[quicwg/base-drafts] e2aa95: Script updating issues at 2020-02-13T00:18:06Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] e2aa95: Script updating issues at 2020-02-13T00:18:06Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kpCGGB8SNc57qMTf4VZ-VQ0vpFs/
2835318
1878225
[quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)[quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wqFxp2HHML-dZtlUrdRn5yIKl7k/
2835317
1878224
[quicwg/base-drafts] eee4cf: Script updating gh-pages from 731f802d. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] eee4cf: Script updating gh-pages from 731f802d. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2GK9kGc3L6awqPhNVAE-yttlrzo/
2835316
1878223
[quicwg/base-drafts] 731f80: ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled[quicwg/base-drafts] 731f80: ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled
ianswett
2020-02-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GID61qDVAibLySbzcIEn15c0k-s/
2835315
1878222
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Jana Iyengar
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pJS1fl2mWVEAfNB6UdJsUE7PpGE/
2835311
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
notonymous
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9AzXel9kDrieWLloxNrJ0Vy_jLs/
2835255
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9PwO3394bngPz7vEIoGIZqhq-ak/
2835245
1870509
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/21yXX4N2Qvyrx7p42lj4NuRcJHk/
2835244
1878053
[quicwg/base-drafts] 725d3d: Script updating gh-pages from 7d8e0a25. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 725d3d: Script updating gh-pages from 7d8e0a25. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WiO1PDgHNRNPPAtdRxFy2Rak54E/
2835240
1878191
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack delays are adjusted by ack_delay_exponent (#3362)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G9W8CrlAcPrthbeRb2ImsI9X05s/
2835239
1874686
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/017JnUTzzgJnxV7SeCy7KkYYPIU/
2835237
1877067
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CP1bHqftneno5cSt-319O1BgvSg/
2835236
1878190
[quicwg/base-drafts] 93bb69: Point out that the payload size could decrease[quicwg/base-drafts] 93bb69: Point out that the payload size could decrease
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zYWWfXS1DFLaDkRc-WfU1ySEAW0/
2835235
1878189
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3440)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow CONNECTION_CLOSE in 0-RTT (#3440)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/btOu0rRBMMosuuvN9N1kEiVxjbE/
2835231
1877339
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Preferred Address needs clarifications (#3432)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tuWftWGRvcoOtpxX0sxG6S055LI/
2835230
1877256
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients can send GOAWAY too (#3129)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients can send GOAWAY too (#3129)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YSFTBqd5fmQAtjz5dfq12W8Y_7o/
2835229
1862720
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Idle timeout editorial fixes (#3444)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Idle timeout editorial fixes (#3444)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9JXsNAN9kR6TZwjduQSBhvhDW0Y/
2835228
1877735
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/t1bybhBSX7GDsMhxUxcmHLTIJzo/
2835216
1870509
[quicwg/base-drafts] Terminology changes from HTTP Core (#3452)[quicwg/base-drafts] Terminology changes from HTTP Core (#3452)
Mike Bishop
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IyQiEPZipdwy4dsANIbR0iMmSR0/
2835171
1878167
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0213f1: Script updating issues at 2020-02-12T16:13:24Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] 0213f1: Script updating issues at 2020-02-12T16:13:24Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i7SLjkXSkuqyr-SSOg1AQzMrKNk/
2835167
1878164
[quicwg/base-drafts] 838866: Script updating gh-pages from d7fabb01. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 838866: Script updating gh-pages from d7fabb01. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DDxSZTrK7wpdMl0fURk4EdLCfFU/
2835166
1878163
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2VWP5ET6sOU0hReJnsOYaHcmNXA/
2835163
1877719
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAY send 1 packet entering recovery (#3443)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1iZ8wWYGOzOZqg_12NS9wLL0wDs/
2835162
1877719
[quicwg/base-drafts] d7fabb: Jana's suggestion[quicwg/base-drafts] d7fabb: Jana's suggestion
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kI6eIZCjul4-VC_-Kmk3rOfp30Q/
2835161
1878162
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hqoe7z_X9w2JGKQyavayn_VY-gg/
2835145
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
mirjak
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nmb1snY7YQrxTFZfvA0-vjxiyW4/
2835144
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
ianswett
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Hu8gR2OWtgrqDZtZ86wamrku01k/
2835135
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on evictable entries. (#3131)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve language on evictable entries. (#3131)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uah-hJY4iUD1BZf4R8egp9bvoDM/
2835084
1862801
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yqIagh09VscEfyt2QKZEDONOBOM/
2835082
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9T0lIQ7WazzmELr3xbK4FRfmH0s/
2835012
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Marten Seemann
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aTW2iJ02QBKgSjsQYEm4caZ_Ruw/
2835008
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jexozQNBCdEbfQ-PQW8bsgC41xY/
2834999
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Sp3SsRtHnoZCBLomZVA3ydYMzl0/
2834993
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FeEmJ-LUoPsF4ZMLsIHH6Ss7fig/
2834986
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/47wlV-C86a-wBpGHFR3ETjyXuXU/
2834985
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rewrite section on ack range limiting (#3315)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rewrite section on ack range limiting (#3315)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qTVJeeLcHecrQHjgSv6vU2nscuQ/
2834968
1872638
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PhZakG2ErPcF7DFM6nK52VY-vQk/
2834967
1873349
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we allow ACK-only packets to be declared lost? (#3451)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yHuTghIA2h0FKt1IdA5q4twk3aw/
2834959
1878053
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Martin Thomson
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xIWOtMwu4Vf5uqq2rCADDbgEouI/
2834958
1873349
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What needs to be checked for address validation (#3327)
Kazuho Oku
2020-02-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/RiNhnmGaJ4HfujYF3zKzeHCzAJY/
2834952
1873349