of all packets marked as CE (#3455)[quicwg/base-drafts] Add handling of all packets marked as CE (#3455)
mirjak
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pvzGHdwmu3YfWYORTsrduZOuEe8/
2835484
1878305
[quicwg/base-drafts] In an unlikely event of emergency.... set ECN marks (#3454)[quicwg/base-drafts] In an unlikely event of emergency.... set ECN marks (#3454)
mirjak
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6L5mcTUfg3MCOGTdneoeOJ5XoUU/
2835478
1878301
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
Nick Banks
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/H8UUxYrHlEQXFERI_JVijJwipHk/
2835461
1878224
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow application CONNECTION_CLOSE everywhere (#3446)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow application CONNECTION_CLOSE everywhere (#3446)
Nick Banks
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xRdQili44wtFPWjn6aplpfw9nkc/
2835459
1877773
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JHtaSa15jwY8peJh5oTY6-OgRks/
2835435
1878224
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5yyoZYYyaCfza7zS8pifGsLdPIk/
2835361
1877260
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow application CONNECTION_CLOSE everywhere (#3446)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow application CONNECTION_CLOSE everywhere (#3446)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7JS2TfIlRZwuXbDSQd7VkWmGfOc/
2835360
1877773
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow application CONNECTION_CLOSE everywhere (#3446)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow application CONNECTION_CLOSE everywhere (#3446)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2o2FFRUQtujLnoH0nkn5WcSvJ9w/
2835354
1877773
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/AfMh0ppXosj4Tl9-Gr9m1SEYzkY/
2835351
1877260
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
martinduke
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1jBoVWz5M4tEH9BzkPxFLiFmV3o/
2835350
1878224
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JoTHtjSUI05DnXKZmgVDBsWUa3c/
2835349
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/asjkrsSzmCSzLXDHwJn4YBvHaME/
2835348
1878224
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/HgrKnjlKJBTpDoPKTJ4czXCAsFI/
2835347
1877260
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FjI1WK_E01nEurF10lDPihcd_wY/
2835341
1878224
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)
martinduke
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pgYuDAwfj9LGBiJam8qDUj3ARhQ/
2835336
1874686
[quicwg/base-drafts] e22342: Script updating gh-pages from 40d902ea. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] e22342: Script updating gh-pages from 40d902ea. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/I00pDYIZJWfn9oQ4Xrp9_GlAJ_4/
2835332
1878232
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mention Ack Delay exponent in recovery (#3355)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mention Ack Delay exponent in recovery (#3355)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qg3q9F2uJpcdJC2WXOV3T0ZztbQ/
2835330
1874653
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/62cceNQ7GAXBwpwuPPomEZoEU8E/
2835331
1874686
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tRmKPVa7Ykw4efDAN6dH9vzCeBs/
2835329
1878231
[quicwg/base-drafts] 960c98: Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent[quicwg/base-drafts] 960c98: Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/elg4AfPFL1nuKSOlvKfreADvyJk/
2835328
1878230
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OVhAF0maZ2FtSUwR-hNj8K9Zgl0/
2835320
1878224
[quicwg/base-drafts] e2aa95: Script updating issues at 2020-02-13T00:18:06Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] e2aa95: Script updating issues at 2020-02-13T00:18:06Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kpCGGB8SNc57qMTf4VZ-VQ0vpFs/
2835318
1878225
[quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)[quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wqFxp2HHML-dZtlUrdRn5yIKl7k/
2835317
1878224
[quicwg/base-drafts] eee4cf: Script updating gh-pages from 731f802d. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] eee4cf: Script updating gh-pages from 731f802d. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2GK9kGc3L6awqPhNVAE-yttlrzo/
2835316
1878223
[quicwg/base-drafts] 731f80: ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled[quicwg/base-drafts] 731f80: ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GID61qDVAibLySbzcIEn15c0k-s/
2835315
1878222
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pJS1fl2mWVEAfNB6UdJsUE7PpGE/
2835311
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
notonymous
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9AzXel9kDrieWLloxNrJ0Vy_jLs/
2835255
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9PwO3394bngPz7vEIoGIZqhq-ak/
2835245
1870509
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/21yXX4N2Qvyrx7p42lj4NuRcJHk/
2835244
1878053
[quicwg/base-drafts] 725d3d: Script updating gh-pages from 7d8e0a25. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 725d3d: Script updating gh-pages from 7d8e0a25. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WiO1PDgHNRNPPAtdRxFy2Rak54E/
2835240
1878191
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G9W8CrlAcPrthbeRb2ImsI9X05s/
2835239
1874686
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/017JnUTzzgJnxV7SeCy7KkYYPIU/
2835237
1877067
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CP1bHqftneno5cSt-319O1BgvSg/
2835236
1878190
[quicwg/base-drafts] 93bb69: Point out that the payload size could decrease[quicwg/base-drafts] 93bb69: Point out that the payload size could decrease
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zYWWfXS1DFLaDkRc-WfU1ySEAW0/
2835235
1878189
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3440)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3440)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/btOu0rRBMMosuuvN9N1kEiVxjbE/
2835231
1877339
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tuWftWGRvcoOtpxX0sxG6S055LI/
2835230
1877256
40 Messages