Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cvxf_-KUhUO_L7oplypaX8yaot4/
2832948
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
ekr
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/AFbcrHzcDkMTAGjJUg3z1fehAqY/
2832941
1877254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3lEjH9emhQq3pK-5LMhuk8HS024/
2832940
1877260
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
ekr
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8_F0Uo3BvR8_H9phaUxpxddctN0/
2832939
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YMhUs21nDEbo9ojPpdtyF73vg_4/
2832938
1877260
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ekWpDxl85Pe2g3qdWIRAupUb_PM/
2832937
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE should be allowed in 0-RTT (#3436)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE should be allowed in 0-RTT (#3436)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qO7PBn53bDz-JD3AVURnjLhRGtM/
2832936
1877262
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE should be allowed in 0-RTT (#3436)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE should be allowed in 0-RTT (#3436)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nQnCBDQltQG9-qdrvtijseILCgQ/
2832935
1877262
[quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE should be allowed in 0-RTT (#3436)[quicwg/base-drafts] CONNECTION_CLOSE should be allowed in 0-RTT (#3436)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7yHoxRouULIzswWP9oq-ZFskuX8/
2832934
1877262
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_limit is unknown for 0-RTT (#3423)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_limit is unknown for 0-RTT (#3423)
Lars Eggert
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/I7VIOvD4I7dy3QPOEFqEisn3p5o/
2832933
1877063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IEYj4PtEWgtMngl3cS_TXL9Ua9k/
2832931
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KMDLvw-Cq_zkG3KvZ2IrI0ukJhI/
2832930
1877254
[quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)[quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3435)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tiV_qZozOqMMMfQdGwx0IAiOP2c/
2832929
1877260
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify zero-length CIDs and active_connection_id_limit TP (#3426)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify zero-length CIDs and active_connection_id_limit TP (#3426)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KV8QLq3QM8LKUvb3hOGgahxUbVI/
2832920
1877106
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT status of new transport parameters (#3433)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT status of new transport parameters (#3433)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zkGmRfyrQkyH_29fTG2BR7sebIA/
2832917
1877257
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Eric Kinnear
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1PUP7LNN6L8PKoKRchvm0mZj77c/
2832914
1877256
[quicwg/base-drafts] Remembering transport parameters (#3434)[quicwg/base-drafts] Remembering transport parameters (#3434)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6T5O53XGZmrefHY_e1YL71TpxSw/
2832912
1877258
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/O0cGpDuhJcUac4SVQSRV0md3-8g/
2832911
1877255
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT status of new transport parameters (#3433)[quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT status of new transport parameters (#3433)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jz-QUOpgpdaBsHfbzMdEQrG8frk/
2832909
1877257
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OpYEUVnoRuQjG4awqkLe0Zn-ADM/
2832908
1877255
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lkIkxwkgLJa3pP1DT8TO5DJ60nk/
2832907
1877255
[quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)[quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Fh-sW2q9IF8St7x7l1P6nW6D4q4/
2832906
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WMYu-9FMBSLaltSnf2syzFiMwGk/
2832903
1874475
[quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)[quicwg/base-drafts] clarify that HANDSHAKE_DONE, NEW_TOKEN, PATH_RESPONSE, RCID frames MUST NOT appear in 0-RTT (#3431)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ljqJMDH1Rv0BsHWe4gFPpf6J4Pc/
2832900
1877255
[quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)[quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/liDAJtrQSer3-qzR1jyqMacyqvQ/
2832898
1877254
[quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)[quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Gwuj3AINVmIvr_RU0vEUr1w9Tes/
2832894
1877251
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/j64pGq-1gL1WajvuyQrSwTeGchY/
2832891
1874475
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)
Lars Eggert
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Qbfvm_CfTUXNql1Bla8gkLqoOMU/
2832890
1874475
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)
Christian Huitema
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MRzzgpNSGe7sILUz13ymLJ3VGeU/
2832887
1874475
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/slNUr_dqsuNZAsUL3qmROhyTXdk/
2832885
1874475
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify zero-length CIDs and active_connection_id_limit TP (#3426)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify zero-length CIDs and active_connection_id_limit TP (#3426)
Nick Harper
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/14AcZ-MAgEla6TOabdcMbs7AvGY/
2832883
1877106
[quicwg/wg-materials] e5fb24: Ack Frequency presentation[quicwg/wg-materials] e5fb24: Ack Frequency presentation
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-06
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PYcw1A0HxkDBNwnG2g8BhlVebwA/
2832882
1877249
[quicwg/base-drafts] H3 guidance on CONNECTION_CLOSE does make clear if the type is 0x1c or 0x1d (#3428)[quicwg/base-drafts] H3 guidance on CONNECTION_CLOSE does make clear if the type is 0x1c or 0x1d (#3428)
Lucas Pardue
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-Wp0nDwufegGBJQQhPdkAkuaR3I/
2832761
1877179
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Here be dragons (#3421)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Here be dragons (#3421)
Lucas Pardue
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2RO2lFYdv9pqHFQkz-OEE0bNxkc/
2832728
1877051
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_limit is unknown for 0-RTT (#3423)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_limit is unknown for 0-RTT (#3423)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7wWVxA5f--YfmX4WiMimbV_suKg/
2832668
1877063
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Here be dragons (#3421)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Here be dragons (#3421)
David Schinazi
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yC-j2oc-29NUS7BoVMHur1yBCZc/
2832666
1877051
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Here be dragons (#3421)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Here be dragons (#3421)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/O5Bqk_JQIhM_sk6g7yYyB01SM2w/
2832663
1877051
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Redefine recovery period (#3410)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Redefine recovery period (#3410)
ianswett
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dM3QvJ_w8OEF43ku1C2Ee_CUxzs/
2832624
1876854
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Redefine recovery period (#3410)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Redefine recovery period (#3410)
ianswett
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nZTqqkInMVpMXjoSL0QLmIX197g/
2832623
1876854
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Anti-amplification limits should count junk too (#3340)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Anti-amplification limits should count junk too (#3340)
ianswett
2020-02-05
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/v84nQwY85INQEzEnDcsEtWWJiaA/
2832622
1874064
60856 Messages